Supratachophobia
Well-Known Member
Details details. It's feature complete for Space-Karen. Onto the next shiny thing.Don't forget the tonneau blocks that physical view out the back of the truck.
Sponsored
Details details. It's feature complete for Space-Karen. Onto the next shiny thing.Don't forget the tonneau blocks that physical view out the back of the truck.
As someone who drove a service van without a back window for years the safety aspect of this is a little dubious. If you count semis most vehicles don't have a rear view and rely on side mirrors to operate. Sure its not as good as having the view but you can drive to overcome it.I can't imagine Tesla ignoring this one because it's a critical safety issue in the CT due to the fact that the tonneau completely covers the rear cabin window and 100% obscures the physical rear view mirror. Couple that with the huge blind spots the "sails" on the bed sides create and you have a really poor visibility situation for changing lanes,etc.. especially in dark, rainy conditions.
That's true, but people who drive semis have to get a special license to do so and Tesla also deliberately made the CT so the side mirrors could be removed based on personal preference.As someone who drove a service van without a back window for years the safety aspect of this is a little dubious. If you count semis most vehicles don't have a rear view and rely on side mirrors to operate. Sure its not as good as having the view but you can drive to overcome it.
Yep, that's me. I attribute a little lower efficiency due to a lower wheel offset. Tires track much wider than stock. Like I said, I don't think 2.01 miles/kwr is all that bad for the CT, compared to a smaller, narrower R1T.Saw this in the CT thread as well...
" I went from 2.05 miles/kwh to 1.72 changing from 21" road tires to 20" ATs on my R1T. "
Did you remember to unhook the 30' Airstream from behind your Rivian for the 20" tire range test?
![]()
For a full size truck it is pretty efficient, the Cd is way lower than the Lightning & way way less than the HummerIt's hilarious that Tesla can't get efficiency better than an R1T despite looking significantly uglier. I thought efficiency was a big part of the rationale for the whack job design.
Is that 1.9 mi/kwhr an average of road trips or just day to day driving? In cold weather, short trips will typically be less efficient because the battery and cabin heating are a more significant portion of the energy use. I also assume you aren't running in conserve mode around town?My R1T with AT tires has been averaging around 1.9 mi/WH at highway speed during winter ( 30-50 deg) here in Colorado. That translates to sub 250 miles( assuming 130 usable kWh pack).
Kyle got 2.1 with CT which is not bad. Rivian has a bigger battery pack while CT has a heat pump. My R1T got 1.6mi/wh driving up to MTN and back in cold weather ( 2-20 deg) It sat in a cold parking lot for 5 hrs. Love to see extreme cold weather range testing with CT. I usually take model X when I take a trip to Vail. Its efficiency only drops about 15 % in very cold weather. Tesla’s Supercharging network also gives me a peace of mind. Rumor has it that Rivian is working on its version of heat pump. A bigger batter pack with better thermal management should give Rivian range advantage over CT.
Interesting about the tires - I did some efficiency tests the day I swapped tires and came to the conclusion that the Pirelli's and the Nokian Hakka LT3 studded were the same (tested on same wheels). I'll eventually get a blog post with better deets together.Well then you can assume the same truck on 35" ATs would fair worse. FWIW I always averaged in the 1.8 range before the camper, more like 1.6 these days and even less with my Nokian winter tires.
Different wheels too in my case, also probably normal winter efficiency losses from running the heater.Interesting about the tires - I did some efficiency tests the day I swapped tires and came to the conclusion that the Pirelli's and the Nokian Hakka LT3 studded were the same (tested on same wheels). I'll eventually get a blog post with better deets together.
Nice, i'm at around 13500 miles with 2.32 mi/kwh with 21" as well and about 1500 miles in conserve mode2.46 mi/kWh over the 14k miles I’ve driven on 21s, mostly around town with several long (1000 mi) road trips in conserve. Mid-Atlantic. Just a datapoint.
edit: photographic evidence
![]()