Why didn't they make the max pack 800v? I'm not the super expert but it seems like it would cause problems to have 400v and 800v batteries on the same line - might as well wait. Hey, maybe we can get extra speculative and talk about whether they're also going to 48v to accompany this ECU and wiring re-design. But the cool thing is we'll know exactly what they're doing in just a few months. Enjoy your weed my man.Okay - so you're argument is it would be cheaper to produce an 800v arcitecture than a 400v, then why wouldn't they do that with the max pack and get them a bigger profit? That just doesn't make sense, the whole idea of manufacturing when you're reducing costs is to streamline it. Adding a whole new BOM, new parts, more things to service, just doesn't make sense.
It is a part refresh - they've already said that, they are refreshing the battery to minimize the ecu and wiring harness usage? I'm confused why you'd see it as anything else?
Rivian should be pushing hard on anything that will improve their profitability and competitive advantage. Ford is supposed to be revealing their refreshed lightning for late 2025 production at some point, and the rumour is it's also going to be an 800V platform. Rivian needs to at least beat their current main competitor to the punch. IMO the sooner the better as long as they have proven their product internally.That's just a refresh not the next generation R1.
I was told by an acquaintance who worked at rivian in a position with knowledge of forthcoming product that there would be a ‘better’ quad motor max pack coming….One of the key things that the battery drives is the motors. So, in order to go to 800V, they'd need different motors. So, best case scenario is they bring it in with the new quad motor system, but then they'd have two different batteries. That seems the opposite of cost cutting.
The shared architecture with R2 would be the network architecture, that likely runs on 12V. So, it'd be no change for the R2 HV battery at 800 or 400V. Also, the sensors used in the R2 are likely different. So, what they'd get for reuse is the zonal design.
I do expect that if they're changing the pack design, they will likely do what they can for heat management and any other bugs that have been regularly experienced. So, *maybe* it could result in slightly more consistent charging performance.
The ONLY thing Wall Street cares about right now is reaching profitability. The ONLY thing.My little bird told me 800v plus heat pump for better thermal management.
Maybe the better is the quad motor going to enduro with more power than the Bosch. It'd be interesting if they then allow max pack batteries with that motor setup. I've been trying to hypothesize why they only allowed the max pack with the DM. I thought maybe it was something different about the enduro units, but I haven't been able to think of any good reason for that.I was told by an acquaintance who worked at rivian in a position with knowledge of forthcoming product that there would be a ‘better’ quad motor max pack coming….
Is it the quad motor, max pack, or both that’s “better”? ?I was told by an acquaintance who worked at rivian in a position with knowledge of forthcoming product that there would be a ‘better’ quad motor max pack coming….
1) anyone’s guessIs it the quad motor, max pack, or both that’s “better”? ?
Also, any word on lockers?
I would expect any Enduro quad motor to be an entirely separate refresh, and NOT included in the Q2 shutdown.Maybe the better is the quad motor going to enduro with more power than the Bosch. It'd be interesting if they then allow max pack batteries with that motor setup. I've been trying to hypothesize why they only allowed the max pack with the DM. I thought maybe it was something different about the enduro units, but I haven't been able to think of any good reason for that.
Not really. The same concept of switching dual packs of batteries from parallel to series for 400V/800V charging can also be applied to driving 400V/800V motors as desired.One of the key things that the battery drives is the motors. So, in order to go to 800V, they'd need different motors...
Hmmm. Now that you mention it, is that what the Hummer does? 400V for the motors?Not really. The same concept of switching dual packs of batteries from parallel to series for 400V/800V charging can also be applied to driving 400V/800V motors as desired.
Payload. Max pack is slightly heavier. You could end up with a configuration that wouldn't allow a driver plus 10% tongue weight of a 11k trailer.but I haven't been able to think of any good reason for that.
Also, an 800v motor can literally run twice as fast as a 400v one, as high as 20,000 RPM (Formula One, here we come with our R1F1Hmmm. Now that you mention it, is that what the Hummer does? 400V for the motors?
That said, it seems seems like quite the advantage to run motors at higher voltage too for lower current (smaller cables, slightly more efficient) reasons.