Dark-Fx
Well-Known Member
Yeah but is your sofa vegan?I've owned my R1 less than a week and I'm already going around talking down to those around me that own ICE cars. My wife owns one. The sofa isn't that bad to sleep on.
Sponsored
Yeah but is your sofa vegan?I've owned my R1 less than a week and I'm already going around talking down to those around me that own ICE cars. My wife owns one. The sofa isn't that bad to sleep on.
Yes, AND it's made in the U S of A! I plan ahead mate.Yeah but is your sofa vegan?
I read this article a week or so ago. It's a philosophical and musing discussion. IMO no apology is needed because there was nothing personal about it, no one was attacked or ridiculed. You seem a bit overly sensitive.This is uncalled for and bad form for a CEO. Donāt get personal. Just focus on the ideas, principles and facts of the point you want to make. If you make the argument, the data will prove the point. Donāt attack people, demonstrate the superiority of your position. I think he should apologize.
The world in 2030 should hopefully be more EV accessibleWhile RJ is technically right, he is being a bit insensitive to the fact that EVs are simply not at the level of affordability of ICE vehicles and a large percentage of the population simply can't afford to purchase an EV, the necessary hardware to install to charge it, and are deeply skeptical (as they should be) of the charging infrastructure not named Tesla.
I actually disagree with RJ on one point. I think it is nonsensical to be purchasing a purely ICE vehicle especially when hybrid options are available and affordable relative to the high cost of an EV.
I think hybrids and PHEV vehicles are an excellent option to consider if you can't afford an EV or have concerns about range anxiety and infrastructure.
In my opinion, he did address the affordability of EVs in a quite sensitive manner and at length.While RJ is technically right, he is being a bit insensitive to the fact that EVs are simply not at the level of affordability of ICE vehicles and a large percentage of the population simply can't afford to purchase an EV, the necessary hardware to install to charge it, and are deeply skeptical (as they should be) of the charging infrastructure not named Tesla.
Itās possible I missed it, but I didnāt see where he said it was sensible to purchase a purely ICE vehicle. Did he?I actually disagree with RJ on one point. I think it is nonsensical to be purchasing a purely ICE vehicle
How dare he compare the infrastructure of the early 1900's and the inconvenience of owning a gas vehicle to today's EV infrastructure. "I'm building a barn, cause my horse can eat grass anywhere along the way, but where can you get gas for your gasoline vehicle, there aren't enough gas stations. Imma build a barn instead of a garage"This is uncalled for and bad form for a CEO. Donāt get personal. Just focus on the ideas, principles and facts of the point you want to make. If you make the argument, the data will prove the point. Donāt attack people, demonstrate the superiority of your position. I think he should apologize.
Not sure how he addressed the affordability of EVs. Provide a quote.In my opinion, he did address the affordability of EVs in a quite sensitive manner and at length.
EV charging infrastructure will get there especially with the federal $ being offered specifically for this. Additionally, most charging will be done at home; so the public EV charging infrastructure will not have to be as massive as that for fossil fuels.
Itās possible I missed it, but I didnāt see where he said it was sensible to purchase a purely ICE vehicle. Did he?