Crotchetyoldfart
Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I've read a lot of the forums speaking about the merits and value of the Large and Max battery packs. As a Tesla S owner, I just want to point out some facts that may have been overlooked in these discussions:
- It is advised that you not charge a battery more than 80% or run below 20%-30% to achieve the best battery life.
- Assuming this is a general practice, which it is for me, that means that using a 315 max range on the L pack, the 'normal' fully charged range is ~250 miles, and the 'normal' empty miles left in the tank would be ~75 (assuming 25% and all rounded numbers).
- So, this means that a normal 'tank' has about 175 miles.
- All of this assumes the best weather, best wheel/tire choice, road quality, traffic, driving style and minimal or no use of any accessories (A/C, heat, heated seats, power ports, sentry features, adjustable suspension), all of which drain the battery and are not included in range estimates.
- Also remember that the quoted range decreases with age (usage, charging cycles and charging behavior), so this 175 miles is an optimistic number.
- As far as charging on the road, let's consider how many chargers will be needed if it takes 45 minutes for a 75% fill. And my experience is that this rate depends on # of vehicles charging. Compare this to 5 minutes for an ICE. I assume that there will be 9x the number of chargers as there currently are pumps?
- Other's charging practices and experiences may differ, but all of this suggests that basing your decisions on 315 miles between charges may be optimistic.
To be clear, I really enjoy my EV, and am very much looking forward to eventually, getting a Rivian with a Max battery pack or another EV truck. However, I do recognize there are many limitations. Getting another 50 +/- miles or 30% for the Max battery was an easy decision and will give me a tremendous amount of peace of mind. YMMV.
Even though I have never expected reliable delivery windows from a company that misses almost every manufacturing forecast it has made, I am profoundly disappointed with Rivian's decision on how they are prioritizing manufacture, their overly Tesla-like lack of transparency and the half-truths ("we're doing it for the climate") when they do communicate.
- It is advised that you not charge a battery more than 80% or run below 20%-30% to achieve the best battery life.
- Assuming this is a general practice, which it is for me, that means that using a 315 max range on the L pack, the 'normal' fully charged range is ~250 miles, and the 'normal' empty miles left in the tank would be ~75 (assuming 25% and all rounded numbers).
- So, this means that a normal 'tank' has about 175 miles.
- All of this assumes the best weather, best wheel/tire choice, road quality, traffic, driving style and minimal or no use of any accessories (A/C, heat, heated seats, power ports, sentry features, adjustable suspension), all of which drain the battery and are not included in range estimates.
- Also remember that the quoted range decreases with age (usage, charging cycles and charging behavior), so this 175 miles is an optimistic number.
- As far as charging on the road, let's consider how many chargers will be needed if it takes 45 minutes for a 75% fill. And my experience is that this rate depends on # of vehicles charging. Compare this to 5 minutes for an ICE. I assume that there will be 9x the number of chargers as there currently are pumps?
- Other's charging practices and experiences may differ, but all of this suggests that basing your decisions on 315 miles between charges may be optimistic.
To be clear, I really enjoy my EV, and am very much looking forward to eventually, getting a Rivian with a Max battery pack or another EV truck. However, I do recognize there are many limitations. Getting another 50 +/- miles or 30% for the Max battery was an easy decision and will give me a tremendous amount of peace of mind. YMMV.
Even though I have never expected reliable delivery windows from a company that misses almost every manufacturing forecast it has made, I am profoundly disappointed with Rivian's decision on how they are prioritizing manufacture, their overly Tesla-like lack of transparency and the half-truths ("we're doing it for the climate") when they do communicate.
Sponsored