Sponsored

Pedestrian Warning IN DRIVE? Wait...what?

Max

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Threads
35
Messages
1,534
Reaction score
2,351
Location
Maryland
Vehicles
Nissan Truck
If R1 gear guard can see people and disable recording, it can enable noise in presence of people (or animals even though they are too smart to get hit at 18 mph).
Sponsored

 

SoCal Rob

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rob
Joined
Apr 19, 2021
Threads
39
Messages
2,808
Reaction score
5,963
Location
Laguna Niguel / Palm Springs / Pioneertown
Vehicles
2025 Rivian R1S & 2021 VW ID.4 (2023 R1S sold)
Occupation
Information Technology
Clubs
 
If R1 gear guard can see people and disable recording, it can enable noise in presence of people (or animals even though they are too smart to get hit at 18 mph).
From what I read in FMSS 141 there is no provision for exceptions based upon a system which detects the presence of people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max
OP
OP

Gsxr150

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2022
Threads
40
Messages
483
Reaction score
445
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
F
The forward noise is different tone than reverse, but should still be there and be just as loud. The forward noise sounds like gravelly/grinding gears.

OMG! OK, gonna have to try it tonight. That's crazy...my 3rd Tesla and I've never noticed the forward sound. For whatever reason, I've always liked the reverse sound...space ship-e. LOL
 

cheffie

Active Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
40
Reaction score
39
Location
Irvine, CA
Vehicles
MINI Cooper S Conv, VW GTI
Occupation
Chef
I live in SoCal - R1Ts are relatively common. I've heard the pedestrian warning noise a few times and it sounds like a really loud fan. Almost like a car when it's warming up? Or and ICE car sitting idle with the A/C blasting - that loud fan noise.

I guess that the idea is to make it like "white noise"? In any case, I can definitely see it being super annoying while in a parking lot...or slow off-roading.

I could swear all of the videos featuring the R1T off-roading mentioned how quiet it was though? Was it disabled back then?
 

gd_r1t

Well-Known Member
First Name
Greg
Joined
Mar 2, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
121
Reaction score
250
Location
Bend, Oregon
Vehicles
Rivian R1T
Occupation
Product manager
Most recent models of passenger ICE cars are quiet these days. Meanwhile, I always notice when a hybrid or BEV drives by, and it usually sounds quite loud. I wonder if the decibel regulation is super high, or if manufacturers are going above and beyond requirements.
 

Sponsored

OverZealous

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
592
Reaction score
1,477
Location
Louisville, Kentucky
Vehicles
2022 R1T LE, 2023 R1S Quad-Adventure
Occupation
Product Manager / Front-End Developer
Clubs
 
Most recent models of passenger ICE cars are quiet these days. Meanwhile, I always notice when a hybrid or BEV drives by, and it usually sounds quite loud. I wonder if the decibel regulation is super high, or if manufacturers are going above and beyond requirements.
I've always felt the law was written very poorly. I think the idea to provide protection for people who are visually impaired or mildly hard of hearing is a great idea. I've had many instances in my own neighborhood where it's clear the people did not hear me rolling up. But calling out specific types of vehicles is very obviously pressure from the oil industry. (As far as I know, this requirement is currently only for EVs & Hybrids. I could be wrong.)

The law should simply say, all vehicles (maybe over some weight—though there's an argument even golf carts should be included) must produce a sound of at least N decibels when traveling under 18 miles per hour, or something similar. This way, cars with auto-shut-off engines are required to have the same speaker setup, as would any future driving technologies that might be very quiet.

At the same time, I don't actually like the speaker sound, and I think it negates one of the best things about electrics, which is rolling to a stop with the windows down, and hearing absolutely nothing (except maybe some relatively quiet cooling fans due to possibly breaking a few laws on back country roads...). But I'm not smart enough to come up with a different solution that is also fool-proof enough and as effective.
 

LeoH

Well-Known Member
First Name
Leo
Joined
Jun 12, 2020
Threads
4
Messages
371
Reaction score
441
Location
Illinois
Vehicles
RIVIAN R1S, Tesla S, MAzda CX-30, Toyota Sienna
Occupation
Software Engineering Director
I've always felt the law was written very poorly. I think the idea to provide protection for people who are visually impaired or mildly hard of hearing is a great idea. I've had many instances in my own neighborhood where it's clear the people did not hear me rolling up. But calling out specific types of vehicles is very obviously pressure from the oil industry. (As far as I know, this requirement is currently only for EVs & Hybrids. I could be wrong.)

The law should simply say, all vehicles (maybe over some weight—though there's an argument even golf carts should be included) must produce a sound of at least N decibels when traveling under 18 miles per hour, or something similar. This way, cars with auto-shut-off engines are required to have the same speaker setup, as would any future driving technologies that might be very quiet.

At the same time, I don't actually like the speaker sound, and I think it negates one of the best things about electrics, which is rolling to a stop with the windows down, and hearing absolutely nothing (except maybe some relatively quiet cooling fans due to possibly breaking a few laws on back country roads...). But I'm not smart enough to come up with a different solution that is also fool-proof enough and as effective.
Your though is spot on. The noise is loud pitched to notify those with visual impairments that something large is moving. Other factors also come in, the noise has to also be audible when there are crowds of people, windy, or rainy, and consider cyclists. If I am not mistaken, the NHTSA provides the options for those sounds, the manufacturers get to pick rather than make their own.

The noise has to be added to forward motion under 18mph because stats showed that hybrids are more likely to be involved in pedestrian collision on turns and similar maneuvers, and that is when they are usually in EV mode.
 

Hemlock

Member
First Name
Jason
Joined
Oct 25, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
19
Reaction score
30
Location
Vancouver
Vehicles
2011 Dodge Durango Citadel, 2016 Honda Civic Touri
Occupation
Lodge host, volunteer firefighter
Good grief. Just blast them with the horn. ???:surprised:
It's what we do with the firetruck.
 

Ladiver

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Jan 23, 2021
Threads
52
Messages
969
Reaction score
1,824
Location
Ca
Vehicles
GMC 3500, Corvette Z06, Rivian R1T, Rivian R1S
Clubs
 
If red and blues don’t get their attention, then the air horn normally works. Unfortunately, many drivers panic and stop right where they are!
 

Firewired

Well-Known Member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Aug 6, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
108
Reaction score
131
Location
San Antonio
Vehicles
2022 El Cap Quad R1T, 2025 Storm Blue Tri R1T
If R1 gear guard can see people and disable recording, it can enable noise in presence of people (or animals even though they are too smart to get hit at 18 mph).
I commented to NHTSA when the rule was still taking feedback prior to implementation. I suggested that since many vehicles could recognize nearby pedestrians, why not have them only make noise when pedestrians were nearby so as to not cause further noise pollution? I actually got called by a NHTSA representative who said that they had considered that, but felt from their research that visually impaired pedestrians use vehicle noise to spacially locate where a road is located and so even if not in the direct vicinity of a vehicle, EVs making noise would further enhance safety for visually impaired people.
Sponsored

 
 








Top