timesinks
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I've gotten a few questions about our charging configuration, so figured I'd share a more detailed write up.
With the R1T, we now have two EVs. We had been driving a Volt for about 5 years and swapped it out for an ID.4 last summer. When we first moved into our house shortly after buying the Volt, we installed a Chargepoint Home 32A plug & cord on a 40A breaker to a garage receptacle. Considering the Volt's onboard charger was only 3kW, this was perfectly fine. But we also started to realize that our garage is just a little too small to store tools and bikes and still be able to comfortably roll vehicles in and out (typical Seattle even though it was new construction). So for years, we've been running the charge cord under the garage door at the expansion joint.
Late last year, with the Rivian coming s00n, the ID.4 also supporting 11.5kW charging, and the the EVSE tax credit scheduled to lapse, I decided it was a good time to get a pair of higher amperage chargers installed outside. I think the load calculations would have let me install two separate 48A chargers (we have a 400A service and they're fed from a 200A main panel), but 96A out of 160A continuous is a big chunk of the panel capacity (and the hot tub goes in later this month ?), so I opted for a load sharing configuration that tops out at 48A total. There aren't very many units on the market that support load sharing as of yet, and with the help of the Tom Moloughney reviews, I landed on the juiceboxes. They were also backordered everywhere, so as soon as I found some in stock in November, I pulled the trigger.
Edit to add: Load sharing means both EVSEs are on the same 60A circuit and share the same 48A cap. They actively communicate with each other. If both are being used, they'll either prioritize one vehicle or they'll split the 48A evenly. Once one vehicle is fully charged or unplugged, any capacity it was using can shift to the other. Basically it's magic.
It was a DIY install (it's all permitted, inspected, and above board). Since I wanted a charger for each side of the driveway and due to some other constraints from existing concrete, footers, etc., we bored under the 21' driveway to install the conduit. It was quite a big project but a lot of fun, so here's some pictures.
The Bullet Mole:
Conduit the whole way:
I was doing all this work, so I figured I'd add some outdoor 120V/20A receptacles while I was at it. Finished product with the holes filled in:
And of course, a shameless photo of our R1T delivery yesterday:
The Juiceboxes themselves have good hardware (though the charge cables are pretty bulky and inflexible -- Tom Moloughney rightly beat them up a little for it in his review) but the software has plenty of room for improvement.
I like that they are smart devices and that I can get the data out of them. I'm kind of a home automation nut, and they link seamlessly into my Home Assistant install (which subsequently stuffs all the data coming from them into InfluxDB & Grafana) -- and in case that meant nothing to you, I'm moving along now.
Things I don't like:
With the R1T, we now have two EVs. We had been driving a Volt for about 5 years and swapped it out for an ID.4 last summer. When we first moved into our house shortly after buying the Volt, we installed a Chargepoint Home 32A plug & cord on a 40A breaker to a garage receptacle. Considering the Volt's onboard charger was only 3kW, this was perfectly fine. But we also started to realize that our garage is just a little too small to store tools and bikes and still be able to comfortably roll vehicles in and out (typical Seattle even though it was new construction). So for years, we've been running the charge cord under the garage door at the expansion joint.
Late last year, with the Rivian coming s00n, the ID.4 also supporting 11.5kW charging, and the the EVSE tax credit scheduled to lapse, I decided it was a good time to get a pair of higher amperage chargers installed outside. I think the load calculations would have let me install two separate 48A chargers (we have a 400A service and they're fed from a 200A main panel), but 96A out of 160A continuous is a big chunk of the panel capacity (and the hot tub goes in later this month ?), so I opted for a load sharing configuration that tops out at 48A total. There aren't very many units on the market that support load sharing as of yet, and with the help of the Tom Moloughney reviews, I landed on the juiceboxes. They were also backordered everywhere, so as soon as I found some in stock in November, I pulled the trigger.
Edit to add: Load sharing means both EVSEs are on the same 60A circuit and share the same 48A cap. They actively communicate with each other. If both are being used, they'll either prioritize one vehicle or they'll split the 48A evenly. Once one vehicle is fully charged or unplugged, any capacity it was using can shift to the other. Basically it's magic.
It was a DIY install (it's all permitted, inspected, and above board). Since I wanted a charger for each side of the driveway and due to some other constraints from existing concrete, footers, etc., we bored under the 21' driveway to install the conduit. It was quite a big project but a lot of fun, so here's some pictures.
The Bullet Mole:
Conduit the whole way:
I was doing all this work, so I figured I'd add some outdoor 120V/20A receptacles while I was at it. Finished product with the holes filled in:
And of course, a shameless photo of our R1T delivery yesterday:
The Juiceboxes themselves have good hardware (though the charge cables are pretty bulky and inflexible -- Tom Moloughney rightly beat them up a little for it in his review) but the software has plenty of room for improvement.
I like that they are smart devices and that I can get the data out of them. I'm kind of a home automation nut, and they link seamlessly into my Home Assistant install (which subsequently stuffs all the data coming from them into InfluxDB & Grafana) -- and in case that meant nothing to you, I'm moving along now.
Things I don't like:
- Their web interface logs me out more aggressively than any of my banks (the mobile app does not)
- We don't have time-of-use rates with Seattle City Light, but the EVSE supports charging schedules. I personally think the vehicle is a more appropriate place for this to happen (and the ID.4 and R1T both have this capability) in large part because with Level 2, the EVSE can't know the vehicle's state of charge. But, the interaction between the EVSE and the vehicle both trying to be smart seems to sometimes land in a stalemate. I've turned the juicebox smart stuff as off as possible, and it hasn't been a big problem, but I do wish they'd clean up some of the logic on this.
- They don't hide the electrical configurations (including the load sharing group) behind any sort of installer access. It's just right there in my user account. This was nice as a DIY installer, but it makes me nervous that the units could accidentally be reconfigured to draw too much load for their shared circuit. I've given them this feedback -- support has generally been great, but they were very dismissive of my pointing out this particular thing is a code violation.
Sponsored
Last edited: