SeaGeo
Well-Known Member
Pretty lame since deliveries were supposed to start in September.
Seems like a delivery to me.
Sponsored
Pretty lame since deliveries were supposed to start in September.
Cheers to the head Cheerleading Coach @ Illinois State! ?
Seems like a delivery to me.
Clearly paid actors, doesn’t count ?
Seems like a delivery to me.
Her kids are cute enough you gotta wonder!Clearly paid actors, doesn’t count ?
/s
I see kids in a truck but I’m not on Insta. Details?
Seems like a delivery to me.
Sorry I'm not on Insty either- I can see her pics but no other details. For those of us who will continue to draw a distinction between a paid for but paid employee customer delivery and a paid for and unpaid reservation holder delivery ...do we have information that these people are the first kind or second?
Seems like a delivery to me.
Time for the RivianForum.com forensic analysts to break down everything about her account to determine how many levels of separation she has from Rivian and/or if she is a paid actor.
Seems like a delivery to me.
Let’s just hope the foreign agent isn’t too close to Putin and our online friend doesn’t end up with radiation poisoning.Time for the RivianForum.com forensic analysts to break down everything about her account to determine how many levels of separation she has from Rivian and/or if she is a paid actor.
I swear some of y'all are going to end up unmasking some foreign agent because they are in a picture with a Rivian.
I would expect nothing less from the crack analysis team on this forum.Time for the RivianForum.com forensic analysts to break down everything about her account to determine how many levels of separation she has from Rivian and/or if she is a paid actor.
I swear some of y'all are going to end up unmasking some foreign agent because they are in a picture with a Rivian.

That assumes randomness though, which isn’t a reasonable assumption at all.If this forum have 2500 members and there be 28000 reservations out there each of which turns into a truck then the probability that that truck be assigned to a member is 2500/28000. The probability that it be assigned to a non member would be 1 - 2500/28000 and the probablility that that the first 10 be assigned to a non member is (1 - 2500/28000)^10 and, therefor, the probability that at least one goes to a member is 1 - (1 - 2500/28000)^10 = 60.7%. By the time 50 trucks have been released the probability that at least one goes to one of us is 99%. Conclusion: either they haven't released many trucks or they are selectively releasing them to employees, investors,... This latter is just common sense, of course.
I don't want to put them on blast with their kids photos here, but her husband works for Rivian.Time for the RivianForum.com forensic analysts to break down everything about her account to determine how many levels of separation she has from Rivian and/or if she is a paid actor.
I swear some of y'all are going to end up unmasking some foreign agent because they are in a picture with a Rivian.
Well I hadn't actually thought of this in terms of a formal statistical test but indeed it could be looked at in that way. The null hypothesis could be stated as H0: "Rivian releases its trucks randomly to reservation holders and has released 50 of them." The alternative hypothesis H1:"Rivian has released fewer than 50 trucks or is not releasing them randomly to reservation holders". The observation is that not a single truck has gone to someone here. The probability of that happening under the null hypothesis is (1 - 2500/28000)^50 = 0.00931338. We therefore reject the null hypothesis with 99% confidence. Rivian is evidently not releasing cars to the reservation holders (or has released fewer; for 10 trucks released we can only reject the null hypothesis at the 61% confidence level which is shy of the usual 95%).That assumes randomness though, which isn’t a reasonable assumption at all.
QEDI don't want to put them on blast with their kids photos here, but her husband works for Rivian.