Sponsored

BrayBay

Well-Known Member
First Name
Paul
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
339
Reaction score
625
Location
Texas
Vehicles
Launch Edition R1S - Forest Green/Forest Edge
Clubs
 
Disappointing. While I've been a big fan of Rivian overall, it's little details like this lift point that drives me nuts. This is a company that tries to distinguish itself to be sustainable, focused on customer experiences, and seamlessly orchestrating "millions of decisions" for a single product.

This unusual lift point makes it feel like someone in the Rivian financial department snuck their way into product design to drive up service numbers. R2 customers probably might now need to go out of their way to a service center or risk damage to their vehicle because tire shops have to keep adapting.

Maybe someone can help educate me on vehicle engineering, but I feel like vehicle lifting (even heavy battery EVs) should have been a problem already solved by now that didn't need another unusual spin.

On the other hand, hopefully this means good business for @Mark_AZR1T to make more accessories that fills the missing gap Rivian overlooked. I have a set of 4 Jack Pucks myself!
 

Dave Cundiff

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Feb 28, 2024
Threads
4
Messages
1,170
Reaction score
1,583
Location
Pacific County, Washington
Vehicles
'23 R1S (DM,Max); '23 R1T (QM,Lg); '23 Chevy Bolt
I've learned to trust @Mark_AZR1T's engineering skills and common sense. If he's concerned, I'm concerned.

It has to be safe to lift the R2 in the field and at third-party shops -- not just at service centers. Rivian can't build enough service centers to do everything that every R2 owner will need.

I look forward to seeing how Rivian (and the Rivian community, if Rivian will let us) will assure safe lifting in all the places an R2 will need to be serviced.

Best to all!
 
Last edited:

DuoRivian

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
1,593
Reaction score
1,755
Location
California
Vehicles
Rivian R1T and an R1S
Occupation
IT
Clubs
 
Disappointing. While I've been a big fan of Rivian overall, it's little details like this lift point that drives me nuts. This is a company that tries to distinguish itself to be sustainable, focused on customer experiences, and seamlessly orchestrating "millions of decisions" for a single product.

This unusual lift point makes it feel like someone in the Rivian financial department snuck their way into product design to drive up service numbers. R2 customers probably might now need to go out of their way to a service center or risk damage to their vehicle because tire shops have to keep adapting.

Maybe someone can help educate me on vehicle engineering, but I feel like vehicle lifting (even heavy battery EVs) should have been a problem already solved by now that didn't need another unusual spin.

On the other hand, hopefully this means good business for @Mark_AZR1T to make more accessories that fills the missing gap Rivian overlooked. I have a set of 4 Jack Pucks myself!
I can see them wanting to maximize services like tire rotation, but since they do not fit new tires they know third party sites will be lifting these vehicles. They need to make things easier to be fully accepted into the mainstream and not have things like this (and 12V battery placement) being awkward and alienating the mainstream.

People get flat tires and call AAA and if things now made more difficult then word will spread and their reputation will suffer.
 
Last edited:

mkhuffman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Threads
14
Messages
2,833
Reaction score
3,193
Location
Virginia
Vehicles
2025 R1T Tri-Max, Jeep GC-L, VW Jetta
I get the idea, but the R2 jack point simply isn’t machined for positive engagement. There’s no defined locating feature, and the center cavity isn’t a keyed geometry (look at rounding of edges). Unlike the R1, a puck can’t lock in, everything depends on friction and precise placement.
I wonder if instead of "optimized for service center" they meant "optimized for manufacturing".

Maybe they just assumed what worked on the factory floor would work in a service center. That's not logical, but it sort of makes sense. The focus is manufacturability, not serviceability? 🤷‍♂️

Thanks for sharing this and it is very disappointing. I can see future stories of R2s falling off lifts and tire centers refusing to lift them.
 

Sponsored

savethemanual

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2024
Threads
15
Messages
886
Reaction score
1,536
Location
Earth
Vehicles
Future R2
Guess the crossbars aren't the only thing not compatible between the R1 and R2. Looks like were going to need jack pucks unique to this design. Strange choice.
Yes, but I bet they will stick with same jack points and crossbars for R3/X and any other additional models that stem from this platform so there will be some continuity.
 

Ramfamnh

Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Apr 19, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
7
Reaction score
11
Location
Durham NH
Vehicles
Rivian R1T
Occupation
Work
Probably very wishful thinking but by any chance is the polymer pad raised a bit and the surrounding recessed area is 5"x5" allowing for some shop two post lifts to fit in the cavity but only pressure lift on the 2"x4" pad?
 

DD4ST

Well-Known Member
First Name
Daniel
Joined
Jun 5, 2024
Threads
12
Messages
362
Reaction score
285
Location
Florida
Vehicles
2023 R1T
Occupation
Retired
Clubs
 
Probably very wishful thinking but by any chance is the polymer pad raised a bit and the surrounding recessed area is 5"x5" allowing for some shop two post lifts to fit in the cavity but only pressure lift on the 2"x4" pad?
Not clear in the picture but it appears that you could lift it with a standard floor jack without the use of pucks. The required use of pucks for R!’s is always a LIMFAC on who can service these, both in training and equipment.
 

R1Thor

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Aug 9, 2023
Threads
8
Messages
1,531
Reaction score
2,412
Location
Lancaster, PA
Vehicles
23QM R1T, Limestone + Ocean Coast, 21" & UBS
Occupation
Mechanical Engineering Lead
Clubs
 
This design seems VERY suboptimal for tire changes in any non-idealized environment.
IE: roadside tire changes, or even more concerning: off-road tire swaps. If there's no positive engagement, and you're on any kind of slope or loose terrain, the odds of something going sideways, LITERALLY, are greatly increased.

This...this seems bad.

Seems like another step away from "Right to Repair" in my opinion, as well. There is literally no good reason I can fathom wherein you need a custom or unique geometry as a lift point. None.
 

Sponsored

Nixapatfan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2024
Threads
7
Messages
589
Reaction score
1,212
Location
Massachusetts
Vehicles
R1T
Yet another reason why I won't be returning to Rivian once I'm done with the T, this company is just so hostile to 3rd party / DIY things. Just doesn't fit with how I do things, next thing you'll find is some crazy pentalobe screws everywhere.
 

mkennedy009

Well-Known Member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Mar 11, 2026
Threads
1
Messages
48
Reaction score
67
Location
Scappoose, OR
Vehicles
2012 Triumph Bonneville T100 110th Anniversary
Occupation
Database developer
I guess the $799 spare tire kit from the accessory store will have one puck or maybe a proprietary bottle jack with a special interface.
 

jeeden

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
Oct 27, 2020
Threads
57
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
1,632
Location
Northern VA
Vehicles
Rivian R1S, 2016 Ford Escape, 2015 Ford Mustang GT
Occupation
Project Manager
Clubs
 
With the exception of costco which uses pucks, so many of the third party shops around me use newer lifts and jack under the control arms now I don't know if I see this being an issue. I think the days of jack points are going away because there are so many designs for unique unibodies, EVs, etc.
Sponsored

 
 








Top