RoadRunner
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- A
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2022
- Threads
- 16
- Messages
- 232
- Reaction score
- 353
- Location
- New Mexico
- Vehicles
- R1S Dual Max AT
- Thread starter
- #1
I'm a preorder/voucher holder and have been waiting for the update to pull the trigger on a new 2025 R1S, Dual motor Large pack with AT upgrade.
I'm very happy with most of the updates and I'm pretty hesitant to buy the old version at this point. However, it seems the new Large pack has gotten smaller by about 20kwh resulting in a reported 27 miles less range on the AT wheels/tires than the 2024 version. I was hoping for slightly longer range with the update, not less. [EDIT: Oh well - I get why they'd do that, it makes sense from a business standpoint. So I'm not complaining, just trying to figure out whether the new smaller large pack would give us enough range.]
For our use case I think the AT upgrade is fairly important so we're not willing to give that up. No plans to tow and don't want to pay for Max pack if we can avoid it.
Am I overthinking this? Is losing 27 miles of range worth worrying about?
Is the range likely to improve with software etc?
I know there is some speculation that the new Large pack is actually a software locked Max pack - if that is true does that mean you can charge it to 100% more often with less degradation of the pack?
I live in Santa Fe NM, road trip destinations would be mainly hiking trips to Colorado/Arizona/Utah, an annual ski trip to utah, with perhaps an occasional national park trip to Wyoming/Montana or California. NM charging infrastructure isn't the best, but with a Tesla adapter maybe this is still plenty of range? I know we could also switch out the AT tires after purchase to get better range, but I really don't want to give up the RUS, spare tire, and compressor or go to 21"/22" wheels.
Not planning on hardcore off-road trails, but frequent dirt roads to trailheads, some of them fairly rough and remote, frequent snow use in winter for skiing, etc. Will charge in garage most of the time with power from solar panels. This will be our first EV. Thanks for any input.
I'm very happy with most of the updates and I'm pretty hesitant to buy the old version at this point. However, it seems the new Large pack has gotten smaller by about 20kwh resulting in a reported 27 miles less range on the AT wheels/tires than the 2024 version. I was hoping for slightly longer range with the update, not less. [EDIT: Oh well - I get why they'd do that, it makes sense from a business standpoint. So I'm not complaining, just trying to figure out whether the new smaller large pack would give us enough range.]
For our use case I think the AT upgrade is fairly important so we're not willing to give that up. No plans to tow and don't want to pay for Max pack if we can avoid it.
Am I overthinking this? Is losing 27 miles of range worth worrying about?
Is the range likely to improve with software etc?
I know there is some speculation that the new Large pack is actually a software locked Max pack - if that is true does that mean you can charge it to 100% more often with less degradation of the pack?
I live in Santa Fe NM, road trip destinations would be mainly hiking trips to Colorado/Arizona/Utah, an annual ski trip to utah, with perhaps an occasional national park trip to Wyoming/Montana or California. NM charging infrastructure isn't the best, but with a Tesla adapter maybe this is still plenty of range? I know we could also switch out the AT tires after purchase to get better range, but I really don't want to give up the RUS, spare tire, and compressor or go to 21"/22" wheels.
Not planning on hardcore off-road trails, but frequent dirt roads to trailheads, some of them fairly rough and remote, frequent snow use in winter for skiing, etc. Will charge in garage most of the time with power from solar panels. This will be our first EV. Thanks for any input.
Sponsored
Last edited: