That’s a big IF. Continuing that thought, IF the CT is supposed to be hitting the roads late this year, and IF the CT has 800-900v architecture, and next year and there is still not a single Tesla charger in the US capable of charging at that speed, there will be several unhappy CT buyers. So all or some of what he said is not true.
I don't think you understand what I mean by pumped and dumped. He specifically went online and used his massive following to drive up the price of a crypto that he himself was heavily invested in then sold after the price was high. The only other person to have done so was John McAfee and he wound up going to jail for it. If this behavior was with stocks instead of crypto it would have been textbook securities fraud and the SEC would have nailed his ass to a cross for it.
It's because he no moral or ethical backbone.
This entire discussion is because we went from what was known to what if?
Because it shows the sort of dirty and underhanded shit he is capable of doing. This billionaire pumped a crypto and left a bunch of regular Joe's holding a bag of shit while he cashed out. A "trust me bro" from someone like that isn't worth a whole lot.
seems like a stretch to me... besides if the CEO of Ford or even Rivian for that matter turns out to be a scumbag that doesnt make the product less quality IMO
No it doesn't make the product less quality, but it also means I don't want to trust the guy at his word or get into business with him.
Did he lie about something? What word did he say about the supercharger network? And wouldn't it even be better to use even temporarily than not at all? There's like 100 things wrong with that logic all because people seem to have a personal vendetta against Elon.. I think what Volkswagen did with dieselgate was like the worst thing ever but I'll use an EA charger all day if it's even 2 cents cheaper than a supercharger
We are not anti NACS people, we are anti monopolies. You are way behind my forum friend.
