Sponsored

stynes

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
419
Reaction score
773
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
2022 R1S LE
Clubs
 
I’ve been on a road trip through the NE for the last 10 days that put 2,800 miles on my R1S over 55 hours driving. Having spent time using Autopilot in my M3, I couldn’t help but compare Highway Assist (HA) and Autopilot (AP). I thought this comparison might me helpful to others and I’m curious if others’ experience with HA aligns with mine.

Let’s start by defining some terms. I don’t have full self driving (FSD) but use AP regularly. There are 2 modes. One click down is essentially adaptive cruise (AC) whereas 2 clicks adds lane centering. This aligns with Rivian’s functionality as well. One click down on the drive stalk for AC to enable what Rivian broadly calls Driver+. A 2nd click down will enable lane centering. I’m comparing Tesla’s 2 clicks (AP) to Rivian’s 2 clicks (HA).

Now that we’re aligned on terms and how to enable them, let’s compare the 2. The first thing to compare is availability and Tesla wins handily. AP works, in my experience, virtually everywhere whereas HA has worked on 98% of interstates and almost nowhere else. The 98% may sound like a lot but it’s misleading. HA starts and stops. A lot. It stops at most highway splits. It cut off multiple times telling me a tollbooth was ahead when it wasn’t. It cut off telling me the lanes weren’t marked, the road was narrowing, and the camera was blurred. Every time it cuts off, alerts you to take over you either have to click the drive stalk up turning off both HA and AC or wrest control away (more on this in a moment). Or in some cases, like when it determines that the camera is blurred, it just stops. With the cruise set at 77, by the time it cuts out, alerts you, and you look down, your speed has already dropped to 72 and you have to go back to the accelerator to regain speed. There’s no traditional cruise control, it’s AC only so when the camera decides it’s done, you’re completely without cruise control at all. And once it kicks off, it’s at least 30-60 seconds minimum before it’s available again. The availability and consistency of AP are big wins for Tesla over Rivian’s HA.

In order to initially engage AP/HA, you have to be centered in the lane. With AP, if you’re not EXACTLY centered in the lane, Tesla will sometimes pretty abruptly center you in the lane. It can be a little jarring. I found HA to have the initial jerk much less frequently. In fact, if Rivian doesn’t think you’re sufficiently centered in the lane, it just declines to engage HA. So generally, in my experience, HA was smoother after the initial engagement at taking over. A win for Rivian.

Taking control/disengaging works very similarly in both AP/HA. When, for example, HA tells you there’s a tollbooth ahead, it flashes a warning for you to take control. There’s an animation on the screen for you to click the drive stalk up. Doing so disables HA AND AC both. There’s no reasonable way to disable HA and leave AC working. Unfortunately, Tesla’s AP works similarly. It’s kind of an all-or-nothing proposition. I said no reasonable way because there is a way – you wrest the wheel away. There’s a fair bit of tension on the wheel so to take control and somehow stay the current course, to not change lanes or something, isn’t the easiest. It’s easier (and safer, imo) to do this in a Rivian than a Tesla but there should be an alternative. I think they should allow you to click down again to disable HA but leave AC working. A minor point here about audio cues as well. Rivian audibly notifies you of every on and off of HA. And Tesla does the same. Tesla has a setting to disable this but it doesn’t always silence the notification. It seems to be traffic dependent. If there’s no traffic there’s no notification but if traffic is present the audible notification happens regardless of the setting. Rivian has no such setting so you always get the audible notification. If I click down twice and I have a visual confirmation on the screen that HA is enabled, I don’t feel like I need the audible notification. I’d like to turn this off entirely on both but since they work roughly the same way, this is a push on the AP/HA debate. I just hate that changing lanes disables HA, quiets my music for a half second, produces an audible chime, then turns my music back up. It’s annoying. The only minor difference here, if you turn your signal on, Tesla automatically disables AP whereas Rivian doesn’t. I think it makes sense to disable HA here but it’s not a huge deal were it not for some of the other concerns I raised.

Now that AP/HA are engaged and you know how to disengage, we get to perhaps the most important thing is how do they perform. The win here is to Tesla again. Rivian’s HA is ok on straight aways. I would occasionally get a little of the ping pong effect but not often. I did experience a pretty dramatic ping pong a couple of times when there were onramps onto the highway. It’s like HA would pick up the wide line, start steering to the right, then see the left line and jerk you back. It didn’t happen a lot but definitely a handful of times on our trips that passengers looked up to see what was going on. Additionally, going through turns, HA seems to want to over steer and then center to let the road catch up. AP is MUCH smoother and seemingly more like a human driver would be. Tesla wins this category handily as well.

Another important factor with AP/HA is keeping it engaged. With Tesla, at least with my M3LR, you have to tug gently on the wheel every 20-30 seconds or so. I also learned that thumbing the dials on the wheel will remind Tesla that you’re there and engaged. Rivian has a touch sensitive wheel that Tesla doesn’t and this was SUPER nice. I typically kind of have my right wrist resting on my leg with my hand loosely on the wheel and it just worked. This is a big win for Rivian.

Rivian also places fewer limitations on HA vs. Tesla with AP. While AP works almost everywhere, you’re typically limited to 5-10 miles over the speed limit. While that’s not generally a problem for me, it was nice that when Rivian didn’t always know or sometimes didn’t pick up the speed limit change, I wasn’t restricted by HA. I also like Rivian’s blind spot notifications. Tesla has them just on the screen whereas Rivian has them on the screen and on the mirrors which is much more natural to me. Both are minor things, but nice.

In summary, big wins for Tesla in the availability and performance of AP. A big win for Rivian in the continuance of HA with the touch-sensitive wheel and a few other minor niceties as well. How has your driving with the two been? Which of these points do you agree or disagree with?
Sponsored

 

Florida Boy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Feb 22, 2019
Threads
0
Messages
51
Reaction score
63
Location
San Jose, California
Vehicles
Lexus RX300h, Toyota Tacoma
I also have both vehicles and I agree on almost all of those points. I haven't experienced the toll booth problem (though I've only driven a few hundred miles with Driver+). When driving both vehicles over the holidays, both had a phantom braking, which is always a bit scary. Tesla is definitely ahead, but they invested massively in their FSD stack. And in the end, the Rivian was acceptable on longer highway trips.
 
OP
OP
stynes

stynes

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
419
Reaction score
773
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
2022 R1S LE
Clubs
 
I also have both vehicles and I agree on almost all of those points. I haven't experienced the toll booth problem (though I've only driven a few hundred miles with Driver+). When driving both vehicles over the holidays, both had a phantom braking, which is always a bit scary. Tesla is definitely ahead, but they invested massively in their FSD stack. And in the end, the Rivian was acceptable on longer highway trips.
I had a couple of instances of phantom slowing in the Rivian. It eased up on the accelerator, dropped a few mph, and then re-engaged. All of the Tesla phantom braking I've experienced has been on city streets, not highways. YMMV, obviously.
 

Marchin_MTB

Well-Known Member
First Name
Marcin
Joined
Jun 25, 2022
Threads
14
Messages
1,505
Reaction score
1,971
Location
Colorado
Vehicles
2015 i3, 2011 Honda CRV.
Occupation
Aerospace Engineer turned Space Physicist
Clubs
 
Thanks for the review. Driver plus (HA) does not show as available on any of our major freeways (Denver area). I’ve checked and this seems to be an issue with my truck as others have used it here. Strangely, it became available on a short stretch of I70 in Utah which is the only time I’ve ever used it. Not sure if I should put in a ticket or just live without it.
 
OP
OP
stynes

stynes

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
419
Reaction score
773
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
2022 R1S LE
Clubs
 
Thanks for the review. Driver plus (HA) does not show as available on any of our major freeways (Denver area). I’ve checked and this seems to be an issue with my truck as others have used it here. Strangely, it became available on a short stretch of I70 in Utah which is the only time I’ve ever used it. Not sure if I should put in a ticket or just live without it.
I'd open a ticket. There's definitely something in the vehicle that... senses? it's ability to turn on. That's why when it cuts off, it's 30-60 seconds before it's available again. It's like it has to make sure it's safe enough to re-enable.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
stynes

stynes

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
419
Reaction score
773
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
2022 R1S LE
Clubs
 

johnking

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Dec 23, 2019
Threads
3
Messages
131
Reaction score
253
Location
North Bend, WA
Vehicles
BMW X3, R1S
As a user of the Model X and the R1S, I agree wit the write-up that Tesla's AP wins hands-down in functionality but Rivian is not far behind in its performance. The engagement of HA only when you are centered on the lane is something to get used to compared to Tesla AP. I have had quite a few free-way drives and during the day, I would say that there isn't much difference between the two.

When it rains, HA gives up easily and asks me to take control. Under similar rainy conditions, the Tesla AP performs well and only when there is bad visibility, it will ask me to take over. Similarly, during the nights, Tesla performs better and Rivian does better than rainy conditions. I had an interesting observation yesterday. There was a car ahead of me but Rivian was recognizing it as a motorcyle. This was in the evening. So, the patter recogition, identification implementations need improvement.

I have the Toll booth issue on I-405 in the Seattle area. I talked to customer service the other day and they said this has been reported by a few more people and they will issue a software update for this. Per the CS rep, there is no ETA for this but the team is aware of this issue.

I wish driver assist+ was available in all roads rather than just free-ways.
I wish there was a way for me to send a destination from my phone to the navigation app in the R1S. It might be existing and I am overlooking it.
In many places, I am observing that driver+ gives up stating 'Road Information unavailable'. Not sure if this is a data issue or due to the construction projects on the road.

Recently, Tesla switched completely to Tesla vision and they are not using the radar. I personally prefer the radar based implementation for forward obstacle detection. Over the last couple months, coinciding with the switch-over to 'Tesla vision', my MX is not as smooth as it was before while AP is engaged. It also brakes very late after the switchover. My R1S on the other hand, has a much smoother finesse for braking. It is smooth and there are no sudden breaks.

Top of my mind comments.
 

brancky3

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brandon
Joined
Feb 11, 2022
Threads
7
Messages
727
Reaction score
858
Location
Greenville, SC
Vehicles
22 CY R1T, 21 MachE GT
Occupation
IT
Great comparison; I got rid of my M3LR for the R1T and completely agree with you. One thing I want to add though is that I personally think the “apply turning force” that Tesla uses is straight up dangerous, not to mention extremely uncomfortable. The Tesla RIPS out of the lane if you apply too much force and puts unnecessary strain on my back / shoulder since there’s no comfortable way to hold the wheel (if it was four spoke it would be easier). Holding the wheel with two hands at 10 and 3? Yea, it’s going to disengage or yell at you because you don’t have any turning force.
 

rraj2k81

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Threads
68
Messages
786
Reaction score
1,163
Location
Burlington, Ontario.
Vehicles
2022 Tesla Model S LR
The first thing Rivian needs to do to make Driver+ better is to decouple the Active Steering + ACC from mapped highways and enable it for all roads, similar to Tesla AP and most other ADAS in the market.

They can limit more advanced features (hands free, auto lane changes, etc) whenever they become available to mapped highways.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
stynes

stynes

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
419
Reaction score
773
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
2022 R1S LE
Clubs
 
The first thing Rivian needs to do to make Driver+ better is to decouple the Active Steering + ACC from mapped highways and enable it for all roads, similar to Tesla AP and most other ADAS in the market.

They can limit more advanced features (hands free, lane centering, etc) whenever they become available to mapped highways.
ACC isn't limited to mapped roads, just HA.
 

Sponsored

Jamuso

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Jul 9, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
272
Reaction score
347
Location
CT
Vehicles
Ridgeline
Occupation
Sr software engineer - manager
I'd open a ticket. There's definitely something in the vehicle that... senses? it's ability to turn on. That's why when it cuts off, it's 30-60 seconds before it's available again. It's like it has to make sure it's safe enough to re-enable.
agree, open a ticket. I started losing that ability earlier and my alignment issue was blocking that function. Once the alignment was fixed - i could use driver+
 

cjones1130

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
298
Reaction score
298
Location
Georgia
Vehicles
2017 Audi Q7 , 2023 Red Canyon Rivian R1T
The first thing Rivian needs to do to make Driver+ better is to decouple the Active Steering + ACC from mapped highways and enable it for all roads, similar to Tesla AP and most other ADAS in the market.

They can limit more advanced features (hands free, lane centering, etc) whenever they become available to mapped highways.
Agreed! Hoping this is something that happens sOOner rather than later!! No need to disable lane keep assist on unmapped roads.
 

Indy avocado

Well-Known Member
First Name
Greg
Joined
Dec 17, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
185
Reaction score
234
Location
Indiana
Vehicles
'22 R1T, '17 Macan S, '11 Mustang GT
There’s no traditional cruise control, it’s AC only so when the camera decides it’s done, you’re completely without cruise control at all.
I found this infuriating the other day driving on a quiet but slightly foggy interstate... had to drive for almost an hour w/o cruise control.

There’s no reasonable way to disable HA and leave AC working.
MADDENING! A "flick" up should kill HA and a full press up (like reverse) should kill both.

I just hate that changing lanes disables HA, quiets my music for a half second, produces an audible chime, then turns my music back up. It’s annoying.
I don't mind it as the driver, but I feel bad for my passengers constantly having the music/podcast interrupted.

Rivian has a touch sensitive wheel that Tesla doesn’t and this was SUPER nice.
Definitely better than having to constantly weight the wheel. Arguably safer to be because when it disconnects there's not a bias.

I had a couple of instances of phantom slowing in the Rivian. It eased up on the accelerator, dropped a few mph, and then re-engaged.
I got 1 phantom brake (lost 8-10mph in ~1 sec) in a middle lane on an open highway, but otherwise has been really good.


One other thing I'd like to see/tweak is when changing lanes, it should either reduce distance to the car ahead, or "unlock" from the car in the lane you're leaving quicker. I have to be fully over and stabilized before it will start accelerating for a pass, which is really annoying when there's a moderate amount of traffic. Once I'm half out of the lane I need it to GO!
 

rraj2k81

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Threads
68
Messages
786
Reaction score
1,163
Location
Burlington, Ontario.
Vehicles
2022 Tesla Model S LR
ACC isn't limited to mapped roads, just HA.
Rivians 'Driver+' is their full ADAS suite, which is made up of HA and ACC right now.
They will add more functionality with time as part of the Driver+ suite.

HA is ACC with Active Steering/Lane Centering.
And all Rivian is doing is enabling Active Steering/Lane Centering on mapped highways for HA and limiting to ACC for all other roads.

I would guess they will modify how hey name Driver+ as they add functionality, similar to what Tesla has done or doing right now, AP/EAP/FSD.
 

smiesguy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Nov 11, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
175
Reaction score
337
Location
O H I O
Vehicles
R1S / Escalade
Occupation
Planner
I've also used Tesla's AP and E(enhanced)AP extensively. EAP with the auto lane change on the highway was super helpful. I currently have a vehicle with GM's supercruise and just used it during a 400 mile roadtrip. Some of the same limitations as Driver + with mapped highways only, but I have to say where it works, it is the best by far. No hands required on the wheel, just eyesight tracking.
Sponsored

 
 








Top