C.R. Rivian
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Charles
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2020
- Threads
- 69
- Messages
- 695
- Reaction score
- 611
- Location
- South Puget Sound
- Vehicles
- Kia Niro EV...R1T Launch Edition, Gen1
- Occupation
- retired
- Thread starter
- #1
The journalist in this case just assumed the loss was due to low night-time temps - I'm sure there will be many others in the same boat making assumptions or not knowing something might be wrong. Rivian's OS needs to evolve to a point where it is able to say something like "X app is using significant battery power" so that the driver gets some sort of indication of something being the matter.The fact that they had to do the reset to fix charging probably indicates they were having issues with the truck that caused the phantom drain. Had they reset the first night at the camp, their phantom usage should have dropped significantly. Not excusing Rivian here, just explaining.
I’m sure the cadre of engineers at Rivian have totally never thought of just adding an on/off button.Would phantom drain still come into play if Rivian just added an on/off button?
The F150 has an on/off button and it does not have phantom drain.I’m sure the cadre of engineers at Rivian have totally never thought of just adding an on/off button.
I'm not sure if this is sarcasm because it really feels like it. Would solve a bunch of these problems it's not like it's some massive hassle to hit a button, and it's not worth 30-100kWh a month to not have to.I’m sure the cadre of engineers at Rivian have totally never thought of just adding an on/off button.
My Polestar 2 does not have an on/off button and it does not have phantom drain.The F150 has an on/off button and it does not have phantom drain.
It would since all contemporary vehicles, even ICE, have battery drain from always-on systems like security. When I wasn't driving much, I had to put a battery charger on my Subaru from time to time.Would phantom drain still come into play if Rivian just added an on/off button?
Agree, and if Rivian's OS sees that the truck is staying awake for too long without accessories on, without presence or GG or other mitigators it could defensively reset or at least notify the user. It's out of control.The journalist in this case just assumed the loss was due to low night-time temps - I'm sure there will be many others in the same boat making assumptions or not knowing something might be wrong. Rivian's OS needs to evolve to a point where it is able to say something like "X app is using significant battery power" so that the driver gets some sort of indication of something being the matter.
The same with many cars. But a 12V lead-acid battery is typically in the 600Wh range in good condition. A typical Rivian would blow through that entirely in just 8 hours, assuming 2.5kWh phantom drain per day, which is what I consistently measure (avg 104W of power consumption while doing nothing).It would since all contemporary vehicles, even ICE, have battery drain from always-on systems like security. When I wasn't driving much, I had to put a battery charger on my Subaru from time to time.