the long way downunder
Well-Known Member
The thing being no matter how it happened that they built a defective vehicle – it's a new line and these are hand built vehicles, so failure is excusable – there must be a dozen people in the sequence in a position designated to say "nope" before delivering it to the customer. In the context of the billions of dollars "burn" rate, the cost of any given vehicle is relatively trivial and the priority for now is to build perfect cars.Difference between slower production rates for "older" R1T's (earlier in ramp up) and those made with the line running faster (less time for in-process inspection) perhaps?
As a rule in any "quality" system, there are many people authorized to say "no" and very few people authorized to say "yes" … that's the question … what motivated someone in authority to approve delivery of a vehicle that has any defect that cannot be rectified in the field?
Sponsored
