Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
Fired Supercharger Maintenance Workers Say Network Will Fall Into Disrepair
Skeleton crew will have to fix any future problems.
Sharon Adarlo
Network Trouble
When Tesla CEO Elon Musk fired scores of employees in the past few weeks, he also got rid of practically everybody on the Supercharger team, who were working on developing the electric car company's vast network of EV chargers — predictably ticking off Tesla owners.
Now with Musk signaling he's shifting towards AI and robotaxis, recently fired ex-workers who serviced and maintained the chargers are sounding the alarm that the network is likely to decline, InsideEVs reports, because there aren't many service technicians left after Musk took a buzzsaw to the company roster.
"My personal opinion is that quality is going to deteriorate," an ex-worker told InsideEVs. "Customers are going to start seeing issues last longer than what they were used to."
Around the world, Tesla has upwards of 50,000 Supercharger stalls. It's unknown how many charger service technicians Tesla employed before this spate of brutal layoffs, but workers were apparently working around the clock and even skipping time with family, according to InsideEVs. Now imagine a skeleton screw trying to play whac-a-mole on any issues that may pop up in the Tesla Supercharger network.
"We couldn't keep up. And now the network is even larger," the former worker told InsideEVs. "Now, guess what? There are even more consumers. There's gonna be a lot more issues that could possibly come up."
https://futurism.com/the-byte/supercharger-maintenance-workers-network-disrepair
You need to get your facts straight. Tesla in November of 2022 opened their previously proprietary connector specifications for other manufacturers to adopt. EM hasn't donated anything to the "public." He controls nearly 100% of all NACS infrastructure and he charges non-Teslas more $$ to charge on the SC network (as I predicted).Tesla may have created the NACS standard, but they have clearly donated it to the public. No one is going to be beholden to Musk or Tesla, nor could they be, because Tesla made the NACS standard public domain. If you don't like Superchargers, don't use them! If you like NACS, but not Tesla, build your own NACS fast chargers, you owe zero royalty. Musk wants others to step up to the plate and do their part for the EV fast charging infrastructure. When he slows spending, who will step up to the plate and invest in fast charging infrastructure? Ford? GM? Stellantis? So far, it's all talk and no action.
I had suspected as much, but this is the first confirmation I’ve seen.Not good
I'm both a Tesla and a Rivian stockholder. Late last week my notice of the Tesla annual meeting arrived. With relish I voted AGAINST every proposal made by the Tesla board except one (appointing PWC as the external auditor) and FOR every proposal made by shareholders and opposed by Tesla except one (having board members terms be for one year only, which simply doesn't make for good governance IMO).It seems clear to me that Elon has entered the Boardroom and pulled the pin on a grenade. He will take out everything and everyone if he does not get his $55 Billion. Tesla Inc. is expendable. The customers are a nuisance. The Supercharger team head dared to push back on letting quality go out the window and was summarily executed in front the entire world.
tesla Inc. is flat-out F——d if they do not get rid of Elon first thing Monday. He is intent on wrecking the company piece by piece until he gets what he wants. It may soon come to a fast decision by Federal authorities to seize his companies- at least Tesla and SpaceX based on national security Issues.
Same. But with Tesla, I think the voting was just a formality. The board is too chummy with him and so there is no oversight. Tesla and Musk need oversight. There is no other way to right that ship. It is not just protection for its investors, large through small. It IS protection for their own good.I'm both a Tesla and a Rivian stockholder. Late last week my notice of the Tesla annual meeting arrived. With relish I voted AGAINST every proposal made by the Tesla board except one (appointing PWC as the external auditor) and FOR every proposal made by shareholders and opposed by Tesla except one (having board members terms be for one year only, which simply doesn't make for good governance IMO).
I hope that enough institutional investors do the same and the board gets the message that Musk is endangering the company, so that they somehow develop the courage to either rein him in or replace him.