CA EV rebate to launch July 1?

[tivoboy]

It does seem off that if rivian WERE NOT involved, how they managed to be one of the TWO OEM in CA that have an exemption on retail price not to exceed 50K.. I mean Tesla still builds a lot of cars here, and even though their official HQ might be in TX now, they are a builder and selling of cars in the state. Lucid is the other OEM excluded from the cap (I think maybe its up to 85K) but while their HQ IS still in the state, their entire production facility is in AZ.

So, CA COULD have possibly just picked OEM with HQ in the state, regardless of jobs for production or production in the state, but I would think to get on that list, SOME lobbying was done.

Sponsored

 

[runwithscissors]

Rivian did the same thing in NY with the "Drive Clean Rebate" 60+ models but Rivian missing. Audi, BMW, MB, Land Rover, Porsche all there but not Rivian...

 

[UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan]

It does seem off that if rivian WERE NOT involved, how they managed to be one of the TWO OEM in CA that have an exemption on retail price not to exceed 50K.. I mean Tesla still builds a lot of cars here, and even though their official HQ might be in TX now, they are a builder and selling of cars in the state. Lucid is the other OEM excluded from the cap (I think maybe its up to 85K) but while their HQ IS still in the state, their entire production facility is in AZ.

So, CA COULD have possibly just picked OEM with HQ in the state, regardless of jobs for production or production in the state, but I would think to get on that list, SOME lobbying was done.

Or they, the lawmakers, being predominantly D are snubbing Musk... for obvious reasons. Plus, since Tesla is no longer HQ'd in CA, it probably doesn't pay as much tax in CA than it did before. So why then would CA write a law to benefit a company that is no longer HQ'ed in the state?

Straight from InsideEVs article:

Tesla was founded in Silicon Valley and still makes cars at its original Fremont, California, factory. But in 2021 Elon Musk moved the carmaker's headquarters from Palo Alto to Austin, Texas, so it won't get the benefits of the special carve-out. Many versions of its new cars fall under the price cap anyway.

But Tesla and other automakers may take issue with the special status given to California-based companies. State lawmakers seem to expect some pushback, clarifying in the bill: "If a court of competent jurisdiction holds that the application of paragraph (2) is invalid, the remainder of this section shall remain in force and effect as if this section had not included paragraph (2)."

The possibility is there, so is the possibility of reading too much into what is not known.

Sponsored