I love my battery powered lawn mower. (And my battery powered truck.) I love never needing to change the oil or even go to a gas station. Love it. The annual bullcrap with my mower is over. The last-minute run out to the gas station so I can mow will never happen again. Battery power is so much better than gas power. So much better. IMO, of course.So EVs doomed Volkswagen, so therefore no other company can do EVs because they were never meant to be, so EVs will die out soon and we can go back to putting gasoline in our vehicles?
$11B is a lot of money, but VW is worth a lot more than that. These nothing burger, short-sighted headlines are getting annoying. I don't foresee VW closing shop anytime soon.
There is a world where ICE and EVs can coexist. They each have their benefits, and people are allowed to have preferences. I was more poking fun at the desire of some people/industries to see EVs die off and jumping at every opportunity to forecast a potential downfall of another EV automaker or blame a legacy automakers troubles on EVs.I love my battery powered lawn mower. (And my battery powered truck.) I love never needing to change the oil or even go to a gas station. Love it. The annual bullcrap with my mower is over. The last-minute run out to the gas station so I can mow will never happen again. Battery power is so much better than gas power. So much better. IMO, of course.
Somewhat in support of your comment within the articleI browsed the VW financials and don't see what the author is talking about. I'm not as up-to-date on European financial reporting as US based, but VW looks profitable with positive operating cash flow.
Maybe they've committed to more investments & capex than they can swallow? That's a pretty solvable problem if so.
I do question their continued investment in Scout. That's a multi-billion capital hole for another high-priced offroad EV that won't sell in enough volume to offset development costs. They'd get better value for their money by just buying Rivian at this point.
Very true. In another 10~15 years, I believe EV will be the dominant automobiles. ICE vehicles will exists but as a luxury item. EVs will be so much cheaper and cheaper to operate than ICE.There is a world where ICE and EVs can coexist. They each have their benefits...
The South Carolina plant they are building will also build Audi (and possibly Porsche Macan) SUVs and are in discussion to be customer spec build facility (e.g., Magna Styer for those that do not want to build a factory in US to avoid tariff due to smaller numbers) in addition to Scout vehicles based on what I've read on several auto industry publications (e.g., Automotive News)...I do question their continued investment in Scout. That's a multi-billion capital hole for another high-priced offroad EV that won't sell in enough volume to offset development costs. They'd get better value for their money by just buying Rivian at this point.
I agree with the idea but I think it'll be more like 25-30 years before ICE is a novelty item.Very true. In another 10~15 years, I believe EV will be the dominant automobiles. ICE vehicles will exists but as a luxury item. EVs will be so much cheaper and cheaper to operate than ICE.
I think you're bit out of date there......What I have heard is that the Nissan is in deep, and the Honda merger may not save the brand. Daimler Chrysler is not much better, but Mercedes does have a new motor that is ridiculous and could be a game-changer in aviation or EVs.
When I can buy an oil rig/oil refinery and gas tank with a pump, I will support gas vehicles.So EVs doomed Volkswagen, so therefore no other company can do EVs because they were never meant to be, so EVs will die out soon and we can go back to putting gasoline in our vehicles?
$11B is a lot of money, but VW is worth a lot more than that. These nothing burger, short-sighted headlines are getting annoying. I don't foresee VW closing shop anytime soon.