Rivianero
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Brent
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2024
- Threads
- 19
- Messages
- 313
- Reaction score
- 346
- Location
- San Marcos TX
- Vehicles
- 2022 R1T quad large
Also a long time Aptera supporter, investor, res holder. Have the t-shirt and follow their progress.
Like some of the others, my investment is more of a vote that I would like a world with solar EV in it. It is fascinating what they have done from an engineering perspective. There are several key elements that are pretty revolutionary with respect to current vehicles. I respect Aptera's engineering.
My original res was for the dual motor 250 mile version, and I would really prefer a model with some of the off-road "pants" they teased at some point.
I do think they made a mistake of choosing 400 miles for the launch version. It raises the price beyond what many feel the autocycle is worth. A 250 mile vehicle that completely recharges in 20 minutes for under $30k sounds like a good market entry. By going big Aptera is ignoring minimum viable product principles.
I also am somewhat disappointed that they abandoned in-wheel motors this past year. This greatly complicates the mechanical aspects of the vehicle, as well as user-repairability. I recognize that is a function of the motor manufacturer not being able to deliver to spec and price point. Still disappointing.
I have since bought my R1T and recognize that it, aside from efficiency and solar charging, runs circles around the Aptera in every way. Paid less for my salvaged R1T, than a new Aptera.
I need a truck for ranch work and insurance costs discourage me from having more than 1 vehicle. Doubt I will ever buy an Aptera, but I'm not going to cancel my res or cash out my investment. I want this to exist. I want it to cause other manufacturers to reconsider what they produce. IF delivered at an affordable price point, Aptera's would be a great solution for many people's needs.
Like some of the others, my investment is more of a vote that I would like a world with solar EV in it. It is fascinating what they have done from an engineering perspective. There are several key elements that are pretty revolutionary with respect to current vehicles. I respect Aptera's engineering.
My original res was for the dual motor 250 mile version, and I would really prefer a model with some of the off-road "pants" they teased at some point.
I do think they made a mistake of choosing 400 miles for the launch version. It raises the price beyond what many feel the autocycle is worth. A 250 mile vehicle that completely recharges in 20 minutes for under $30k sounds like a good market entry. By going big Aptera is ignoring minimum viable product principles.
I also am somewhat disappointed that they abandoned in-wheel motors this past year. This greatly complicates the mechanical aspects of the vehicle, as well as user-repairability. I recognize that is a function of the motor manufacturer not being able to deliver to spec and price point. Still disappointing.
I have since bought my R1T and recognize that it, aside from efficiency and solar charging, runs circles around the Aptera in every way. Paid less for my salvaged R1T, than a new Aptera.
I need a truck for ranch work and insurance costs discourage me from having more than 1 vehicle. Doubt I will ever buy an Aptera, but I'm not going to cancel my res or cash out my investment. I want this to exist. I want it to cause other manufacturers to reconsider what they produce. IF delivered at an affordable price point, Aptera's would be a great solution for many people's needs.
Sponsored