Huh? It does have lane keep assist. As for further development on gen1’s Driver+, not happening ever. They’ve moved on and gen1 production ended late spring of ‘24. Makes no financial sense for them to devote resources to a soon-to-be minority of all customers.
I meant lane centering
clearly they have the hardware to use it on more roads since all you need is the front cam?
Class action lawyers fishing for a pay day. If it goes anywhere, it would be settled out of court so Rivian doesn’t have to own up to anything. A nice fat check for law firm, a few cents for each class participant. Click bait for bloggers and stock shorts.I meant lane centering
And financially, I keep getting these lawyer ads for "did Rivian promise you self driving?" So who knows?
Yep, it’s the same MobilEye hardware as Tesla Autopilot 1.0 and Ford’s ADAS on Mach-E vehicles without BlueCruise hardware. Both of those can do lane-centering on any road with well-defined lines.
Are you absolutely certain about this? I've just been talking to a friend who bought a 2015 Model S, which he said is hardware 1, and it does more than my Rivian does.
I think it's actually better. From what I can see, AP1 used the Mobileye EyeQ3, and Rivian Gen 1 uses the Mobileye EyeQ4 Mid.
In which case, it would mean that Rivian specifically and consciously chose to cripple it. He says it works almost anywhere. I haven't been out there to drive it myself yet. He drove my HW3 Tesla 3 and said that was better, but not by a huge margin.
I’ll say it. “Never forget the lies we were told on Gen 1. Get a Comma and unlock what they don’t want you to have!” I go to Rivian jail now.I'm tired of being accused of being a paid shill.
