Sponsored

LaunchGreen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
543
Reaction score
1,128
Location
California
Vehicles
Range Rover
I just showed my work, feel free to poke holes. Basically, two reasons: 1) Uncle Sam took 40% of the profit, $15/share, and 2) they repurchased shares at $97 that were previously owned for $78.

If they just sold and went away, they made $23/share after taxes, but then they repurchased shares at a higher cost.

Yes, but their cost-basis is now higher which reduces their taxes on their next sale.
Sponsored

 

Monkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
538
Reaction score
731
Location
Colorado
Vehicles
Tesla Y, Ford F-350 and lots more…
Occupation
Software Developer
Yep, DSP was outside of any other accounts we may have already had. I didn't want to leave 175 shares just hanging there by themselves. Yes, I could transfer and would have a low base of $78/share for those 175 shares. In retrospect I should have just moved my shares rather than selling them. By doing what I did and since it seems I'm going to owe about $2650 in tax on my gains from the sale, I have only lowered my basis in the 250 total shares by a few $/share. 250 shares @ $81~$82/share after taxes are paid and the dust settles.

If I didn't have such a smooth brain, I would have bought the 250 @ $97 and transferred the 175. Thus giving me 425 shares at an average cost of $89/share. Now I have to wait for funds to transfer back to where I want to use them and then see if I can or want to still buy more. If the stock price remains $100+, then I just totally hosed myself today.
 

kurtlikevonnegut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
2,724
Reaction score
7,543
Location
SC/TX
Vehicles
2023 R1S DM, Honda Odyssey
Clubs
 
Am I the only one that uses a Roth IRA stock account for things like this? No worries of long-term or short-term capital gains!
I will probably transfer whatever portion of stock I hold into my Roth when I feel the value has leveled out.
 
OP
OP

xyskis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
181
Reaction score
256
Location
Pacific NW
Vehicles
R1S, 4Runner, Sprinter
Occupation
Surgeon, engineer
Meeting delivery goals isn't a money problem. Rivian has plenty of money in the bank right now.
Also not entirely sure what you mean by this; my understanding was that the IPO funds would help with internal investment in the form of additional factories, expanded R&D, and to support and/or accelerate the production ramp.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP

xyskis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
181
Reaction score
256
Location
Pacific NW
Vehicles
R1S, 4Runner, Sprinter
Occupation
Surgeon, engineer

Scoiatael

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2021
Threads
49
Messages
1,162
Reaction score
1,816
Location
Southern CA
Vehicles
2025 R1S, 2024 Mach E
Also not entirely sure what you mean by this; my understanding was that the IPO funds would help with internal investment in the form of additional factories, expanded R&D, and to support and/or accelerate the production ramp.
It will help future deliveries in 2-3 years, but will do little to solve what they are working on right now. There is a supply chain issue that money won't fix, and production hell which is something they have to figure out rather than dump money into.
 

LaunchGreen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
543
Reaction score
1,128
Location
California
Vehicles
Range Rover
Paying more for basis to reduce future tax liability is an interesting investing strategy....that's like saying I try to make less money to reduce my tax bill.

That's a misrepresentation. By your own math the person a) took a $4 profit b) has the same number of shares c) reduced further tax liability by increasing basis. By any measure better off than not doing it.
 

Sponsored

Dbeglor

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
511
Reaction score
828
Location
TX
Vehicles
Yes
That's a misrepresentation. By your own math the person a) took a $4 profit b) has the same number of shares c) reduced further tax liability by increasing basis. By any measure better off than not doing it.
Yep, I never claimed it wasn't a profitable trade. It made $700.
 

jjwolf120

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Feb 25, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
791
Reaction score
1,133
Location
Arcadia
Vehicles
Rivian R1S
Occupation
TPA

simpsonhomer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
102
Reaction score
165
Location
Washington, DC
Vehicles
R1S LE, Model S Plaid
That is not my understanding. There is no write-off. It is like you never sold for a loss.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/washsalerule.asp
You add the amount of the loss (from the first transaction) to the cost basis of the second transaction, effectively reducing your taxable profit by that amount.

So you can't write off the loss on the first transaction, but you reduce the taxable profit on the second transaction.

Check out the example at https://www.schwab.com/resource-center/insights/content/a-primer-on-wash-sales
 

jjwolf120

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Feb 25, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
791
Reaction score
1,133
Location
Arcadia
Vehicles
Rivian R1S
Occupation
TPA
You add the amount of the loss (from the first transaction) to the cost basis of the second transaction,
A simpler way to think of it, is that your cost basis remains the same. It is like you never sold the stock.
Sponsored

 
 








Top