atebit
Well-Known Member
In 2022, I think it’s hard to compare Tesla’s SC experience with Rivian. When I got my first Tesla in 2014 I was literally five minutes away from the SC, so I had no worries. Initially, Tesla was high on the Ranger thing, but as that model got oversubscribed they backed down on it pretty quickly. But at the same time, they were expanding their SC footprint at a good pace.
Rivian on the other hand only has like, what, 20 SCs across the entire country? They should’ve realized that there would be a tipping point (and reasonably calculated what that would be) of the number of trucks on the road vs their ability to service them, at a local SC , via mobile service or through remote pickup/drop-off.
IMHO, they need to amp up their game on what mobile service should be capable of. If the work plan doesn’t require a lift, mobile service ought to be able to handle it. Heck, they could even work with Bendpak to come up with a Rivian-capable Quick Jack to handle minor jack-up work in the field.
People keep saying that Aglie requires “out of the box” thinking, but it seems like not enough of this reasoning is occurring before the decision’s made to just foist it all onto the customer.
Rivian on the other hand only has like, what, 20 SCs across the entire country? They should’ve realized that there would be a tipping point (and reasonably calculated what that would be) of the number of trucks on the road vs their ability to service them, at a local SC , via mobile service or through remote pickup/drop-off.
IMHO, they need to amp up their game on what mobile service should be capable of. If the work plan doesn’t require a lift, mobile service ought to be able to handle it. Heck, they could even work with Bendpak to come up with a Rivian-capable Quick Jack to handle minor jack-up work in the field.
People keep saying that Aglie requires “out of the box” thinking, but it seems like not enough of this reasoning is occurring before the decision’s made to just foist it all onto the customer.
Sponsored