OrthoBlock
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2021
- Threads
- 8
- Messages
- 133
- Reaction score
- 224
- Location
- Philly Area
- Vehicles
- R1T, X5 PHEV
- Thread starter
- #1
Based on some simple math, related to an analysis I did for a different thread:
https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/threads/quad-motor-vs-locking-diff.12010/post-271827
it appears that the acceleration on the trucks appears to be purely power limed as opposed to traction limited. This helps explain the faster 0-60 times for the 21" and 22" wheels vs. 20" wheels, as the former have smaller diameter and thereby higher effective gearing (i.e., shorter torgue arm at the tire.)
This made me wonder if anyone had tried running the same aspect ratio tires as on the 22" wheels (275/50) on the 20" wheels, which would result in ~31" tire.
My understanding is that the stock diameters are approximately:
34" - for 20" wheels
33" - for 21" wheels
33 - for 22" wheels
So a 31" tire would result in creased force to the ground of anywhere from 9.5% to 6.5% (compared to 34" and 33" tires, respectively). Could this increase in available forward force be enough to get 0-60 in less than 3 seconds? Has anyone tried?
They seem to make plenty of tires in the 275/50R20 size...
p.s., I do realize this is a very simplified analysis, and I have no idea on the linearity of the torque curve on the motors with respect to RPM's (my expectations would be that immediate acceleration times would be faster, but longer times over distance, like the quarter mile, might even be slower -- not sure.)
p.p.s., I also realize that this is a completely silly question, as the acceleration speed of a pick-up truck over any distance is hardly worth losing sleep over. It's more of a fun mental curiosity on how first order physics might affect real-world vehicles...
https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/threads/quad-motor-vs-locking-diff.12010/post-271827
it appears that the acceleration on the trucks appears to be purely power limed as opposed to traction limited. This helps explain the faster 0-60 times for the 21" and 22" wheels vs. 20" wheels, as the former have smaller diameter and thereby higher effective gearing (i.e., shorter torgue arm at the tire.)
This made me wonder if anyone had tried running the same aspect ratio tires as on the 22" wheels (275/50) on the 20" wheels, which would result in ~31" tire.
My understanding is that the stock diameters are approximately:
34" - for 20" wheels
33" - for 21" wheels
33 - for 22" wheels
So a 31" tire would result in creased force to the ground of anywhere from 9.5% to 6.5% (compared to 34" and 33" tires, respectively). Could this increase in available forward force be enough to get 0-60 in less than 3 seconds? Has anyone tried?
They seem to make plenty of tires in the 275/50R20 size...
p.s., I do realize this is a very simplified analysis, and I have no idea on the linearity of the torque curve on the motors with respect to RPM's (my expectations would be that immediate acceleration times would be faster, but longer times over distance, like the quarter mile, might even be slower -- not sure.)
p.p.s., I also realize that this is a completely silly question, as the acceleration speed of a pick-up truck over any distance is hardly worth losing sleep over. It's more of a fun mental curiosity on how first order physics might affect real-world vehicles...
Sponsored