Sponsored

How close do you think real world range will be to EPA range?

The Real World Range will be...


  • Total voters
    77

RforRivian

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2020
Threads
24
Messages
123
Reaction score
631
Location
Birmingham, AL
Vehicles
2012 4Runner, 2014 Equinox
It's becoming clear that EPA ranges vary widely from real world range depending on the manufacturer. So what is your prediction for Rivian. Will they fluff their numbers, get pretty close, or exceed the EPA range? Make your prediction above!

Edit: For clarification this is just asking what you expect to get for your driving style and typical conditions in your area of the country.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

Drterreur

Well-Known Member
First Name
Francois
Joined
Mar 9, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
94
Reaction score
239
Location
Québec city
Vehicles
Tesla model3 Dual motor
Occupation
Healthcare
I have been burned by Tesla before which was on the overly optimistic side and my commute is less than ideal. I would be suprised, in my situation to see anything better than 25% less than EPA.

In Canada, there are 2 seasons. Winter and preparation for the next winter. Heating decreases significantly the mileage we can achieve on each charge, making EPA numbers almost impossible to achieve. I hope Rivian do better in that regard.
 

CommodoreAmiga

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2020
Threads
39
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
7,711
Location
INACTIVE
Vehicles
INACTIVE
Weather alone will cause a larger than 10% swing in efficiency.
 

Reed

Well-Known Member
First Name
Reed
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Threads
9
Messages
126
Reaction score
179
Location
Burnaby, BC, Canada
Vehicles
2002 Toyota Tacoma, March/24 Reservation for R2
Occupation
Retired
I opted for over 10% less than EPA range. In general, I expect to drop more than 10% in the winter and more like 5% in the summer.

However, I do very little city driving. And, I'll be driving a lot faster than that 48 mph they use in calculating the EPA rating. And, I'll be doing that driving on the 20 inch rims with off-road tires. So, ya, throw in some cold weather and driving on logging roads, likely leaves me with considerably less than the EPA rating.

Which is why, in my last update, I switched to the extra large double double battery.
 

Jsidell

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
203
Reaction score
794
Location
TX
Vehicles
LE R1T
Our E-Tron Sportback advertised an EPA estimated 220mi...we get maybe 175mi on a full charge...

My hope is these Rivians don't fall that far behind the EPA estimates...we'll "seen soon"
 

Sponsored

DucRider

Well-Known Member
First Name
Gary
Joined
Oct 21, 2019
Threads
17
Messages
1,657
Reaction score
3,156
Location
ORegon
Vehicles
Polestar 2, Ioniq, R1S
Before I can even hope to answer this, you need to put some kind of a definition on "real world".

70 degrees on dry and clear roads with mixed city and hwy?
80 mph on the freeway towing a travel trailer in sub-freezing temps?
70 mph steady freeway driving?
30 mile commute in mostly stop and go?

In Canada, there are 2 seasons. Winter and preparation for the next winter. Heating decreases significantly the mileage we can achieve on each charge, making EPA numbers almost impossible to achieve. I hope Rivian do better in that regard.
Unlikely. Physics dictates this to a large degree. Anyone looking at the EPA numbers needs to use it as a baseline and tool to compare to other vehicles. You need to factor in your climate and individual use case. Any standardized test is not going to be valid under all condition - an owner using it around town in San Diego is going to achieve different results than one in a part of the country that has winter and does a lot of freeway driving.

I live in the relatively mild PNW climate. In spring and fall under conditions similar to the EPA test it has been easy to far exceed the EPA number (in fact pretty darn close to the raw numbers before derating). I Summer, the EPA number is pretty realistic. In winter, as much as 40% off of the EPA. This is based on over 7 years with different EVs.

I dont know of any manufacturer that "fluffs" their numbers. The differing results vs "real world" are a result of the limitations of the defined test procedures.

Tesla tends to build to the test at least a little bit. I don't see Rivian doing that based on the type of testing we have seen them perform. However, they seem to be making some changes to the pack/design to hit the promised marks - 300+ and 400+ miles. The 135 kWh pack is now the Large Pack and "a little smaller" than the previously published 135 kWh. Were they getting too much range? Not enough differentiation for the additional $10K for the Max Pack?
 

Trandall

Well-Known Member
First Name
Travis
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
1,137
Reaction score
2,078
Location
Upstate NY
Vehicles
Rivian R1T, 2023 Mach-E
Occupation
Construction Management
The real world range will likely be "close to EPA range" when driving at 68 deg. F. Non aggressive town driving may even exceed.
I think to answer the essence of the question however "real world" will likely be 10-50% less than EPA depending on "spirited" driving, cold temps., loose terrain (off road/ snow), towing.
EPA range and efficiency ratings for ev's are possibly useful as a metric for comparison but not so much to indicate actual performance.
 

Trandall

Well-Known Member
First Name
Travis
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
1,137
Reaction score
2,078
Location
Upstate NY
Vehicles
Rivian R1T, 2023 Mach-E
Occupation
Construction Management
DucRider, Totally agree. You stated it a little clearer than I.
 

RivianXpress

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2020
Threads
89
Messages
780
Reaction score
1,432
Location
West Coast
Vehicles
R1T, Sprinter, TE300i, R1250GSA, KTM 500, 790
Occupation
Retired Engineer


Summary: Model-Y = 234 miles, Mach-E =268 miles, WOW... Another reason why EPA rating system is a joke
 

kanundrum

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2020
Threads
218
Messages
3,988
Reaction score
12,156
Location
Washington, DC
Vehicles
Giulia QV, R1S (S00N)
Occupation
IT
Clubs
 
However, they seem to be making some changes to the pack/design to hit the promised marks - 300+ and 400+ miles. The 135 kWh pack is now the Large Pack and "a little smaller" than the previously published 135 kWh. Were they getting too much range? Not enough differentiation for the additional $10K for the Max Pack?
So I would agree but also think about kW/m rating. If the vehicle is very inefficient (2.8kW/M) and lets say as a 125 kWH pack with 115 usable that still puts the vehicle at 322 miles. I am hoping for at least a 3.0 average efficiency due to size, rolling resistance (I assume the vehicle EPA figures will be based on ECO tires) and weight of the vehicle I think the 300 figure (again depending on pack size) should be pretty stout even in a worse case scenario with a somewhat not crap efficiency rating.
 

Sponsored

azbill

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Threads
14
Messages
1,287
Reaction score
1,579
Location
Arizona
Vehicles
R1T, Mach E, Hummer EV SUT
Occupation
Engineer
Any number like mile/KWH or W/mile, is just an estimate based on EPA and is completely variable. Many factors affect the efficiency.
 

Trandall

Well-Known Member
First Name
Travis
Joined
Jan 13, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
1,137
Reaction score
2,078
Location
Upstate NY
Vehicles
Rivian R1T, 2023 Mach-E
Occupation
Construction Management
Is that a typo?

**EDIT**

You have towing in there too...
Not a typo... Even without towing I would not be surprised to find 50% reduction when driving on unplowed snow in 14 deg. F. common in the north.
 

slawwach

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
150
Reaction score
225
Location
TN
Vehicles
Jaguar I-Pace, Hyundai Santa Cruz
Personally I'm most interested in average highway only range. City range for EVs is kind of useless in my opinion since 95% of the people will charge at home.
I agree. I'm hoping R1T LE will do 240-250 miles on the interstate.
Sponsored

 
 




Top