Ok, this is the key.... You said Graph - there was a change to the graph metrics recently that it now will include the Regen offset where it has not in the past. This is why recently you've been seeing people with graphs showing above 4mi/kwh where we never had before. Although, this change occurred with 2025.06, so I'm wondering if you just hadn't noticed until now.
This is a useful feature, as one can now tell if regen is limited by cold when going downhill from a mountain when blended braking is turned on. I often drive my truck up high only to lose energy to the cold when driving back down due to regen turning off.
The Blizzaks were so smooth and quiet. They spoiled me.
Thanks. I don't really care about winter performance as I've been running Blizzak LT on a separate set of wheels. Asked here as I wasn't sure if you were on the nAT thread. And yes, I also observed the stock tires getting more efficient as they wore, up to as much as 2.34 mi/kWh (over 2.2k miles) when I pulled them off again in November and around 6/32nds with 20k miles.
I notice the Blizzaks LT are surprisingly efficient on a warm day (50-60F) and the HVAC temperature control turned off. I did a 15 mile roundtrip with over 600 ft elevation change and got over 2.5 mi/kWh. And yes, they are so damn quiet compared with the Pirelli ATs.For the record, I have a 2023 QM R1T on 20ā wheels and was running my Blizzak winter tires from mid December until last week. I have now changed back to my OEM Pirelli A/Tās. I have not experienced any noticeable difference in efficiency between the two tires, but the annoying drone from the Pirellis will drive me FN crazy
Except you ignored the part where I used 25% versus 35% SoC.
Back to either the December or January update they started doing something goofy with the reported battery capacity as evidenced by ElectraFi data on the battery graph. That change resulted in some weirdness on reporting phantom drain. It's possible this update reverted that change, but I don't have enough data yet to be able to tell. That said, I haven't seen any major change in efficiency that I can't attribute to dramatically warmer weather and using HVAC with temperature control turned off.
Where abouts can I find similar data in ElectraFi? We can see if it tracks with yours.
Under Charges and then Battery Report. It doesn't track battery capacity directly, but you can see that on the top bar with all the other current status items and if you watch it enough you'll see it dip and rise seemingly at random, but seems to be correlated at least somewhat on outside temperature or possibly battery temperature. IIRC, I've seen as low as 125 kWh, but prior to the update at the end of December 2024 (2024.47.1) it was always within a small range 130-131 kWh.
Interesting. I don't have software markers in mine.Under Charges and then Battery Report. It doesn't track battery capacity directly, but you can see that on the top bar with all the other current status items and if you watch it enough you'll see it dip and rise seemingly at random, but seems to be correlated at least somewhat on outside temperature or possibly battery temperature. IIRC, I've seen as low as 125 kWh, but prior to the update at the end of December 2024 (2024.47.1) it was always within a small range 130-131 kWh.
I agree!
