Sponsored

TAZ

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Nov 23, 2020
Threads
2
Messages
105
Reaction score
106
Location
Denver
Vehicles
R1T LE
It was an interesting read but they missed the end of the story. What happens to the batteries, recycling of parts when the vehicles are end of life. That would have provided the complete picture otherwise great info.
 

COdogman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jan 21, 2022
Threads
33
Messages
11,641
Reaction score
34,497
Location
CO
Vehicles
2023 R1T
Occupation
Cyber defender
Clubs
 
Great article. EV production isn’t perfect, but it will get more sustainable over time. Until then we should do what we can. Memes are not the best way to get information about pretty much anything :CWL:
 

MountainBikeDude

Well-Known Member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Threads
54
Messages
3,342
Reaction score
7,112
Location
Vancouver
Vehicles
2023 El Cap Quad Motor R1T (Selling the Xterra)
Clubs
 

HighVoltOverland

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
752
Reaction score
1,564
Location
Laguna Beach
Vehicles
GW/OC R1T | Tesla MY
Occupation
Retired-ish
Clubs
 
I think beyond the coal argument (and how due to efficiency it becomes a bit of a moot point) another important discussion to have with "sincere" naysayers is the consistent cycle of improvement and changes in battery chemistry.

While Lithium and Cobalt to come with concerns it is worth noting that there are alternate chemists being developed that could mitigate/ eliminate the need for rare earth metals.

I for one amvery excited and intrigued at the work being done with Grpahene-Aluminum Batteries
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coj

Sponsored

COdogman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jan 21, 2022
Threads
33
Messages
11,641
Reaction score
34,497
Location
CO
Vehicles
2023 R1T
Occupation
Cyber defender
Clubs
 
I think beyond the coal argument (and how due to efficiency it becomes a bit of a moot point) another important discussion to have with "sincere" naysayers is the consistent cycle of improvement and changes in battery chemistry.

While Lithium and Cobalt to come with concerns it is worth noting that there are alternate chemists being developed that could mitigate/ eliminate the need for rare earth metals.

I for one amvery excited and intrigued at the work being done with Grpahene-Aluminum Batteries
That’s a legitimate argument to have. Debating whether an EV is better or *worse* for the environment is just a waste of time.

I feel like the search for the ideal battery chemistry will be decades long and even by the time I leave this earth there will still be advancements being made. So I say buy what today’s improvement is, not waiting for the one 5 years from now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coj

RBR1S

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2022
Threads
21
Messages
400
Reaction score
478
Location
Kirkland, WA
Vehicles
R1S preorder holder; '14 JGC,'20 Subaru Crosstrek
Good article - BUT it also depends on what state you are charging your vehicle in. No not from 20% to 80%, but the STATE - eg Washington State. Vs oh, lets say Texas.

75% of electricity comes from renewable or non-fossil fuel sources in Washington; mostly hydro-power. Texas on the other hand only about 33% comes from renewable or non-fossil fuel sources; most from Natural Gas or Coal

So while you might be driving an EV, the same EV is "cleaner" depending on where you charge and where that power comes from. The numbers mentioned in the OPs article change dramatically based on that.

Rivian R1T R1S Keeping the media honest! "You're Being Lied to About Electric Cars" article by Motortrend 1670533049177


Rivian R1T R1S Keeping the media honest! "You're Being Lied to About Electric Cars" article by Motortrend 1670533098140
 

SANZC02

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bob
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Threads
50
Messages
7,469
Reaction score
12,808
Location
California
Vehicles
Tesla Model S, LE - R1S
Occupation
Retired
Good article - BUT it also depends on what state you are charging your vehicle in. No not from 20% to 80%, but the STATE - eg Washington State. Vs oh, lets say Texas.

75% of electricity comes from renewable or non-fossil fuel sources in Washington; mostly hydro-power. Texas on the other hand only about 33% comes from renewable or non-fossil fuel sources; most from Natural Gas or Coal

So while you might be driving an EV, the same EV is "cleaner" depending on where you charge and where that power comes from. The numbers mentioned in the OPs article change dramatically based on that.

1670533049177.png


1670533098140.webp
True but natural gas is by far the cleanest of fossil fuels and is mostly considered a clean fuel so the number really would be considered much higher than 33% in the comparison to gas and diesel fueled vehicles.
 

Count Orlok

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2022
Threads
185
Messages
2,577
Reaction score
5,387
Location
Wisconsin & New Mexico
Vehicles
2022 R1S/ 2024 INEOS Grenadier/ 1969 Ford / etc.
Occupation
retired
Clubs
 
cool cool... now compare the lifetime environmental impact of a four-horse buggy with a Karl Benz Mortorwagon.
 

Sponsored

SSteveEV

Well-Known Member
First Name
Spencer
Joined
Nov 3, 2022
Threads
7
Messages
1,320
Reaction score
1,795
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
R1T, etc
Clubs
 
I thought this article did a good job overall but another missing factor I think most ratings/comparisons gloss over is vampire drain. An EV driven 20k miles per year is a lot cleaner than an EV driven 2k mi/yr on a per mile basis. Anyone know if EPA ratings have a set number of miles per year used and factor that in?
Contemplated having a tesla as a car at a vacation home but ended up being pretty wasteful for such little use. (plan is to add solar to negate this eventually)

And yes I used the term "gloss over" directly after reading through a 48 page thread here on vampire drain, so I meant that more for sources outside of this forum haha
 

NormalLife

Well-Known Member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Sep 18, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
70
Reaction score
41
Location
Austin, TX
Vehicles
Audi A6, Audi e-tron
Occupation
Med Device
Good article - BUT it also depends on what state you are charging your vehicle in. No not from 20% to 80%, but the STATE - eg Washington State. Vs oh, lets say Texas.

75% of electricity comes from renewable or non-fossil fuel sources in Washington; mostly hydro-power. Texas on the other hand only about 33% comes from renewable or non-fossil fuel sources; most from Natural Gas or Coal

So while you might be driving an EV, the same EV is "cleaner" depending on where you charge and where that power comes from. The numbers mentioned in the OPs article change dramatically based on that.

1670533049177.png


1670533098140.webp
Yes, very good point. I do live in Texas and know the predominant energy sources in the state, especially with its own grid. I don't mean my next comment as something that everyone can do. Not everyone has the means (both logistically and cost wise), but Texas energy sources is one reason I have solar. Only one EV at the moment, but I still produce 100% or more of my electricity needs for my home... and I only charge the EV at home. I am still "on the grid" but trying to do my part to offset. Hopefully that makes my choice to go EV a little cleaner in this state! But, who really knows?
 

jollyroger

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeffrey
Joined
Apr 8, 2022
Threads
20
Messages
482
Reaction score
571
Location
California
Vehicles
Tesla model 3, R1T
Occupation
IT Manager
cool cool... now compare the lifetime environmental impact of a four-horse buggy with a Karl Benz Mortorwagon.
I still think EV wins. Don't horses fart as much as cows

Rivian R1T R1S Keeping the media honest! "You're Being Lied to About Electric Cars" article by Motortrend regular-show
 
 








Top