Sponsored

GreggVA

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
72
Reaction score
89
Location
Virginia
Vehicles
2022 R1T
First off, good job dad for a spontaneous Disney trip. Appreciate the write up and and the Rivian Roamer stats are great! Hope you continue to enjoy your R2!
Sponsored

 

Captain JB

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Oct 14, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
330
Reaction score
242
Location
Hermosa Beach, Ca.
Vehicles
Chevy Volt
Occupation
Retired Airline Pilot
Clubs
 
Thanks for all the good data. Wow, Vegas to Anaheim and back in one day! You are stronger than I am but that is a great test for sure.
 

forestwalker

Well-Known Member
First Name
Forest
Joined
Jan 20, 2026
Threads
7
Messages
194
Reaction score
260
Location
Battle Ground, WA
Vehicles
2023 R1S
Occupation
Ops Manager - Diesel Repair
Clubs
 
Yeah basically anything over 80 degrees outside and you'll want to avoid V3 superchargers if you can. V4 superchargers are much, much better in the heat. All superchargers are limited to 500 amps though, so if you can find an IONNA, Walmart, or MB location that would be best to get 600 amps.

Best to worse for R2:
  1. IONNA - Walmart - Mercedes Benz (Alpitronic HYC400 - 600 amps)
  2. Rivian (unclear if they're outputting 600 amps yet but most are rated to)
  3. Tesla V4 (500 amps but don't derate usually)
  4. Tesla V3 (500 amps but derates quickly)
  5. Being stranded
  6. Electrify America :CWL:
I kid of course. I hear there's some good EA stations out west.
Spot on.

Had to use an EA last week when the RAN in Madras OR went tango uniform, it was like watching paint dry... With 2 tired teenagers and 2 bored huskies.
 

rvnxyz001

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Jun 30, 2026
Threads
3
Messages
422
Reaction score
485
Location
USA
Vehicles
subaru
In a spontaneous decision Saturday afternoon, I decided to drive from Vegas to Anaheim to take my daughter to Disneyland on Sunday. Arrived Saturday evening, went to the park for about 9.5 hours Sunday before driving home that evening. Below are stats & thoughts on each leg of the trip. Data per Rivian Roamer.

Summary (there and back combined)
565.5 miles driven
204.82 kWh used
2.76 mi/kWh efficiency

Leg 1
Home (Las Vegas, NV) to Yermo, CA - 156.0 miles
SOC 82.3% -> 12.9%
Speed limit 70mph
Cruise control set to 75mph
Starting elevation: 3,028 feet
Ending: 1,914
High point: 4,721

1787593821595-ya.webp


The efficiency was definitely disappointing for this leg of the trip. I expected better, as this was worse than my 2022 Mach e has performed on the same drive, despite the R2 supposedly being more efficient. However, there were some minor mitigating factors hurting this trip. Started the drive at 103 degrees and ended in Yermo at 97, so it was quite hot. The HVAC, including the ventilated seats, were heavily utilized for much of this leg. We also faced a consistent headwind, steady 5mph with gusts over 25. This is a drive through mountains, so you get pretty drastic elevation changes.

Charging
This was also my first ever DCFC in the R2.
23 minutes to go from 12.9% to 69.8% SOC.

Unfortunately, I got a "Charging speed reduce. Speed limited by charging station" message as the Tesla Supercharger in Yermo did not allow me to utilize the full capabilities of the vehicle. So the peak charge rate was only 169.9kW but at least it did average over 137.

1787593329191-ra.webp

1787593252486-h3.webp


Leg 2
Yermo, CA to Anaheim, CA - 123.7 miles
SOC 69.8% -> 23.7%
Speed limit 70 (predominantly)
Cruise control set to 73mph (mostly)
Start 1,914 feet
End 136 feet
High point 4,183

1787593922992-3b.webp


Much better efficiency on this leg thanks to the pretty steady downhill after you get past the El Cajon summit, dropping from 4,183 feet to 136 feet in elevation. Still had the headwinds but by this time it was night and we were using less HVAC and benefitting from slightly lower speeds.

After charging at Disneyland using their level 2 ChargePoint station up to 100% SOC, I made the return trip home.

Leg 3
Disneyland to Jean, NV - 238.6 miles
SOC 100% to 10.4%
Speed limit 70mph
Cruise control set to 76mph
Start 128 feet
End 2,881 feet
High point 4,724

1787594104095-tk.webp


When we plugged in the navigation for this leg, I was surprised that the Rivian suggested not stopping until Jean, NV nearly 240 miles away and predicting we would end up there with 9% remaining. I thought for sure, based on the efficiency seen on the way to Anaheim, that I would be stopping in Baker, CA instead. However, as the drive went along, it became clear that I could make it to Jean pretty easily. I was happy with the 2.91mi/kWh efficiency on this leg with a net elevation gain of 2,722 feet.

Charging stop 2
12 minutes to go from 10.4% to 50.8% SOC

I didn't get any reduced speed messages this time, but still didn't see the peak speeds I would have expected. Overall though, solid performance with an average speed of 173.9 kW. Side note: this is a Terrible's branded stop that I had never been to before. It was basically a knock off Buc-ee's as it had 96 gas stalls and 64 superchargers.

1787594608568-br.webp


Leg 4
Jean, NV to Home - 47.2 miles
SOC 50.8% to 32.3%
Speed limit 70mph
Cruise control set to 76mph
Start 2,881 feet
End 3,028 feet
High point 4,183

1787594876047-fh.webp


FInal thoughts:
Overall, I think it performed largely as expected. I would have loved to see slightly better efficiency but this wasn't bad. It's also worth noting that the R2 and tires were still well within the break-in period as I started this journey with only 619 miles on the odometer. Charging could have been slightly better, especially at that first stop since the charger didn't give me full power, but again overall this was still a pretty good experience.

I utilized UHF for nearly the entire trip and it worked near flawlessly. I was actually quite surprised at how well this performed and surprised at how much I was able to relax and enjoy this feature. I have long been someone who has said I don't care about ADAS and how I wouldn't pay for this upgrade. However, it proved quite useful after a long day at Disney where I was exhausted. Probably wouldn't have paid for this feature, so I'm glad I got it as part of the Launch Edition package. Now I can't wait to see what the point to point looks like when it rolls out.

1787593238790-gg.webp


1787593321759-en.webp


1787593728093-v4.webp


1787593754830-73.webp
Did you use the conserve driving mode?
 

ENVErider

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tyler
Joined
May 2, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
262
Reaction score
245
Location
Oakland, CA
Vehicles
2022 R1T Launch Edition
Occupation
Mechanical Engineer
In a spontaneous decision Saturday afternoon, I decided to drive from Vegas to Anaheim to take my daughter to Disneyland on Sunday. Arrived Saturday evening, went to the park for about 9.5 hours Sunday before driving home that evening. Below are stats & thoughts on each leg of the trip. Data per Rivian Roamer.

Summary (there and back combined)
565.5 miles driven
204.82 kWh used
2.76 mi/kWh efficiency

Leg 1
Home (Las Vegas, NV) to Yermo, CA - 156.0 miles
SOC 82.3% -> 12.9%
Speed limit 70mph
Cruise control set to 75mph
Starting elevation: 3,028 feet
Ending: 1,914
High point: 4,721

1787593821595-ya.webp


The efficiency was definitely disappointing for this leg of the trip. I expected better, as this was worse than my 2022 Mach e has performed on the same drive, despite the R2 supposedly being more efficient. However, there were some minor mitigating factors hurting this trip. Started the drive at 103 degrees and ended in Yermo at 97, so it was quite hot. The HVAC, including the ventilated seats, were heavily utilized for much of this leg. We also faced a consistent headwind, steady 5mph with gusts over 25. This is a drive through mountains, so you get pretty drastic elevation changes.

Charging
This was also my first ever DCFC in the R2.
23 minutes to go from 12.9% to 69.8% SOC.

Unfortunately, I got a "Charging speed reduce. Speed limited by charging station" message as the Tesla Supercharger in Yermo did not allow me to utilize the full capabilities of the vehicle. So the peak charge rate was only 169.9kW but at least it did average over 137.

1787593329191-ra.webp

1787593252486-h3.webp


Leg 2
Yermo, CA to Anaheim, CA - 123.7 miles
SOC 69.8% -> 23.7%
Speed limit 70 (predominantly)
Cruise control set to 73mph (mostly)
Start 1,914 feet
End 136 feet
High point 4,183

1787593922992-3b.webp


Much better efficiency on this leg thanks to the pretty steady downhill after you get past the El Cajon summit, dropping from 4,183 feet to 136 feet in elevation. Still had the headwinds but by this time it was night and we were using less HVAC and benefitting from slightly lower speeds.

After charging at Disneyland using their level 2 ChargePoint station up to 100% SOC, I made the return trip home.

Leg 3
Disneyland to Jean, NV - 238.6 miles
SOC 100% to 10.4%
Speed limit 70mph
Cruise control set to 76mph
Start 128 feet
End 2,881 feet
High point 4,724

1787594104095-tk.webp


When we plugged in the navigation for this leg, I was surprised that the Rivian suggested not stopping until Jean, NV nearly 240 miles away and predicting we would end up there with 9% remaining. I thought for sure, based on the efficiency seen on the way to Anaheim, that I would be stopping in Baker, CA instead. However, as the drive went along, it became clear that I could make it to Jean pretty easily. I was happy with the 2.91mi/kWh efficiency on this leg with a net elevation gain of 2,722 feet.

Charging stop 2
12 minutes to go from 10.4% to 50.8% SOC

I didn't get any reduced speed messages this time, but still didn't see the peak speeds I would have expected. Overall though, solid performance with an average speed of 173.9 kW. Side note: this is a Terrible's branded stop that I had never been to before. It was basically a knock off Buc-ee's as it had 96 gas stalls and 64 superchargers.

1787594608568-br.webp


Leg 4
Jean, NV to Home - 47.2 miles
SOC 50.8% to 32.3%
Speed limit 70mph
Cruise control set to 76mph
Start 2,881 feet
End 3,028 feet
High point 4,183

1787594876047-fh.webp


FInal thoughts:
Overall, I think it performed largely as expected. I would have loved to see slightly better efficiency but this wasn't bad. It's also worth noting that the R2 and tires were still well within the break-in period as I started this journey with only 619 miles on the odometer. Charging could have been slightly better, especially at that first stop since the charger didn't give me full power, but again overall this was still a pretty good experience.

I utilized UHF for nearly the entire trip and it worked near flawlessly. I was actually quite surprised at how well this performed and surprised at how much I was able to relax and enjoy this feature. I have long been someone who has said I don't care about ADAS and how I wouldn't pay for this upgrade. However, it proved quite useful after a long day at Disney where I was exhausted. Probably wouldn't have paid for this feature, so I'm glad I got it as part of the Launch Edition package. Now I can't wait to see what the point to point looks like when it rolls out.

1787593238790-gg.webp


1787593321759-en.webp


1787593728093-v4.webp


1787593754830-73.webp
Thanks for sharing these details. A lot of fuss has been made about the R2 being noticeably less efficient than the MY and EPA ratings, but given the size and boxy shape, I still feel Rivian did a great job, and as an R1 owner, I'll say these are enviable efficiency numbers. My own lifetime efficiency is around 2.35kW/mi.
 

Sponsored

NoMoreGas71

Active Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
29
Reaction score
35
Location
Atlanta
Vehicles
Tesla Model S, Lexus TX 350, Chevy Trax
Thanks for all the good data. Wow, Vegas to Anaheim and back in one day! You are stronger than I am but that is a great test for sure.
He did it in 2 days. Left Saturday afternoon came back Sunday evening.
Sponsored

 
 








Top