Tesla FSD drives down railroad tracks, gets hit by train

[strykerwsu]

I once posted a identical copies of my review/comparison between Tesla and Rivian, particularly the Cybertruck. I was called a Tesla fanboy by Rivian bigots, and a Rivian fanboy by Tesla bigots. I was eventually banned from the Cybertruck forum for posting facts.

It is sad that everything is so right / wrong even when same info provided but perception through one's beliefs no longer allows analytical thought.

There is a fun game to play with people and lead them one direction and then pull carpet out from them just to see the crazy confused look.

Sponsored

 

[JM.]

Why does every single discussion on here about FSD eventually end with bro science?

Asks the master of ADAS bro science, lol!

 

[COdogman]

Asks the master of ADAS bro science, lol!

Says the guy who just admitted not caring if anything he says is true or not

 

[JM.]

So you posted that not caring if it’s accurate or not? Or where it came from? Super on-brand for you

And you posted a response not knowing EITHER whether the source was accurate or not, nor whether your claim was accurate, nor where any of it came from. Hilarious.

There is a fun game to play with people and lead them one direction and then pull carpet out from them just to see the crazy confused look.

Right, see the predictable and recycled responses. As above. Hilarious.

 

[COdogman]

And you posted a response not knowing EITHER whether the source was accurate or not, nor whether your claim was accurate, nor where any of it came from. Hilarious.

Not true. I know that Tesla has not released any actual data to be verified, so therefore the only options left are owner reporting or the ridiculous “stats” they claim prove their safety.

 

[bigsky]

Says the person who keeps bragging about how you don’t “need” proof it’s safe because you (1 person) hasn’t yet been in an accident

It sure as hell beats dumbasses who as I said, never so much as sniffed a Tesla, let alone own one, much less trying out FSD repeatedly, yet reading garbage online about FSD and such dumbasses, by golly, they sure therefore pretend to know more than we the actual FSD drivers. I have nothing but contempt for such people.

 

[bigsky]

I don't need studies or hard data because I have the best source of all, "trust me bro". I think you might want a refund on that degree.

I have two Teslas, both with FSD. I have used FSD plenty. Over several years. I know what it does, I know what it does not do. I myself do not fully trust it and always follow the advice to be ready. So no, I do not need data to tell me what I already know, and I sure as hell do not care to know what people who never have owned a Tesla, but by damn, have learned about FSD online and are such subject experts ( ) to tell me what FSD really is like. So yes, I know a lot more about FSD than a lot of FSD wannabe experts on here who have no firsthand experience with it whatsoever. None.

Drive a Tesla, use FSD, learn it, then opine; otherwise, shut your piehole because you know nothing, nada.

 

[Donald Stanfield]

I have two Teslas, both with FSD. I have used FSD plenty. Over several years. I know what it does, I know what it does not do. I myself do not fully trust it and always follow the advice to be ready. So no, I do not need data to tell me what I already know, and I sure as hell do not care to know what people who never have owned a Tesla, but by damn, have learned about FSD online and are such subject experts ( ) to tell me what FSD really is like. So yes, I know a lot more about FSD than a lot of FSD wannabe experts on here who have no firsthand experience with it whatsoever. None.

Drive a Tesla, use FSD, learn it, then opine; otherwise, shut your piehole because you know nothing, nada.

I know more than you, because I know that an anecdote from one person means jack shit about the safety profile of FSD. Trust me bro is not a source, and you haven't the faintest idea of what evidence looks like. I don't need firsthand experience to know how things are safety tested, and why they are tested that way. Maybe we should call up the FDA and have them test new medicines the bigsky way. Well this dude took it a couple times and didn't die, so it must be fine, push that out to the mass market immediately.

 

[ukyank]

Going to be real interesting as automated driving matures & is more prevalent across vehicles. Accidents will still inevitably occur & if they occur less frequently than the current accident rate it’s a big win for human safety, but will people’s lizard brains be able to accept that or just fight the technology anytime they hear of an automated car accident.

 

[bigsky]

100% agree ... and I'll take that as a compliment to my ability to observe the visual facts and logically connect the dots . As opposed to the WAG conspiracy theories positing that this was all faked to tarnish Tesla's FSD reputation, or for insurance purposes, or to prove the earth is flat, etc.

"Inferences are steps in logical reasoning, moving from premises to logical consequences; etymologically, the word infer means to "carry forward". Inference is theoretically traditionally divided into deduction and induction, a distinction that in Europe dates at least to Aristotle (300s BC). "

Except that in your case, it is fatally flawed.

 

[Donald Stanfield]

Going to be real interesting as automated driving matures & is more prevalent across vehicles. Accidents will still inevitably occur & if they occur less frequently than the current accident rate it’s a big win for human safety, but will people’s lizard brains be able to accept that or just fight the technology anytime they hear of an automated car accident.

Probably will have people in both camps. The difference between that day and the current discussion is the assumption that verifiable safety data will be published PROVING that the automated system is safer. No one driving a Rivian is a luddite, and personally, I believe these systems have the potential to help save lives SOMEDAY. That day isn't today, and it isn't via a vision-only system.

 

[COdogman]

It sure as hell beats dumbasses who as I said, never so much as sniffed a Tesla, let alone own one, much less trying out FSD repeatedly, yet reading garbage online about FSD and such dumbasses, by golly, they sure therefore pretend to know more than we the actual FSD drivers. I have nothing but contempt for such people.

I can tell you are really struggling with this concept, so I will give it one more shot.

Just because you personally have not experienced an accident while using FSD does not mean it is safe, or safer than human drivers in general.

Your cumulative miles would register pretty close to 0% of the total miles across all owners and are therefore statistically insignificant. Basing any definitive conclusion on a percentage that low is “garbage”.

Also, believing that one must own or drive or be in a committed relationship with a Tesla to comprehend basic statistics is “garbage”.

I fully expect you to reject these common sense concepts for ridiculous reasons, so please carry on

 

[JM.]

or just fight the technology anytime they hear of an automated car accident.

Well, here we are. Luckily it's only a couple of people so overall it seems promising.

 

[Rade]

I have witnessed my share of idiot drivers. I suspect 1) The FSD DID make the turn onto the railroad tracks and 2) The driver panicked and had no clue how to get out of the situation, so gunned it further along hoping the car would jump back off the tracks. Kind of like when people get stuck in a snow bank and think the only way out is forward.

 

[COdogman]

Well, here we are. Luckily it's only a couple of people so overall it seems promising.

Except no one here is anti-technology. Keep grasping at straws…

Sponsored