trainwreck517
Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2024
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 22
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
- Vehicles
- R1T, FJ40
- Thread starter
- #1
I've had my R1T for a few months now, and as many have noticed the subwoofer performance is subpar in the in-house audio setup. I had really hoped to see an OTA update with a subwoofer gain added to the EQ, but got tired of waiting and decided to experiment with upgrading the factory 6X9 Subwoofer.
There are not really many options for a 6X9 Sub, but I decided to 1st experiment with a Rockville RVL69W 150W/300W "subwoofer". Not sure I really consider it a subwoofer, but figure for the price I'd give it a shot.
I was able to get the RVL69W to fit in the factory box with some finessing.
Inner tab needs to be cut, and box needs to be heated an press downwards:
Subwoofer fitment was also off in which the OEM box is slightly more narrow than the RVL69W speaker, so I also had to heat the oval edge to get the speaker to sit inside. I had to grind two of the speaker holes to align with the OEM box. and then used some urethane caulking to seal the speaker to the enclosure.
Routing power was pretty straight forward, used a grommet on the firewall to route the cable. Trick for me was to pull out the grommet itself, and cut the end off to allow me to feed the wire:
I used a soundstream PN1.650D mono 650W amp, factory sub wiring feeding the high input.
Sub is mounted in the storage area, and remote mounted by the driver side knee area.
Overall I am pleased with the results, low end bass is definitively better at least 2X from the factory but its not as crisp as a 10 sub. I suspect some of that has to do with the limitations of the factory box.
I should have done a 150-20Hz sweep before and after, but didn't think of that until after. I did play a 15 second clip from Big Tymers - Still Fly 2:45 to 3:00 as the base hit at 2:53 is one of the more memorable ones I could recall in a song.
Top is factory, bottom is RVL69W, you can see from about 110Hz picks up a few DB, an carries nicely in the low 10-40Hz range. This is same EQ settings base at 0, sub gain slightly higher so that the song sounds good to my personal ear (not maxed out) and volume at 15.
Increasing the sub volume, even without distortion cause all kinds of rattles within the car and just doesn't sound good. I just wanted something slightly better than stock. At least something comparable to my previous 2018 Model 3, and this setup meets and exceeds that goal. Bass hits much stronger than my model 3 ever did.
I regret not experiment with getting a smaller amp and trying to use the factory subwoofer, not sure what the results would have been but would have been interesting.
Guess the questions to close this out:
1. I am happy results? Yes, though I wished I would have experimented with the factory speaker 1st.
2. Would I recommend this upgrade? Maybe, if you're not an audiophile and just looking for a little more umph in the low end. This combination may work good for you. About $150 in materials, and should be possible to go back to the stock speaker / factory amp if you're unhappy.
I'll likely keep this setup until someone comes along with a 10" box that fits the factory location.
There are not really many options for a 6X9 Sub, but I decided to 1st experiment with a Rockville RVL69W 150W/300W "subwoofer". Not sure I really consider it a subwoofer, but figure for the price I'd give it a shot.
I was able to get the RVL69W to fit in the factory box with some finessing.
Inner tab needs to be cut, and box needs to be heated an press downwards:
Subwoofer fitment was also off in which the OEM box is slightly more narrow than the RVL69W speaker, so I also had to heat the oval edge to get the speaker to sit inside. I had to grind two of the speaker holes to align with the OEM box. and then used some urethane caulking to seal the speaker to the enclosure.
Routing power was pretty straight forward, used a grommet on the firewall to route the cable. Trick for me was to pull out the grommet itself, and cut the end off to allow me to feed the wire:
I used a soundstream PN1.650D mono 650W amp, factory sub wiring feeding the high input.
Sub is mounted in the storage area, and remote mounted by the driver side knee area.
Overall I am pleased with the results, low end bass is definitively better at least 2X from the factory but its not as crisp as a 10 sub. I suspect some of that has to do with the limitations of the factory box.
I should have done a 150-20Hz sweep before and after, but didn't think of that until after. I did play a 15 second clip from Big Tymers - Still Fly 2:45 to 3:00 as the base hit at 2:53 is one of the more memorable ones I could recall in a song.
Top is factory, bottom is RVL69W, you can see from about 110Hz picks up a few DB, an carries nicely in the low 10-40Hz range. This is same EQ settings base at 0, sub gain slightly higher so that the song sounds good to my personal ear (not maxed out) and volume at 15.
Increasing the sub volume, even without distortion cause all kinds of rattles within the car and just doesn't sound good. I just wanted something slightly better than stock. At least something comparable to my previous 2018 Model 3, and this setup meets and exceeds that goal. Bass hits much stronger than my model 3 ever did.
I regret not experiment with getting a smaller amp and trying to use the factory subwoofer, not sure what the results would have been but would have been interesting.
Guess the questions to close this out:
1. I am happy results? Yes, though I wished I would have experimented with the factory speaker 1st.
2. Would I recommend this upgrade? Maybe, if you're not an audiophile and just looking for a little more umph in the low end. This combination may work good for you. About $150 in materials, and should be possible to go back to the stock speaker / factory amp if you're unhappy.
I'll likely keep this setup until someone comes along with a 10" box that fits the factory location.
Sponsored