Sponsored

bd5400

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2021
Threads
14
Messages
885
Reaction score
1,721
Location
Milwaukee
Vehicles
R1T, SL500
Clubs
 
Ambosrivians on instagram just made a post showing the new surround view camera view when in reverse.

A very welcome improvement.
Rivian R1T R1S Latest OTA Updates Adds Surround View Camera Screenshot 2022-03-02 at 8.52.37 AM
Sponsored

 

Inkedsphynx

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
1,021
Reaction score
2,035
Location
Washington
Vehicles
'22 LE R1T, '21 CB500FA, '21 CMX1100A
Quality looks better too?
 

kurtlikevonnegut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Threads
27
Messages
2,715
Reaction score
7,525
Location
SC/TX
Vehicles
2023 R1S DM, Honda Odyssey
Clubs
 
Ambosrivians on instagram just made a post showing the new surround view camera view when in reverse.

A very welcome improvement.
Screenshot 2022-03-02 at 8.52.37 AM.png
Something that would have had people jumping for joy 2 days ago, now gets a big WOMP WOMP
 

Sponsored

Inkedsphynx

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
1,021
Reaction score
2,035
Location
Washington
Vehicles
'22 LE R1T, '21 CB500FA, '21 CMX1100A
I'd have paid an extra 1k for it, if it had to be a paid option :) Not joking. It's worth that price, imo.
 

CommodoreAmiga

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2020
Threads
39
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
7,729
Location
INACTIVE
Vehicles
INACTIVE
Jesus, why couldn't Rivian have just said "yes, we will add birds-eye view in an OTA update in 2022" when asked? Instead they refused to commit to anything and said they had no plans to add it.

Is this another example of absolute abysmal communication? Or are they so oblivious that now they're throwing shit at the walls realizing that "oh crap, people meant it when they said feature X mattered to them".
 

Canthoney

Well-Known Member
First Name
Andrew
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Threads
85
Messages
868
Reaction score
2,441
Location
Kansas City
Vehicles
2025 Rivian R1S Tri-Motor, 2022 Rivian R1T
Occupation
Project Management
That’s worth the extra $20,000 right there! /s
 

CommodoreAmiga

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2020
Threads
39
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
7,729
Location
INACTIVE
Vehicles
INACTIVE
Also, where are all the peeps who insisted the cameras were physically not in positions that could support this feature?
 

svet-am

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tony
Joined
Mar 24, 2021
Threads
16
Messages
666
Reaction score
1,245
Location
Broomfield, CO
Vehicles
R1S (Launch Edition Preorder)
Occupation
Embedded Systems Engineer

Sponsored

Mcdubjr

Well-Known Member
Site Sponsor
First Name
Jim
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
409
Reaction score
827
Location
Orange County, CA
Website
adventurehightech.com
Vehicles
Mazda CX-9
Occupation
Software Guy
Clubs
 
Also, where are all the peeps who insisted the cameras were physically not in positions that could support this feature?
I think they already left…
 

NY_Rob

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rob
Joined
Feb 9, 2022
Threads
23
Messages
5,391
Reaction score
7,960
Location
long island
Vehicles
Model 3 LR AWD, BMW i3 REX, 2024 Rubicon 4xe
Occupation
IT
Wow, that's about half as good as the surround-view cams on my $29K Chevy Bolt from 2017...

Bravo Rivian!! Way to go!!
 

jtshaw

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Nov 18, 2020
Threads
5
Messages
288
Reaction score
711
Location
Seattle, WA
Vehicles
Tesla Model 3, LE R1S
Occupation
Engineering VP
Jesus, why couldn't Rivian have just said "yes, we will add birds-eye view in an OTA update in 2022" when asked? Instead they refused to commit to anything and said they had no plans to add it.

Is this another example of absolute abysmal communication? Or are they so oblivious that now they're throwing shit at the walls realizing that "oh crap, people meant it when they said feature X mattered to them".
As a software leader, I suspect this is more around not wanting to over-promise and under-deliver in areas where they had solution ambiguity. It's actually not very common to be aggressive with discussing software roadmaps externally at tech companies because it massively reduces your flexibility in terms of problem spaces you attempt to solve and it is an easy way to over extend your engineering teams and embarrass your company publicly (see also, "FSD Is going to be feature complete by end of year! for like 7 consecutive years"). That said, with the OTHER comms problems Rivian clearly has I understand the pile-on frustration.
 

Guy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Guy
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Threads
12
Messages
1,607
Reaction score
1,518
Location
Philadelphia suburbs
Vehicles
Mazda 6, Toyota Sienna
Occupation
Scientist
Clubs
 
I'd have paid an extra 1k for it, if it had to be a paid option :) Not joking. It's worth that price, imo.
You just like bending over for this company not seems.
 

jffkm

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
130
Reaction score
216
Location
Berkeley, California
Vehicles
model 3
does it cost extra?
Legit question. In the S1, Rivian stated they anticipated an additional $10k (or it could have been $12k, i can't remember) in revenue, post-purchase from each driver. That suggests they are planning on potentially charging a ton for each "additional" software-enabled option after the free membership expires. I am worried about this, especially after the $25k increase in price. Their comms has to do better or they are going to get whiplash on the market until they can hit sustainable production volumes and revenue. I haven't gotten any clear answer on what is included in membership and honestly I don't think the CS agents have been told either.
Sponsored

 
 








Top