Sponsored

Long road trip? Drive faster.

Thebandit

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
235
Reaction score
365
Location
NY
Vehicles
Subaru Crosstrek, Ascent
Just for fun, I asked Claude to estimate how long it would take to do a 2000 mile road trip in the R2 at various speeds. I used a pretty reasonable efficiency curve (3.15 mpk at 65, 2.74 at 75, 2.39 at 85) and charging speed (30 minutes 10-80%) as assumptions.

Turns out that, taking charging into account, you're better off driving faster. Total travel time decreases steadily up to over 100 mph. Less efficiency at higher speed means more charging stops, but you make up for it in actual driving time.

So if you're doing a shortish trip and trying to just get there without having to charge, then go a bit slower. But if you really want to eat some miles, forget about the efficiency vs speed and just go as fast as you're comfortable.
Sponsored

 

Mos Eisley

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 24, 2026
Threads
36
Messages
766
Reaction score
1,356
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
Mazda CX-5, CX-30 & R2 on the way!
Occupation
Marketing & Sales Consultant, Freelance Photographer
Just for fun, I asked Claude to estimate how long it would take to do a 2000 mile road trip in the R2 at various speeds. I used a pretty reasonable efficiency curve (3.15 mpk at 65, 2.74 at 75, 2.39 at 85) and charging speed (30 minutes 10-80%) as assumptions.

Turns out that, taking charging into account, you're better off driving faster. Total travel time decreases steadily up to over 100 mph. Less efficiency at higher speed means more charging stops, but you make up for it in actual driving time.

So if you're doing a shortish trip and trying to just get there without having to charge, then go a bit slower. But if you really want to eat some miles, forget about the efficiency vs speed and just go as fast as you're comfortable.
Did you ask Claude to factor in odds for speeding tickets, delays due to being pulled over and the cost of tickets and or court fees? :p
 

B_Wagon136

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2024
Threads
15
Messages
69
Reaction score
84
Location
SoCal
Vehicles
PDM R1S, Black Diamond Bronco
Did you ask Claude to factor in odds for speeding tickets, delays due to being pulled over and the cost of tickets and or court fees? :p
Nor is it simply "30 minutes from 10-80%." Its time getting off the freeway. Finding the stall. Getting your adapter out. Initiating charge in app or p.o.s., time getting back on the freeway, etc.

I love studying stuff like this, so not trying to be a hater. But I'd venture to say every "30 min 10-80%" dream is closer to 45 min when its said and done.
 

tivoboy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Paul
Joined
Nov 8, 2025
Threads
3
Messages
412
Reaction score
513
Location
Palo Alto, CA
Vehicles
M3
Driving faster will almost certainly yield shorter trips and to optimize one should drive in the 10-70% SOC range, and do more stops vs. Longer stops.. assuming quality charging on the road the charging curve Is between between 5% and 50%.. and a stop like that might take 10-12 minutes, and then back on the burn.
 

asellus

New Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2026
Threads
0
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
some
No need to rope in an LLM to do this level of basic number crunching, use your meatbrain.

Even using butt-numbers on the back of a napkin the math maths. The same's true for ICE vehicles. :)
 

Sponsored

UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan

Well-Known Member
First Name
Barnum
Joined
Mar 20, 2023
Threads
71
Messages
9,138
Reaction score
12,660
Location
SoCal
Vehicles
'23 GW Quad-Large R1T "Ghost"
Occupation
Advertising Circus
Same has been discussed and concluded before, before a single R2 existed. Better long distance strategy is to have shorter faster stints between stops, which also keep charging sessions shorter, and is also potentially better for battery chemistry (less SOC delta between starting and finishing %).
 

VSG

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
3,402
Reaction score
6,469
Location
WA
Vehicles
R1T LE/RB/OC/20
We'll if I had to travel 2000 miles, and if I prioritized speed over everything else, I would fly. And beat you there. And have a couple of days of free time more than you when I get there.

Point is, the equation changes drastically when your goal is something other than to get there as soon as possible.
 

tivoboy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Paul
Joined
Nov 8, 2025
Threads
3
Messages
412
Reaction score
513
Location
Palo Alto, CA
Vehicles
M3
We'll if I had to travel 2000 miles, and if I prioritized speed over everything else, I would fly. And beat you there. And have a couple of days of free time more than you when I get there.

Point is, the equation changes drastically when your goal is something other than to get there as soon as possible.
I did 2680 in 36 hours once. So you’d only have a day and a half on me.

(Or my me 31 years ago. ;-)
Sponsored

 
 








Top