Sponsored

The GOAT of Rivian R2 reviews IS COMING!

cusetownusa

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
79
Reaction score
62
Location
Syracuse
Vehicles
Rivian R1S and Telsa Model Y
Sleeping giant in the room is the seemingly crazy newer Model 3/Y battery degradation issues. Kyle said he has content on this coming soon. Here’s my 2024 M3P with 13,000 miles on a road trip a month ago. Best efficiency and furthest I ever got. Doing the math with 62.6 kWh and 89% of the battery used you get an implied roughly 70kWh available pack capacity. My battery test shows I’m at 92-93% full health already. That means full pack was about 75-77kWh new, which makes sense. So even with this really good road trip run at 4.25 mi per kWh efficiency, due to the battery degradation my 0-100% range is under 300 miles. Mind you this wasn’t a straight 266 miles at 80mph either. This was at best averaging 70mph. So in reality R2 could end up being very similar to Model 3/Y in effective range just one year after you purchased it due to these crazy early degradation issues. Not even talking about how much better R2 charging performance is.

Just some interesting thoughts!

IMG_2874.webp
I was thinking the same. My 2022 Model Y with 45,000 miles has about an 87.5% battery capacity.
 

DuoRivians

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2022
Threads
263
Messages
3,993
Reaction score
9,429
Location
California
Vehicles
R1T, R1S
Almost 60 mile delta at 70mph, yikes.

MY P went over EPA at 70mph. Yes I know EPA is not constant 70mph, but to come up almost 80miles short of EPA in R2 is terrible.

Tesla is not longer advertising false ranges like it use to, Rivian is.
People give Kyle shit, but at least he’s providing actual data for us. Now we know the R2 isn’t a great road tripping car.
 

Sponsored

Jeremy3292

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
Apr 27, 2026
Threads
8
Messages
1,215
Reaction score
2,215
Location
South Carolina
Vehicles
R2
Oh damn I just realized this test was done when it was 98 degrees outside and they set the temperature to 68 degrees auto (22:32 mark)! Ok I feel better about this now actually. They used a ton of power on HVAC in this test.

This aligns better with Tom's test knowing this. Tom was on 20" AT wheels and got 3 MPK, so 3.1 MPK on 21" AS, which jives with what OOS showed on their ~25 mile tests in earlier videos at 70mph.

89 x 3 = 267 miles
89 x 3.1 = 276 miles

A big difference in real world IMO.
 

macb00kemdanno

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brandon
Joined
Feb 19, 2024
Threads
15
Messages
596
Reaction score
1,703
Location
Garner, NC
Vehicles
R2 LE Reservation, 2024 Tesla Model 3, 2023 Tesla Model Y
State of Charge got 259, so it also shows the discrepancies with these YouTubers testing procedures.
To be fair, his test was performed without any comparative data. At least with OoS, they had the Model Y Performance there at the same time for comparison testing. So, I think it's a more valid test, IMHO.

And It's cool seeing that OoS is doing testing right in my neck of the woods, they mentioned turning around in Zebulon on 64, which is right down the road :D

Oh damn I just realized this test was done when it was 98 degrees outside and they set the temperature to 68 degrees auto (22:32 mark)! Ok I feel better about this now actually. They used a ton of power on HVAC in this test.

This aligns better with Tom's test knowing this. Tom was on 20" AT wheels and got 3 MPK, so 3.1 MPK on 21" AS, which jives with what OOS showed on their ~25 mile tests in earlier videos at 70mph.
Which gets to my comment above. They still had BOTH cars side-by-side for testing. So real-world data from both under the exact same conditions. It's still disappointing.
 

Jeremy3292

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
Apr 27, 2026
Threads
8
Messages
1,215
Reaction score
2,215
Location
South Carolina
Vehicles
R2
To be fair, his test was performed without any comparative data. At least with OoS, they had the Model Y Performance there at the same time for comparison testing. So, I think it's a more valid test, IMHO.

And It's cool seeing that OoS is doing testing right in my neck of the woods, they mentioned turning around in Zebulon on 64, which is right down the road :D



Which gets to my comment above. They still had BOTH cars side-by-side for testing. So real-world data from both under the exact same conditions. It's still disappointing.
Yesh but I personally don't care at all about Model Y. I care about how far R2 goes. So this information does matter for R2 range, and trying to link this test up with Tom's on 20" AT.
 

rogunenode

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
94
Reaction score
189
Location
Nederland, CO
Vehicles
R1T Quad / Lotus Emira
I expected better at 70mph. For not much more money, if you don't need the ground clearance, YT range tests of the IX3 seem to put it at ~300mi @ 80mph and ~340mi @ 70mph.
 

Sponsored

savethemanual

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2024
Threads
19
Messages
1,132
Reaction score
2,032
Location
Earth
Vehicles
Future R2
To be fair, his test was performed without any comparative data. At least with OoS, they had the Model Y Performance there at the same time for comparison testing. So, I think it's a more valid test, IMHO.

And It's cool seeing that OoS is doing testing right in my neck of the woods, they mentioned turning around in Zebulon on 64, which is right down the road :D



Which gets to my comment above. They still had BOTH cars side-by-side for testing. So real-world data from both under the exact same conditions. It's still disappointing.
All you're saying with the Tesla there is that it's more efficient. The Rivian would of come closer to it's EPA range without the A/C working so hard and the Tesla would of done even better too if the ambient temps were not so extreme.
 

macb00kemdanno

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brandon
Joined
Feb 19, 2024
Threads
15
Messages
596
Reaction score
1,703
Location
Garner, NC
Vehicles
R2 LE Reservation, 2024 Tesla Model 3, 2023 Tesla Model Y
Yesh but I personally don't care at all about Model Y. I care about how far R2 goes. So this information does matter for R2 range, and trying to link this test up with Tom's on 20" AT.
Point taken. As someone coming from a Model Y, and as someone who heard RJ say that it would match MY efficiency, it's disappointing. That's just my take.

Won't change my decision to buy, but I'll be keeping an eye on other claims made by RJ (i.e., point-to-point autonomous driving by year's end).
 

macb00kemdanno

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brandon
Joined
Feb 19, 2024
Threads
15
Messages
596
Reaction score
1,703
Location
Garner, NC
Vehicles
R2 LE Reservation, 2024 Tesla Model 3, 2023 Tesla Model Y
All you're saying with the Tesla there is that it's more efficient. The Rivian would of come closer to it's EPA range without the A/C working so hard and the Tesla would of done even better too if the ambient temps were not so extreme.
But those ambient temps are not extreme here in NC... it's a typical summer day :D
 

Jeremy3292

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeremy
Joined
Apr 27, 2026
Threads
8
Messages
1,215
Reaction score
2,215
Location
South Carolina
Vehicles
R2
Point taken. As someone coming from a Model Y, and as someone who heard RJ say that it would match MY efficiency, it's disappointing. That's just my take.

Won't change my decision to buy, but I'll be keeping an eye on other claims made by RJ (i.e., point-to-point autonomous driving by year's end).
Agreed, but it makes me feel a little better personally as keeping AC at 68 degrees auto when its 98 degrees outside is insane. So the OOO 70mph range test jives better with Tom's test knowing these variables and the wheel differences. 250 vs 275 miles is a huge difference in real world life.
Sponsored

 
 








Top