Sponsored

No tax credit for customers with binding contracts.

Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
OP

Ngkgb

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2022
Threads
82
Messages
830
Reaction score
770
Location
United States
Vehicles
Rivian R1T
Am I crazy or does this not say that if you have a binding contract but take delivery in 2023, then the new rules apply?
Sponsored

 

Matt D.

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
May 20, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
316
Reaction score
768
Location
Pennsylvania
Vehicles
Odyssey
There doesn’t seem to be a provision in the guidance for when you made the purchase prior to 8/16/2022 but didn’t take delivery until sometime in 2023.
 

Dark-Fx

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Threads
148
Messages
13,610
Reaction score
27,506
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
R1T, R1S, Livewire One, Sierra EV, R1S
Occupation
Engineering
Clubs
 
Am I crazy or does this not say that if you have a binding contract but take delivery in 2023, then the new rules apply?
The language in the paragraphs is different. The second paragraph makes no mention of a binding contract.

This guidance is just for people who are looking to claim their vehicle credit on their 2022 taxes. The second paragraph is saying that you don't qualify under the 2022 tax year because you did not take delivery of the vehicle during the tax year.
 

JerseyGreens

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Threads
3
Messages
681
Reaction score
838
Location
NJ
Vehicles
2023 R1S ADV
Occupation
CAT Property Underwriter
As others have mentioned there is nothing new here.

We will get new guidance on 2023 tax filing implications at some point in late 2022. Until then rest easy my friends and hope for best.
 

Sponsored

Autolycus

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
2,234
Reaction score
3,430
Location
ATL
Vehicles
ICE only :(
Round and round we go again, with the same exact language discussed in multiple other threads, some of which have a title that's pretty easy to find.

We won't know until we get more guidance for 2023 taxes, and that probably won't happen until the IRS issues the guidance on battery material sourcing.

If you entered a written binding contract to buy a vehicle before August 16, 2022, but took possession on or after August 16, 2022, and before January 1, 2023, you may claim the credit based on the prior rules and disregard the assembly requirement.

If you purchased a vehicle between August 16, 2022 and December 31, 2022 but don't take delivery of the vehicle until 2023, see Credit for New Clean Vehicles Purchased in 2023 and After.
There's a third scenario not described here: "purchased" a vehicle before August 16, 2022 but don't take delivery until 2023 (or later). Will that scenario end up being taxed differently than the 2nd scenario described? Nobody knows. IRS probably hasn't made a final decision.
 

mkennedy1996

Well-Known Member
First Name
Max
Joined
Nov 18, 2020
Threads
41
Messages
437
Reaction score
744
Location
North Georgia
Vehicles
R1S, Model X, Model Y

mkennedy1996

Well-Known Member
First Name
Max
Joined
Nov 18, 2020
Threads
41
Messages
437
Reaction score
744
Location
North Georgia
Vehicles
R1S, Model X, Model Y

tomis916

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Dec 26, 2019
Threads
2
Messages
86
Reaction score
151
Location
Boulder, Colorado
Vehicles
2023 Rivian R1S
Am I crazy or does this not say that if you have a binding contract but take delivery in 2023, then the new rules apply?
You're not crazy. You are just trying to read IRS guidance as if it were common English. There is still a route to getting a credit under the old rules with a BPA for 2023 deliveries, but I wouldn't take it to the bank.
 

Sponsored

Dark-Fx

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Threads
148
Messages
13,610
Reaction score
27,506
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
R1T, R1S, Livewire One, Sierra EV, R1S
Occupation
Engineering
Clubs
 

cohall

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Threads
76
Messages
1,606
Reaction score
5,677
Location
Denver
Vehicles
2022 R1T, 2023 R1S
I need to revisit my reading comprehension classes.
If it makes you feel any better...I read it the same way. But I haven't been following much of this closely since I took delivery last year.
 

COdogman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jan 21, 2022
Threads
33
Messages
11,641
Reaction score
34,494
Location
CO
Vehicles
2023 R1T
Occupation
Cyber defender
Clubs
 

zipzag

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
1,088
Reaction score
983
Location
Chicago
Vehicles
Model Y
So, as an alternate strategy, the R1T can be configured dual motor max pack for under 80K

Is it really worth the chance of losing the old credit? Or are the income levels different?

There's a third scenario not described here: "purchased" a vehicle before August 16, 2022 but don't take delivery until 2023 (or later). Will that scenario end up being taxed differently than the 2nd scenario described? Nobody knows. IRS probably hasn't made a final decision.
I assume most of us here signed the purchase agreement before 8/16. The IRS warning seems to be what they consider a binding agreement under state law.
 
Last edited:

Dark-Fx

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Threads
148
Messages
13,610
Reaction score
27,506
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
R1T, R1S, Livewire One, Sierra EV, R1S
Occupation
Engineering
Clubs
 
Agreed. It’s definitely possible the statement OP is referring to is also their answer for “binding contracts”.
There's three scenarios here even if you read the second as having a binding contract.

Scenario 1:
If you entered a written binding contract to buy a vehicle before August 16, 2022, but took possession on or after August 16, 2022, and before January 1, 2023
Scenario 2:
If you purchased a vehicle between August 16, 2022 and December 31, 2022 but don't take delivery until 2023
Scenario 3:
If I have a binding contract to buy a vehicle before August 16, 2022, and did not purchase between August 16, 2022 and December 31, 2022, then there is no guidance for me on this page.

Since Rivian doesn't actually let you purchase a vehicle without taking delivery, I don't think there is a single person that should be worried about scenario 2.
Sponsored

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
 








Top