RivianRunner
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Marcus
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2021
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 262
- Reaction score
- 263
- Location
- Bellingham, WA
- Vehicles
- F-150, Suzuki DR650
- Occupation
- Tester
That's not true, Tesla has had positive automotive gross margins, even on the Roadster hand built in the early days on a modified Lotus Elise chassis. Over 4 years they built less than 2500 of them. It was a proof of concept vehicle, hand made in low numbers, which is why I didn't count it. By the time Rivian built their first EV, the modern lithium-ion EV had already been commercialized by Tesla and others. Even the hand-built Roadster was built with positive gross margins, that's how tight of a ship Elon ran. He knows how to run a business.The Roadster was being sold in 2008. That's a fact that can't be ignored. So five years after the company was founded, they sold their first car. Rivian, on the other hand, it's more than twice that amount of time.
As far as positive gross margins, what did you expect? That only comes with scale. No start-up car manufacturer will be able to scale from the beginning. Rivian just needs to stay afloat long enough to reach that point.
This is exactly the point I see misrepresented again and again here. Specifically is that Tesla did not build cars profitably from the early days. On a gross margin basis, they did. The only reason so many are misguided on this point is because TSLAQ types constantly parroted that they lost money on every car they built. That was never true, with perhaps a couple of quarterly exceptions. Every year they had positive automotive gross margins, the more cars they built, the less money the company lost.
Like many here, you are confusing net margins with gross margins.
I do agree with your first point, Tesla moves about twice as fast as Rivian.
Sponsored