kizamybute'
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2021
- Threads
- 80
- Messages
- 1,180
- Reaction score
- 1,997
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Vehicles
- This one, that one and the other one.
- Thread starter
- #31
I agree. Rivian's estimated range is of course still learning my driving style. But yes, it is much better than the Tesla. When I left the the charger, it said I had 205 miles in range. 95 mile trip meant I should have 110 left when I got home. Was actually at 86. But, I'm sure it didn't plan on the massive headwind, nor my doing 75-80 MPH. It will learn and adjust over time.This is one of things I actually really appreciate about the Rivian compared to my Model 3. Sure...the EA experience is not great compared to Superchargers. But the range estimate is so much more forgiving and accurate in my experience.
Had a similar experience going to Lake Tahoe from SF Bay Area. Both ABRP and the on-screen range estimator told me i would need to charge to make it there (and it was my first time, so i did stop to charge a bit) but i would have reached with 15% remaining had I not. Tesla's range estimate is so ridiculously off, i always expect to get 10-15% less than what it says. It's refreshing to drive an EV where you actually get the range it says you will get.
Yes, Tesla's range indicator is completely useless. They give you only the potential range of the vehicle. Doesn't adjust to the driver or based on the trip. The range estimate however, in navigation is far more accurate on the Tesla if you have your destination entered. That one is usually pretty accurate. All other EV's besides Tesla are using the adaptive range estimates which is much appreciated. I don't care what the car can do if I drive it under perfect conditions and like grandma, I want to know what it WILL do. The Rivian, Ford and just about all others give you more realistic range estimates.
Sponsored