Supratachophobia
Well-Known Member
For the highway tests, yes. But for the EPA rating which is city/highway combined, presumably they have a more efficient rear inverter coupled with the allowed EPA fudge factor.Here is what I don’t understand about this test. Why is it that the large pack falls short of its EPA estimate by 10% but it’s something like 18% for the max? They are the same dual motor vehicle driven an almost identical loop. Are the EPA parametrs (correction factors) different for the max? Or is the last part of the test wherein the max pack vehicle drives without the large pack the culprit?
That would not explain why the dual motor max pack needs higher average efficiency than the dual motor large pack given @OutofSpecKyle capacity results for the respective packs (EPA range divided by OutOfSpecs capacity estimate). There is no way that can be the case and it was demonstrated in the test that the efficiencies are essentially identical.
what am I missing?
What you are missing is Rivian doing whatever they can to call what they gave us a "max" pack. So I would reluctantly agree they met the letter but fell way short on the spirit. Especially when you consider the cost. It's a dick move whatever way you slice it.
Edit: Oh, but yeah, I'm still totally buying it.
Sponsored