Search results

I am not going to subscribe. I don't need: - hotspot. I already have an unlimited data connection. download speed difference between car (LTE) and my phone (5G) in most cases is also pretty significant. - connected voice assistant. never used. - satellite maps. never need satellite maps when in...

GFC told me a few weeks ago that they have not started on the topper at all and have no timeline.

Gary is supposedly coming back from vacation in the next update: Fixed a rare issue that prevented video files from Motion Cam, Alarms, Gear Guard, and Incident Cam from displaying. I don't really trust Rivian's definition of "rare" considering it seems like its affecting every Gen 1

Cool. For context, I'm at 20K miles and pretty hard on the battery: lots of DCFC and high state of charge cycles.

My batteryCapacity value seen through electrafi is: 130.145004 Is the consensus that the original denominator is 131 or 135?

They did, but the invoice doesn't say anything about what went wrong. Just says they swapped the 12V.

Update: Rivian was able to get me the truck back the next afternoon thankfully. It did take me pestering the service center to get them to prioritize fixing the issue, however. Still haven't gotten a good description of what went wrong after repeated asks.

I would gladly wait a few extra weeks to see a meaningful improvement in efficiency.

Asked GFC for an update yesterday as I was originally expecting to get this installed in August: No we are not on schedule to do any installs next month. I also cannot give you a clear time line update. We are not ready and we do not have a final price for the Camper/Toppers.

Two weeks ago, my truck started showing the "Replace 12V Battery" warning. I checked the voltage in the RiDE menu and everything looked normal (13-14V). The car was fully operational with the exception that it would not install the latest software update because of the the 12V error. The soonest...

I've been playing in the app looking at the grades. They generally don't seem that meaningful. I can't seem to find anything lower than a "B" including chargers I have repeatedly witnessed failures at. What does seem meaningful is the "average top speed" as an indicator of success. For example...

Put down my deposit!

Thank you for posting this. I've been meaning to solve this problem for a while. This is such a design miss on Rivian's part.

Noticed this off until late afternoon in Truckee as well yesterday

To add to the prioritization debate: I think they should prioritize folks based on the number of DCFC kWhs added over your vehicle lifetime. Those are the folks who would benefit the most and those who have felt the most public charger pain!

FWIW the numbers were: 510 in normal, 488 in rock crawl. For those who haven't seen the Cybertruck video, the Rivian wins out: My R1T also replaced a built out 4Runner (3rd Gen) with a 3" lift. I just put on the Megawatt sliders a few weeks back and they are great. Ready for more technical...

I think most people would incorrectly assume highest = most articulation. The Rivian UI does a bad job at guiding people into the correct off-road setting in this respect. That said, the difference is ultimately not that big of a deal per this testing:

I'd love to see a photo of the 20" rack mounted as well as a photo of your bed camera view (which sounds clear?). I want to put an order in for a XO rack but am on the fence between 20" and 23" (crossbar height).

R3X the rally vehicle we always dreamed of

was not expecting this!!!