mkg3
Well-Known Member
Not sure what you are disagreeing about. I'm not saying that building codes don't make any differences - they clearly do.Actually building a home to be fire resistant would have gone a long way toward saving buildings. The problem with Pacific Palisades and Altadena is the age of the neighborhoods. This has nothing to do with perceived biases regarding who's to blame, and everything to do with homes that were never designed for a drought stricken environment that regularly experiences high winds and fire.
I'm not overly familiar with California's current building codes,...
So I beg to differ, building codes can make a difference.
What I did say was that no amount of codes or policies would have prevented high winds and existing old homes. You are correct in pointing out and agreeing with me about the general age of homes in the affected area being a part of the problem.
When people rebuild, they'll have to conform to the new codes. That said, unless there are new technology to prevent embers from entering the eaves and vents to start a fire from inside, even with flame retardant material, some cannot be avoided. Certainly will be reduced.
So, just about everything you wrote in response to my post, I agree with. Just don't understand why you singled out building code. In big scheme of things, building code is just a component. There are plenty of others that affect future avoidance of this type of disaster.
Sponsored