rraj2k81
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2021
- Threads
- 68
- Messages
- 762
- Reaction score
- 1,127
- Location
- Burlington, Ontario.
- Vehicles
- 2022 Tesla Model S LR
- Thread starter
- #1
The RAN DCFC Stations are in full production,
Sponsored
Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
Sites are the issue, not hardware. This is probably why we see them in EV friendly CA & CO, easier to stand up a site.I see enough ready-to-ship pedestals for at least 2, maybe 3 locations just in that one photo . . .
If we assume they've pushed their "3,500+ chargers through 2023" back a full year -- now plan to finish by 2024 -- then they'll need to produce an average of ~30 or so per week with no breaks. (really that's not quite right because there's lag between rolling off the line and turning it on onsite, so more like 40/week through September-October-ish 2024?
Even in EV friendly CA it takes a long time. Last year Tesla added a 12 station Supercharger around the corner from my house it took over 6 months from when they broke ground to when the station was powered up.Sites are the issue, not hardware. This is probably why we see them in EV friendly CA & CO, easier to stand up a site.
Permitting and grid upgrades are the long pole in the tent.
Of course the biggest factor will be their ability to get permits and the necessary electrical service, but when we're constantly reminded about supply chain problems affecting things like electrical components, chips, etc., all of which are pretty important to building these chargers, it's hard to not wonder if they'll actually be able to build that many charging units.Sites are the issue, not hardware. This is probably why we see them in EV friendly CA & CO, easier to stand up a site.
Permitting and grid upgrades are the long pole in the tent.
Technically they are supposed to be a Max of 350KW, as far as I know (With 800V foresight).I might have missed it, but what are the charging speeds for these?
350kW isn't a hard limit for CCS. If everything involved can handle 500A at 440V, it could be designed to handle it at 880V too.Technically they are supposed to be a Max of 350KW, as far as I know (With 800V foresight).
At the very least they are supposed to handle 500A with 400V without breaking a sweat.
I hit a max of 215KW when i used them and they had a very good charging curve.I might have missed it, but what are the charging speeds for these?
Yeah true. If it can do 500A it should theoretically hit the 400KW range with 800V.350kW isn't a hard limit for CCS. If everything involved can handle 500A at 440V, it could be designed to handle it at 880V too.
I can one up you on this one. One of the SC stations near me in CA took almost 2 years after the stalls were up, to actually be operational. It took so long, that they are still V2, while all the other new ones around here are V3 lol.Even in EV friendly CA it takes a long time. Last year Tesla added a 12 station Supercharger around the corner from my house it took over 6 months from when they broke ground to when the station was powered up.
Red Tape.....I can one up you on this one. One of the SC stations near me in CA took almost 2 years after the stalls were up, to actually be operational. It took so long, that they are still V2, while all the other new ones around here are V3 lol.
Yup, exactly. Ridiculous TBHRed Tape.....