Thanks for reviewing. Good point. I have now added the sales tax.Thank You PN. Valuable Tool. Well crafted. Wondering in the lease "early buyout" section should there also be a calculation for additional sales tax when purchased? Or has it been omitted because it is also not included if you go to end of lease terms and buyout/purchase at end of lease? Thank you...jim
You're not thinking about the time value of money. I completely agree with your sentiment of having the money to fund your purchases fully, but I do not agree with using that money to buy the vehicle. Let's say your car cost 100K and you plan on keeping it 10 years. You give Rivian your 100K and get your R1 free and clear. I finance the whole thing for 60 months paying 5% interest. I then take the 100K I saved for my truck and put it in a mutual fund averaging 10% over 10 years; a few have paid better than that over the same period.Perhaps. Worth pointing out that money for my rides I set aside. Making more money off it just might not be necessary at all. That is the job of other monies set aside for just that, make more money. It is all baked into the life cake and accounted for. Nothing is affected by paying cash.
I myself would be hard pressed to LOL while servicing debt even if at 0.00001% APR. Everybody's situation is different.
good example. Perhaps not as clear - the $146K extra, that would raise your overall tax bracket when you liquidate the Mutual Funds, and so tax on $146K + additional tax due to tax bracket increase needs to be accounted for, for a true apple to apple. May be 25% (assuming long-term 20% + additional 5% due to tax bracket increase)?You're not thinking about the time value of money. I completely agree with your sentiment of having the money to fund your purchases fully, but I do not agree with using that money to buy the vehicle. Let's say your car cost 100K and you plan on keeping it 10 years. You give Rivian your 100K and get your R1 free and clear. I finance the whole thing for 60 months paying 5% interest. I then take the 100K I saved for my truck and put it in a mutual fund averaging 10% over 10 years; a few have paid better than that over the same period.
After those 10 years, assuming we both kept our R1s this entire time, I will have paid an extra 13,227.00 dollars for my R1 than you would have. However, the 100K I put in that mutual fund 10 years prior is now worth 259,374. So I would have an extra 146,147, over double my initial investment, in my pocket. If you have enough money that an extra 146K dollars doesn't mean anything to your financial picture then you're right paying cash doesn't matter.
Hedge against an 800V solid state version with 500 miles and equal weight hitting the market in 2027 to 2028. That's why I lease.I chose Lease for the following reasons:
I primarily use it for a new business so I write off a good portion of lease payments and related expenses.
Hedge against uncertain future value and vehicle accidents.
I’d like to see repairs and replacement costs go down over the next 2-3 years. Assuming Rivian continues to grow and rates decline, I’ll finance my next R1S.
Living 100% debt-free is an incredibly satisfying, liberating, priceless feeling, one of life's greatest pleasures and accomplishments in my view.You're not thinking about the time value of money. I completely agree with your sentiment of having the money to fund your purchases fully, but I do not agree with using that money to buy the vehicle. Let's say your car cost 100K and you plan on keeping it 10 years. You give Rivian your 100K and get your R1 free and clear. I finance the whole thing for 60 months paying 5% interest. I then take the 100K I saved for my truck and put it in a mutual fund averaging 10% over 10 years; a few have paid better than that over the same period.
After those 10 years, assuming we both kept our R1s this entire time, I will have paid an extra 13,227.00 dollars for my R1 than you would have. However, the 100K I put in that mutual fund 10 years prior is now worth 259,374. So I would have an extra 146,147, over double my initial investment, in my pocket. If you have enough money that an extra 146K dollars doesn't mean anything to your financial picture then you're right paying cash doesn't matter.
Fair enough, I see things in a similar manner except I view it as so long as my investments and income exceed my debts I’m debt free as I could liquidate and pay them off whenever.Living 100% debt-free is an incredibly satisfying, liberating, priceless feeling, one of life's greatest pleasures and accomplishments in my view.
Not having banks, loansharks, cc companies ordering you, telling you what to do, their grimy, filthy paws in my wallet, my cars, my house, etc. No way in hell. They all can just bugger off.
The monies set aside for my expenses have no purview in making more money for me. 100% N/A. That is the job and mission of other monies set aside for just that. Give me total debt-free liberty or give me death, the way I see it.
Depends on your current tax bracket but usually the idea is to leave that money alone until retirement when it’s your only income so you only draw enough off to keep you under whatever bracket you can live off the intersection of the amount saved and your lifestyle.good example. Perhaps not as clear - the $146K extra, that would raise your overall tax bracket when you liquidate the Mutual Funds, and so tax on $146K + additional tax due to tax bracket increase needs to be accounted for, for a true apple to apple. May be 25% (assuming long-term 20% + additional 5% due to tax bracket increase)?