Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
Length (in) | Width (in) | Height (in) | |
R1S | 200.8 | 81.8 (mirrors folded) | 77.3 |
4Runner | 191 | 76 (without mirrors) | 72 |
Sequoia | 205 | 80 (without mirrors) | 77 |
Model X | 198 | 79 (without mirrors) | 66 |
Lexus GX | 192 | 74 (without mirrors) | 74 |
Not sure what this thread is trying to do. List similar sized vehicles based on external dimensions? Internal volume? Or asking the community for input?
If you are trying to provide a list of comparably sized ICE vehicles, perhaps compiling a table with LxWxH numbers like this would be helpful.
Length (in) Width (in) Height (in) R1S 200.8 81.8 (mirrors folded) 77.3 4Runner 191 76 (without mirrors) 72 Sequoia 205 80 (without mirrors) 77 Model X 198 79 (without mirrors) 66 Lexus GX 192 74 (without mirrors) 74
Also, would take these as a gain of salt as body shape makes a big difference. The Boxy shape of the Sequoia and R1S give them more interior volume than the Model X for example
I would like to find out about interior dimensions as well for comparison..if 3 rd row seats are comfortable for avg size audlts, I will be pretty happy about overall size..Not sure what this thread is trying to do. List similar sized vehicles based on external dimensions? Internal volume? Or asking the community for input?
If you are trying to provide a list of comparably sized ICE vehicles, perhaps compiling a table with LxWxH numbers like this would be helpful.
Length (in) Width (in) Height (in) R1S 200.8 81.8 (mirrors folded) 77.3 4Runner 191 76 (without mirrors) 72 Sequoia 205 80 (without mirrors) 77 Model X 198 79 (without mirrors) 66 Lexus GX 192 74 (without mirrors) 74
Also, would take these as a gain of salt as body shape makes a big difference. The Boxy shape of the Sequoia and R1S give them more interior volume than the Model X for example
Those seemed to get a lot of hate, and I'm not sure why. I always thought they were great, and anyone who's ever owned one seems to have nothing but praise for it.I can tell you it's exactly as long as my 2014 Ford Flex, which makes it fantastic for imagining the R1S in my garage! The R1S is 6" wider and up to ~9" taller (depending on ride height on the R1S—I don't know what the parked/kneel height is).
I would like to find out about interior dimensions as well for comparison..if 3 rd row seats are comfortable for avg size audlts, I will be pretty happy about overall size..
Also Volvo XC90 would be comparable.Not sure what this thread is trying to do. List similar sized vehicles based on external dimensions? Internal volume? Or asking the community for input?
If you are trying to provide a list of comparably sized ICE vehicles, perhaps compiling a table with LxWxH numbers like this would be helpful.
Length (in) Width (in) Height (in) R1S 200.8 81.8 (mirrors folded) 77.3 4Runner 191 76 (without mirrors) 72 Sequoia 205 80 (without mirrors) 77 Model X 198 79 (without mirrors) 66 Lexus GX 192 74 (without mirrors) 74
Also, would take these as a gain of salt as body shape makes a big difference. The Boxy shape of the Sequoia and R1S give them more interior volume than the Model X for example
I think they're just one of those polarizing, love-it-or-hate-it kind of cars. I love it. The only problems I've had are all electronic—infotainment/Bluetooth, electric liftgate, backup camera—which makes me somewhat wary of an electric car from Ford like the Mach E. I mean, surely they put more effort into it... I would just have a bit of a hard time trusting that.Those seemed to get a lot of hate, and I'm not sure why. I always thought they were great, and anyone who's ever owned one seems to have nothing but praise for it.
So this is great news for me.
R1S (202" L) | Tahoe (204" L) | Mercedes GLS (pre 2020-202" L) | BMW X7 (203.3" L) | Tesla MX | |
Effective Leg Room - Driver | 41.4 | 45.3 | 40.3 | 39.8 | 41.2 |
Effective Leg Room - Second | 36.7 | 39.0 | 38.5 | 37.6 | 38.4 |
Effective Leg Room - Third | 32.8 | 24.8 | 35 | 33.3 | NA |
Shoulder Room - Driver | 60.6 | 64.8 | 58.5 | 60 | 60.7 |
Shoulder Room - Second | 58.9 | 65.1 | 58.3 | 58.1 | 56.8 |
Shoulder Room - Third | 51.1 | 62.6 | 50.5 | 47.9 | NA |
Hip Room - Driver | 54.9 | 60.8 | NA | NA | 55.6 |
Hip Room - Second | 54.2 | 60.3 | NA | NA | 59 |
Hip Room - Third | 42.8 | 49.3 | NA | NA | NA |
Head Room - Driver | 41.1 | 42.8 | 41.2 | 41.9 | 41.7 |
Head Room - Second | 39.7 | 38.7 | 40 | 39.9 | 40.9 |
Head Room - Third | 38.6 | 38.1 | 38.9 | 36.6 | NA |
Thank youHere is my post from August but the numbers should still stand at this point. Going to have to sit in it.
For those who might be used to viewing these dimensions in inches, here is a comparison with the pre 2021 Tahoe (204") on a few dimensions (Edited with a few more to compare):
R1S (202" L) Tahoe (204" L) Mercedes GLS (pre 2020-202" L) BMW X7 (203.3" L) Tesla MX Effective Leg Room - Driver 41.4 45.3 40.3 39.8 41.2 Effective Leg Room - Second 36.7 39.0 38.5 37.6 38.4 Effective Leg Room - Third 32.8 24.8 35 33.3 NA Shoulder Room - Driver 60.6 64.8 58.5 60 60.7 Shoulder Room - Second 58.9 65.1 58.3 58.1 56.8 Shoulder Room - Third 51.1 62.6 50.5 47.9 NA Hip Room - Driver 54.9 60.8 NA NA 55.6 Hip Room - Second 54.2 60.3 NA NA 59 Hip Room - Third 42.8 49.3 NA NA NA Head Room - Driver 41.1 42.8 41.2 41.9 41.7 Head Room - Second 39.7 38.7 40 39.9 40.9 Head Room - Third 38.6 38.1 38.9 36.6 NA
As with everything else, I think it will be important to to reserve judgement until you actually get to sit in it.