webfootdawg
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Paul
- Joined
- May 31, 2022
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 238
- Reaction score
- 304
- Location
- Portland, OR
- Vehicles
- Q5, A4
- Thread starter
- #1
The government has actual standards for this program too, so I'm very curious if we'll see these changed.When you have the keys to the house, or in this case the passwords to the systems.....
"After reports circulated Wednesday night of the State Department's intent to purchase Tesla vehicles, the document was edited, at 9:12 p.m., and now says the federal contract is for $400 million worth of "armored electric vehicles," but the word "Tesla" was removed."
Thanks for posting that. Based on the disposal requirements, IMO EVs should not be eligible at this time. There's little doubt that disposing of an EV as required by this document will be more costly than disposing of an ICE. It's "easy" to crush, burn or explode an ICE at any military base - drive a tank over it, use it for target practice, or take it to any scrap yard that can torch it or crush it under witness. Can't do that with an EV until the battery is removed, requiring new procedures and probably transportation.The government has actual standards for this program too, so I'm very curious if we'll see these changed.
https://fam.state.gov/fam/12fam/12fam0380.html
And, best of all.. no need to sabotage them- they self destruct all by themselves as SOP.Hopefully they give them to one of our enemies as a trojan horse…
There was another article I read (can't find it now) that said the line item was shown as last edited on Dec 14. That's well within the time that Musk was nosing around in Washington. All possibilties considered (including that perhaps it did not originally say Tesla and a disgruntled staffer added "Tesla" out of spite?), it's impossible to know the true story, and we will never know the true story.Electrek has this story too. What's noteworthy is that this article shows the funding line where all these armored vehicles are to be purchased.
It was approved in December by the Biden administration and the current has nothing to do with these. This is the kind of transparency we can now expect.
https://electrek.co/2025/02/12/us-s...et-line-for-armored-teslas-worth-400-million/
Yes, it's been expected since 1988.It was approved in December by the Biden administration and the current has nothing to do with these. This is the kind of transparency we can now expect.
https://electrek.co/2025/02/12/us-s...et-line-for-armored-teslas-worth-400-million/