md2023
Well-Known Member
Good points. As you say most people, including you, take some actions. And many, if not all large corporations are involved in questionable activities/donations/bribes/labor practices etc. Investigating all would be extremely time-consuming, tedious, unreasonable, and well, depressing. So how and where to draw the line is a good and serious question. In my opinion it is put to each individual and I only speak for myself.So....I've never been to a BP station (okay, one time) since Deepwater Horizon either. So I do take some actions like that on principle.
But in this case VW (funding Rivian) has a much more muddied history than Tesla, and it's not even close. So does that imply avoiding VW, Audi, Porsche as well as Electrify America/Canada?
I guess we each choose our own battles, but Rivian doesn't exist without Tesla paving a way with EV's and a charging network. I don't follow the antics of the CEO's of Proctor & Gamble, Pfizer, GM, Ford or any other company. BTW, if you don't think these companies, much like big tobacco or big oil, aren't spending tens of millions of dollars a year on lobbying that you don't see beyond the glitzy ad buys that you do see you're just not looking. Media sensationalization is quite clearly negatively directed at Musk/Tesla because it drives rage clicks which in turn add up to page views which drive ad revenue. That sounds like a pretty dirty business model, so time to shut off all mainstream media as well?
Where does one draw a line, in all seriousness?
The media certainly drives some of the outrage for profit/power-based reasons (and it certainly isn't only directed at Musk/Tesla - see the largest, most watched news channel/outlet in the US).
However, much better information is readily available. Direct, unadulterated video, quotes, actions, etc.
Others can provide a litany of examples and they are not hard to find, but they include thinly veiled (and sometimes overt) support for antisemitism, neo nazi sympathizers, racism/white supremacy, and the wholesale denigration of groups of people (see civil servants, many of whom are working very hard and successfully for the betterment of others at a salary below what they could get because they believe in the goodness of humanity and our government -yes it does many good things, and it can continue to strive toward better equality of opportunity, while still not being perfect). This is partly where I draw the line (and only to an extent).
This is not to say that other people in the world, regardless of political, religious,etc. persuasion do not do and express horrible things. But importantly, Mr Musk is no longer only a CEO/director of private organizations, but an active member(?) of the US government. Many of us see him (and this administration) as a danger to the laws and NORMS of a government/country, with all its shortcomings and mistakes, that strives to have a positive impact on its citizens and the world. A world in which many truly horrific things happen.
Anyway, my two cents on why and where I draw the line. If the CEO of a corporation that I supported went out of his way to actively support and impact what Mr Musk has, I would not support them either. Where is the line? We have to each choose our own.
Sorry for length and personal views on an awesome site with lots of helpful information and posters, but you made a good point and asked a serious question relative to a serious topic with personal implications.
Sponsored