- First Name
- Rob
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2020
- Threads
- 31
- Messages
- 1,016
- Reaction score
- 2,367
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Vehicles
- Jeep & R1T
- Thread starter
- #76
Hello my dudes! Two things really quick:
First, I've been testing USB-A to USB-C adapters for folks who want the fastest charging speed and plan on using the OEM Apple MagSafe Charging Pads with the Power Kit. I've identified a matching adapter that both works well and fits easily. I'll be posting the link to the item on the Power Kit page tomorrow, and we'll be reselling them too.
If you already have a pre-order in for the Power Kit and want to add one of two of these to you order, please be on the lookout for an email about how to do so.
Second, I've also been going through the process of charge speed testing. I've tested with three different magnetic wireless charging pads using both the Power Kit and the center console. The results are a little surprising. Here is what I got using the center console:
Apple OEM Pad - 5.0V at 1.22A (6W)
JSAUX MagSafe Pad - 5.0V at 1.5A (7.5W)
Generic, Transparent Pad - 5.0V at 1A (5W)
Interestingly, it looks like the center console tops out at 5V - likely 5V at 2A for a total of 10W. Even when connecting via a wired connection, I've seen nothing to indicate that it puts out more than 10W, but I could be wrong.
If you compare that to an ideal situation for the Apple MagSafe Pad, it's even more interesting. Theoretically, the Apple OEM MagSafe Pad does peak at 15W for wireless charging. That however requires 9V and 2.22A, and even if a the supply can provide that, it both a slow ramp up to that speed, it requires your iPhone to be at under 80% charge, and it's thermally limited. Considering the lack of power from the center console, those other requirements won't even enter into the picture. At 6W though, it's disappointing.
As of this posting, I'm still working through the numbers for the numbers coming out of the Power Kit. The Apple OEM Pad really doesn't like the USB digital tester that I'm using, and I want to make sure I meet all of the requirements for a 'best case' test. I'm hoping to have that done soon. I'll post here when complete.
Regarding the JSAUX pad, I also have more testing to do there too. As of this post, I've repeatedly seen 9.00V at 1A (9W) on a nearly full iPhone and 9.00V at 1.27A (11.5W) on a Galaxy Z Fold 3 which theoretically tops out at 10W. That's 3W faster on the iPhone and 4W faster on a Samsung device - both an excellent percentage increase. I'm going to retest again to validate the 11.5W speed and breakout the Pixel 7 which supports 20W. (the pad is only rated for 15W tops)
Finally, it's also worth nothing that the generic pad pretty much sucked everywhere. It also refused to charge on the Power Kit, likely due to either a very limited power table in the pad firmware or a problematic USB-A to USB-C adapter. (the adapter is included in the box with this and the JSAUX charger) I'll confirm this in the next post.
Aaand this post is a wall of text. Sorry about that! I hope it helps number-geeks, and I suddenly realize why Kyle's videos can be so long. Hopefully this long post makes up for it in density though.
First, I've been testing USB-A to USB-C adapters for folks who want the fastest charging speed and plan on using the OEM Apple MagSafe Charging Pads with the Power Kit. I've identified a matching adapter that both works well and fits easily. I'll be posting the link to the item on the Power Kit page tomorrow, and we'll be reselling them too.
If you already have a pre-order in for the Power Kit and want to add one of two of these to you order, please be on the lookout for an email about how to do so.
Second, I've also been going through the process of charge speed testing. I've tested with three different magnetic wireless charging pads using both the Power Kit and the center console. The results are a little surprising. Here is what I got using the center console:
Apple OEM Pad - 5.0V at 1.22A (6W)
JSAUX MagSafe Pad - 5.0V at 1.5A (7.5W)
Generic, Transparent Pad - 5.0V at 1A (5W)
Interestingly, it looks like the center console tops out at 5V - likely 5V at 2A for a total of 10W. Even when connecting via a wired connection, I've seen nothing to indicate that it puts out more than 10W, but I could be wrong.
If you compare that to an ideal situation for the Apple MagSafe Pad, it's even more interesting. Theoretically, the Apple OEM MagSafe Pad does peak at 15W for wireless charging. That however requires 9V and 2.22A, and even if a the supply can provide that, it both a slow ramp up to that speed, it requires your iPhone to be at under 80% charge, and it's thermally limited. Considering the lack of power from the center console, those other requirements won't even enter into the picture. At 6W though, it's disappointing.
As of this posting, I'm still working through the numbers for the numbers coming out of the Power Kit. The Apple OEM Pad really doesn't like the USB digital tester that I'm using, and I want to make sure I meet all of the requirements for a 'best case' test. I'm hoping to have that done soon. I'll post here when complete.
Regarding the JSAUX pad, I also have more testing to do there too. As of this post, I've repeatedly seen 9.00V at 1A (9W) on a nearly full iPhone and 9.00V at 1.27A (11.5W) on a Galaxy Z Fold 3 which theoretically tops out at 10W. That's 3W faster on the iPhone and 4W faster on a Samsung device - both an excellent percentage increase. I'm going to retest again to validate the 11.5W speed and breakout the Pixel 7 which supports 20W. (the pad is only rated for 15W tops)
Finally, it's also worth nothing that the generic pad pretty much sucked everywhere. It also refused to charge on the Power Kit, likely due to either a very limited power table in the pad firmware or a problematic USB-A to USB-C adapter. (the adapter is included in the box with this and the JSAUX charger) I'll confirm this in the next post.
Aaand this post is a wall of text. Sorry about that! I hope it helps number-geeks, and I suddenly realize why Kyle's videos can be so long. Hopefully this long post makes up for it in density though.
Sponsored