kanundrum
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
- Threads
- 218
- Messages
- 3,988
- Reaction score
- 12,156
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Vehicles
- Giulia QV, R1S (S00N)
- Occupation
- IT
- Thread starter
- #1
Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
yes, you should. If you don't have a reason for 20"s due to your use case 21"s are probably the right moveThanks for the sharing.
The more reviews I read makes me to think that I should switch to 21” tires instead of 20”.
Aren’t those the 22s they have on?Thanks for the sharing.
The more reviews I read makes me to think that I should switch to 21” tires instead of 20”.
I don't know if this translates forward to today and the Rivian brand, but some years back i bought a used lease-return Range Rover with standard road tires. At least, insofar as I'm aware, the tires did not appear to be particularly designed for off road.yes, you should. If you don't have a reason for 20"s due to your use case 21"s are probably the right move
Yea, I saw that too.. the article mentioned they spent more time with an R1S with the 20s than the 22s, but all the pictures were of a R1S with the 22s. Seemed a bit odd. They also noted a rougher ride on the 20s compared to the 22s, but I believe previous reviews I had read noted the 22s rode a bit harsher due to less rubber (which makes sense).Aren’t those the 22s they have on?
Sure, if the look is most important to you then the 20s are the way to go. But I’ve found the 21s great on AND off road. The extra miles on EVERY charge is a nice bonus.Shorter wheelbase will be less comfortable so going up to the 21s would make sense but I really don’t want to lose the off-road ability of this vehicle. Very little aftermarket (if any) in terms of wheels so I’m sticking with the 20s (plus it makes the whole thing look so much better).
My Jeep GC Overland came on 20s with All Season tires. I’ve never had any issues with the places in the desert or on other trails I have taken it. I am not a hardcore off roader. I ordered the 22s for my R1S as they appear to have the same size sidewall as my Jeep and they have suited me fine for 8 years.I don't know if this translates forward to today and the Rivian brand, but some years back i bought a used lease-return Range Rover with standard road tires. At least, insofar as I'm aware, the tires did not appear to be particularly designed for off road.
I took part in some pretty radical off road driving in courses offered by the Land Rover dealer; I'm talking rock crawling. And I had no issues whatsoever; the car handled like a dream.
Loved that Land Rover every single day that it actually would start and ran. [Land Rover reliability still sucks to this day]
I have learned to defer to the wisdom and experience of you rock crawlers out there; you know more than me about overland driving.
But I do find myself wondering if, for the occasional off road experience, we're getting too wound up over what wheels and tires we put on the R1S.
I've configured my order for the 21" and feel confident that for the level of moderate off road driving I'll do that they will perform well enough to suit my needs. I place a higher priority on capturing that range sweet spot that is found at 21".
This is not the car you'll take across the Sahara or the Serengeti. Rivian's Adventure Network isn't going there.
So, is this really a great road car that also has impressive off road credentials for short treks? Or are some of us seeing this as a great off road car first and foremost, with road credentials kind of taking a back seat?
My priority is on range.
But that's me, and you need to do you.
I can understand that. I’ve had Land Rovers that did amazing off-road with street tires.Sure, if the look is most important to you then the 20s are the way to go. But I’ve found the 21s great on AND off road. The extra miles on EVERY charge is a nice bonus.
Having owned Suburbans, it doesn't sound much different from that 3rd row. It's fine for kids. I'm 6-3 and sat back there a few times to try it out. It's ok for short hauls for taller adults. 3rd row seat position (and therefore leg room) is somewhat dictated by the wheel base. It pretty much has to sit over top the rear axle or rear motors. 3 row vehicles are always design challenged and compromised.Looks great for the most part. Biggest disappointment is lack of 3rd row legroom / floor space. Disappointed they couldn’t have done a better job with that. And how the 2nd row moves (or lack there of) for 3rd row access.
It's going to be somewhat tighter than a Suburban as it's quite a bit shorter overall, but as you say, having the 3rd row over the rear axle imposes unavoidable limitations. I've argued for this, but just as Chevy stretches the Tahoe to make the Suburban, I'd love to see Rivian stretch the R1S to give the rear seats more room.Having owned Suburbans, it doesn't sound much different from that 3rd row. It's fine for kids. I'm 6-3 and sat back there a few times to try it out. It's ok for short hauls for taller adults. 3rd row seat position (and therefore leg room) is somewhat dictated by the wheel base. It pretty much has to sit over top the rear axle or rear motors. 3 row vehicles are always design challenged and compromised.
Someone made a neat composite image of the R1S back end on an R1T. Looked suburban-esque. Seems like a straightforward thing for rivisn to do at some point. Bigger battery would fit too.It's going to be somewhat tighter than a Suburban as it's quite a bit shorter overall, but as you say, having the 3rd row over the rear axle imposes unavoidable limitations. I've argued for this, but just as Chevy stretches the Tahoe to make the Suburban, I'd love to see Rivian stretch the R1S to give the rear seats more room.