Netz1Niner
Member
- First Name
- Jer
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2024
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 8
- Location
- Wake Forest, NC
- Vehicles
- 2025 Gen2 R1T TriMax, Storm Blue, 22” Range, Black Mountain + Brown Ash
There are checks and balances for what you’re worried about. If the noise doesn’t go away and more repair is needed, guess who has to suck it up and basically work for free until they find the issue? Rivian and all makes have their warranty guideline labor times. A tech can only claim the operations that apply to each diagnosis and repair.For comparison, I pulled service records from my X3M and G63 and both say something along the lines of "performed test drive, confirmed issue resolved." Saying you drove for X amount of time when you in fact did not is bad record-keeping. I'll say it again, maybe if they had driven it for "tHiRtY mInUtEs ?" they'd have realized it still rode like shit.
It's wild that so many of you defend this kind of documentation. Next time you go to the doctor, see if you give them that same kind of grace if they bill you for an hour when you're only there for 20 minutes because your issue was one that they "learned from experience and memorize from repetition" on how to treat it.
Let me try to reframe what I’m trying to point out
An average brake jobs pays 1.2 hours of labor.
The first time a tech did one, it may have taken them 3hours
The second time, 2.5 hours
the third time 2 hours
the fourth time 1.2 hours
……
the 100th time .8 hours
……
the 1000th time .5 hours
Should you pay a tech that has done it a 1000 times less than a guy that has done it once? Should you only pay the 1000 time tech only .5 hrs? Should you pay the first time tech all 3 hours???
It’s the same concept for warranty repairs. As long as the repair was done correctly, the documentation needs to show everything that has been done to get paid. If they leave something off, they don’t get paid for it. You can’t claim more than is allowed, so you shouldn’t claim and thing less.
Sponsored