joshuaali
Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I've created a list of every compatible tire from Tire Rack (i.e. passenger tires with a minimum load index of 116, or light truck tires with a minimum load index of 113).
It's split into three sheets—one for each wheel diameter. There are some filter views (Data > Filter views) to filter by type, or you can create your own temporary filter view.
Direct link
A note on weight:
It's split into three sheets—one for each wheel diameter. There are some filter views (Data > Filter views) to filter by type, or you can create your own temporary filter view.
Direct link
A note on weight:
For the last point, this could probably be its own thread, but despite all the conjecture across car forums, the only semi-scientific test I've seen is Tire Rack's:
- I'm not convinced that wheel/tire weight is that big of a factor for efficiency, especially compared to a tire's tread/compound ("rolling resistance").
Tire Total weight (lbs) Average speed (mph) Fuel economy (mpg) Michelin Energy MXV4 Plus (Grand Touring) 42.5 38.7 22.8 Pirelli P Zero Asimmetrico (Max Performance) 38.5 39.0 21.5 Pirelli P Zero Asimmetrico (Max Performance) 48.5 38.8 21.1
Comparing the first and second wheel/tire combination, despite a 9.4% weight saving, and 1% difference in speed, fuel economy went down by 5.7%, all because of the tire's rolling resistance.
Comparing the second and third wheel/tire combination, despite a 26% increase in weight, and 1% difference in speed, fuel economy only went down by 1.9%.
tl;dr: weight probably isn't as big of a factor as you think.
Sponsored
Last edited: