Sponsored

Inital thoughts on gen 2 Tri vs gen 1 quad.

Donald Stanfield

Well-Known Member
First Name
Donald
Joined
Jul 31, 2022
Threads
52
Messages
6,996
Reaction score
13,603
Location
USA
Vehicles
2025 R1S Tri Ascend, 2024 i4 M50
Occupation
Stuff and things
My gen 1 quad has been traded in for a gen 2 tri motor Ascend. I have driven it a bit now, enough to put some thoughts together on the differences and whether or not I feel the upgrade is worth it for existing owners.

Interior quality

The interior has received some minor changes for the Ascend models: different trim and wood and, in my case, a different color scheme with the slate sky and walnut wood. Rivian has also added stitching on the steering wheel and several other places. The seats are also different. Rivian is attempting to differentiate the Ascend models and build them of higher quality. While the changes seem small, they do a great job of creating a more premium experience. The interior of my previous quad was decent, but I felt it was lacking in the price point they were asking for. The Ascend interior I purchased has those little details in execution that make it seem like the 112K dollar car it is.

Mechanicals

I had great luck with my Gen 1's reliability. That said, the suspension was loud, with clicks and pops being common. My Gen 2 has none of these and also less wind noise. Compared to my gen 1 the two is much more refined in the mechanical department, even compared to an excellent example of a gen 1. I only have a couple of hundred miles on the gen 2 so hopefully this experience continues.

Driving Dynamics

I switched to an S from a T so I'm not sure how well I can compare these two. I also never had street tires before. I ordered my R1T gen 1 with the 21" range wheels; when I bought 22, I put the Michelin 119s on it. So some of this might be because I switched to an SUV or because of the wheels but it is clear Rivian put some work in the gen 2 suspension. The car handles the winding roads better than the gen 1 and the tires hook up an go better than my gen 1 did.

The tri feels faster as well; the torque makes it snappier. The Gen 2 feels much closer to my wife's i4M50 than my Gen 1 did. I am 100% satisfied with the performance and driving feel, which is good because I was considering waiting for the quad. Plus, the accelerating feeling is more aggressive because of the rear power bias, having two motors back there and one up front. I don't need the quad; the tri gives me the same feeling as my BMW. That's the feeling that the truck has way more to give than the road and traffic allow. Any more speed at this point would add to that frustration.

Sound quality

The Gen 2 premium audio is good with the latest software update. However, this is the only area worse than my Gen 1 quad. The Meridian system in my Gen 1 was hands down the best system I've ever had in a car after the updates. Gen 2 is a step down, but it is still pretty good. I wish I could carry over the Meridian, as that would make this the perfect SUV.

Technology

The tech is better in Gen 2, which is a welcome change. This is my first car with hands-free lane changes, and I didn't think it would be as nice as it is. I am more impressed with the auto bright lights. That is a very nice feature. I live in a rural area, and the extra illumination is welcome on these country roads. The cameras are also a substantial difference. You can see much better on occasions when the cameras are needed. The roof is a neat little trick as is the hazard light thing.

Overall impressions

I am impressed with the Gen 2; it is better than my Gen 1 in almost every way. I only did the trade because I needed an SUV as our son is getting bigger, and we have two big dogs. They didn't all fit in the truck. The upgrade would have been a more difficult choice if I had not had this problem. If you're wondering whether you should upgrade, I would say upgrade if interior styling and refinement are important. Upgrade if tech is important. If you're looking for an increase in speed, it is there, but it's pretty close to the Gen 1 quad. Overall if you have the money to burn I think you would be happy with the new gen 2.
Sponsored

 

BigE

Well-Known Member
First Name
Eric
Joined
Nov 19, 2020
Threads
41
Messages
830
Reaction score
1,391
Location
North Carolina
Vehicles
Rivian R1T, Honda S2000
My gen 1 quad has been traded in for a gen 2 tri motor Ascend. I have driven it a bit now, enough to put some thoughts together on the differences and whether or not I feel the upgrade is worth it for existing owners.

Interior quality

The interior has received some minor changes for the Ascend models: different trim and wood and, in my case, a different color scheme with the slate sky and walnut wood. Rivian has also added stitching on the steering wheel and several other places. The seats are also different. Rivian is attempting to differentiate the Ascend models and build them of higher quality. While the changes seem small, they do a great job of creating a more premium experience. The interior of my previous quad was decent, but I felt it was lacking in the price point they were asking for. The Ascend interior I purchased has those little details in execution that make it seem like the 112K dollar car it is.

Mechanicals

I had great luck with my Gen 1's reliability. That said, the suspension was loud, with clicks and pops being common. My Gen 2 has none of these and also less wind noise. Compared to my gen 1 the two is much more refined in the mechanical department, even compared to an excellent example of a gen 1. I only have a couple of hundred miles on the gen 2 so hopefully this experience continues.

Driving Dynamics

I switched to an S from a T so I'm not sure how well I can compare these two. I also never had street tires before. I ordered my R1T gen 1 with the 21" range wheels; when I bought 22, I put the Michelin 119s on it. So some of this might be because I switched to an SUV or because of the wheels but it is clear Rivian put some work in the gen 2 suspension. The car handles the winding roads better than the gen 1 and the tires hook up an go better than my gen 1 did.

The tri feels faster as well; the torque makes it snappier. The Gen 2 feels much closer to my wife's i4M50 than my Gen 1 did. I am 100% satisfied with the performance and driving feel, which is good because I was considering waiting for the quad. Plus, the accelerating feeling is more aggressive because of the rear power bias, having two motors back there and one up front. I don't need the quad; the tri gives me the same feeling as my BMW. That's the feeling that the truck has way more to give than the road and traffic allow. Any more speed at this point would add to that frustration.

Sound quality

The Gen 2 premium audio is good with the latest software update. However, this is the only area worse than my Gen 1 quad. The Meridian system in my Gen 1 was hands down the best system I've ever had in a car after the updates. Gen 2 is a step down, but it is still pretty good. I wish I could carry over the Meridian, as that would make this the perfect SUV.

Technology

The tech is better in Gen 2, which is a welcome change. This is my first car with hands-free lane changes, and I didn't think it would be as nice as it is. I am more impressed with the auto bright lights. That is a very nice feature. I live in a rural area, and the extra illumination is welcome on these country roads. The cameras are also a substantial difference. You can see much better on occasions when the cameras are needed. The roof is a neat little trick as is the hazard light thing.

Overall impressions

I am impressed with the Gen 2; it is better than my Gen 1 in almost every way. I only did the trade because I needed an SUV as our son is getting bigger, and we have two big dogs. They didn't all fit in the truck. The upgrade would have been a more difficult choice if I had not had this problem. If you're wondering whether you should upgrade, I would say upgrade if interior styling and refinement are important. Upgrade if tech is important. If you're looking for an increase in speed, it is there, but it's pretty close to the Gen 1 quad. Overall if you have the money to burn I think you would be happy with the new gen 2.
Appreciate the feedback and taking time to share your experience. Thank you
 

Chinna

Well-Known Member
First Name
Naren
Joined
Jun 22, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
84
Reaction score
52
Location
Albany NY
Vehicles
RIVIAN R1S, MACH-E4X
Occupation
Software developer
I like the changes in the Gen 2, but the price increase from $77K to $112K is steep. I don't think the upgrade is worth it unless you really need the extra features.
 
OP
OP
Donald Stanfield

Donald Stanfield

Well-Known Member
First Name
Donald
Joined
Jul 31, 2022
Threads
52
Messages
6,996
Reaction score
13,603
Location
USA
Vehicles
2025 R1S Tri Ascend, 2024 i4 M50
Occupation
Stuff and things
I like the changes in the Gen 2, but the price increase from $77K to $112K is steep. I don't think the upgrade is worth it unless you really need the extra features.
Gen 2's dont start at 112, that's the Ascend trim level. It's meant to be a premium trim, not the baseline. I agree it's pricey and nothing on there is essential. Then again 77K is well above what you'd need to spend to get something just for transportation.
 

El_Greco

Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Aug 9, 2023
Threads
4
Messages
18
Reaction score
8
Location
Boulder, CO
Vehicles
R1S
Occupation
Self
Clubs
 
My gen 1 quad has been traded in for a gen 2 tri motor Ascend. I have driven it a bit now, enough to put some thoughts together on the differences and whether or not I feel the upgrade is worth it for existing owners.

Interior quality

The interior has received some minor changes for the Ascend models: different trim and wood and, in my case, a different color scheme with the slate sky and walnut wood. Rivian has also added stitching on the steering wheel and several other places. The seats are also different. Rivian is attempting to differentiate the Ascend models and build them of higher quality. While the changes seem small, they do a great job of creating a more premium experience. The interior of my previous quad was decent, but I felt it was lacking in the price point they were asking for. The Ascend interior I purchased has those little details in execution that make it seem like the 112K dollar car it is.

Mechanicals

I had great luck with my Gen 1's reliability. That said, the suspension was loud, with clicks and pops being common. My Gen 2 has none of these and also less wind noise. Compared to my gen 1 the two is much more refined in the mechanical department, even compared to an excellent example of a gen 1. I only have a couple of hundred miles on the gen 2 so hopefully this experience continues.

Driving Dynamics

I switched to an S from a T so I'm not sure how well I can compare these two. I also never had street tires before. I ordered my R1T gen 1 with the 21" range wheels; when I bought 22, I put the Michelin 119s on it. So some of this might be because I switched to an SUV or because of the wheels but it is clear Rivian put some work in the gen 2 suspension. The car handles the winding roads better than the gen 1 and the tires hook up an go better than my gen 1 did.

The tri feels faster as well; the torque makes it snappier. The Gen 2 feels much closer to my wife's i4M50 than my Gen 1 did. I am 100% satisfied with the performance and driving feel, which is good because I was considering waiting for the quad. Plus, the accelerating feeling is more aggressive because of the rear power bias, having two motors back there and one up front. I don't need the quad; the tri gives me the same feeling as my BMW. That's the feeling that the truck has way more to give than the road and traffic allow. Any more speed at this point would add to that frustration.

Sound quality

The Gen 2 premium audio is good with the latest software update. However, this is the only area worse than my Gen 1 quad. The Meridian system in my Gen 1 was hands down the best system I've ever had in a car after the updates. Gen 2 is a step down, but it is still pretty good. I wish I could carry over the Meridian, as that would make this the perfect SUV.

Technology

The tech is better in Gen 2, which is a welcome change. This is my first car with hands-free lane changes, and I didn't think it would be as nice as it is. I am more impressed with the auto bright lights. That is a very nice feature. I live in a rural area, and the extra illumination is welcome on these country roads. The cameras are also a substantial difference. You can see much better on occasions when the cameras are needed. The roof is a neat little trick as is the hazard light thing.

Overall impressions

I am impressed with the Gen 2; it is better than my Gen 1 in almost every way. I only did the trade because I needed an SUV as our son is getting bigger, and we have two big dogs. They didn't all fit in the truck. The upgrade would have been a more difficult choice if I had not had this problem. If you're wondering whether you should upgrade, I would say upgrade if interior styling and refinement are important. Upgrade if tech is important. If you're looking for an increase in speed, it is there, but it's pretty close to the Gen 1 quad. Overall if you have the money to burn I think you would be happy with the new gen 2.
What are the differences in range?
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
Donald Stanfield

Donald Stanfield

Well-Known Member
First Name
Donald
Joined
Jul 31, 2022
Threads
52
Messages
6,996
Reaction score
13,603
Location
USA
Vehicles
2025 R1S Tri Ascend, 2024 i4 M50
Occupation
Stuff and things
What are the differences in range?
Too early to say for sure. In conserve on the freeway I was getting a little better than my old quad. I'm also not the best person to ask for daily driving because I use all 850HP on a fairly regular basis.
 

Hugh

Member
First Name
Hugh
Joined
Sep 9, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
20
Reaction score
16
Location
Ontario, Canada
Vehicles
2024 R1S
Occupation
Retired
Thanks for your observations. I had to decide whether to wait for a Gen 2 dual or tri or get a Gen 1 (R1S) quad from the shop. In the end I got the Gen 1 as I couldn’t justify the extra CA$20-30K as I was already near the top of my budget. I’m really happy with what I got but I’m glad to see so many people happy with their Gen 2s.
 

El_Greco

Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Aug 9, 2023
Threads
4
Messages
18
Reaction score
8
Location
Boulder, CO
Vehicles
R1S
Occupation
Self
Clubs
 
Too early to say for sure. In conserve on the freeway I was getting a little better than my old quad. I'm also not the best person to ask for daily driving because I use all 850HP on a fairly regular basis.
What do does your Gen 2 allege to have when charged up to 100%, compared to your Gen 1?
 
OP
OP
Donald Stanfield

Donald Stanfield

Well-Known Member
First Name
Donald
Joined
Jul 31, 2022
Threads
52
Messages
6,996
Reaction score
13,603
Location
USA
Vehicles
2025 R1S Tri Ascend, 2024 i4 M50
Occupation
Stuff and things
Thanks for your observations. I had to decide whether to wait for a Gen 2 dual or tri or get a Gen 1 (R1S) quad from the shop. In the end I got the Gen 1 as I couldn’t justify the extra CA$20-30K as I was already near the top of my budget. I’m really happy with what I got but I’m glad to see so many people happy with their Gen 2s.
That was probably a good choice. The gen 2 is better, but not worth breaking a budget over.
 
OP
OP
Donald Stanfield

Donald Stanfield

Well-Known Member
First Name
Donald
Joined
Jul 31, 2022
Threads
52
Messages
6,996
Reaction score
13,603
Location
USA
Vehicles
2025 R1S Tri Ascend, 2024 i4 M50
Occupation
Stuff and things
What do does your Gen 2 allege to have when charged up to 100%, compared to your Gen 1?
Dunno, never had it up to 100 yet.
 

Sponsored

Chinna

Well-Known Member
First Name
Naren
Joined
Jun 22, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
84
Reaction score
52
Location
Albany NY
Vehicles
RIVIAN R1S, MACH-E4X
Occupation
Software developer
Gen 2's dont start at 112, that's the Ascend trim level. It's meant to be a premium trim, not the baseline. I agree it's pricey and nothing on there is essential. Then again 77K is well above what you'd need to spend to get something just for transportation.
I did a comparison of the Gen 1 quad and the Gen 2 tri-motor as they have similar power other model not even close to gen 1 quad. I know When it comes to buying a vehicle, there are a lot of options to choose from in different price range , but here we talking about comparing the Gen 1 quad to the Gen 2 tri.
 
OP
OP
Donald Stanfield

Donald Stanfield

Well-Known Member
First Name
Donald
Joined
Jul 31, 2022
Threads
52
Messages
6,996
Reaction score
13,603
Location
USA
Vehicles
2025 R1S Tri Ascend, 2024 i4 M50
Occupation
Stuff and things
I did a comparison of the Gen 1 quad and the Gen 2 tri-motor as they have similar power other model not even close to gen 1 quad. I know When it comes to buying a vehicle, there are a lot of options to choose from in different price range , but here we talking about comparing the Gen 1 quad to the Gen 2 tri.
The gen 1 quad is more than 77k. A lot more, unless we are talking used.
 

meshugy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Oct 18, 2024
Threads
4
Messages
233
Reaction score
167
Location
seattle
Vehicles
2023 Rivian R1S Quad Large, 2007 Volvo XC70
The gen 1 quad is more than 77k. A lot more, unless we are talking used.
Very few, if any new Gen 1 Quads left. I saw about four on Rivian Roamer last month. Priced in the $88K-$95K range, but the lease deals were super good at around $700/mo or less.

Still a fair amount of very low mile used Quads around, effectively new demos/or early lease returns.
 
Last edited:

Rividiculous

Well-Known Member
First Name
Eric
Joined
Nov 23, 2023
Threads
11
Messages
535
Reaction score
1,002
Location
New York City
Vehicles
2025 R1S, 2006 3 series
My gen 1 quad has been traded in for a gen 2 tri motor Ascend. I have driven it a bit now, enough to put some thoughts together on the differences and whether or not I feel the upgrade is worth it for existing owners.

Interior quality

The interior has received some minor changes for the Ascend models: different trim and wood and, in my case, a different color scheme with the slate sky and walnut wood. Rivian has also added stitching on the steering wheel and several other places. The seats are also different. Rivian is attempting to differentiate the Ascend models and build them of higher quality. While the changes seem small, they do a great job of creating a more premium experience. The interior of my previous quad was decent, but I felt it was lacking in the price point they were asking for. The Ascend interior I purchased has those little details in execution that make it seem like the 112K dollar car it is.

Mechanicals

I had great luck with my Gen 1's reliability. That said, the suspension was loud, with clicks and pops being common. My Gen 2 has none of these and also less wind noise. Compared to my gen 1 the two is much more refined in the mechanical department, even compared to an excellent example of a gen 1. I only have a couple of hundred miles on the gen 2 so hopefully this experience continues.

Driving Dynamics

I switched to an S from a T so I'm not sure how well I can compare these two. I also never had street tires before. I ordered my R1T gen 1 with the 21" range wheels; when I bought 22, I put the Michelin 119s on it. So some of this might be because I switched to an SUV or because of the wheels but it is clear Rivian put some work in the gen 2 suspension. The car handles the winding roads better than the gen 1 and the tires hook up an go better than my gen 1 did.

The tri feels faster as well; the torque makes it snappier. The Gen 2 feels much closer to my wife's i4M50 than my Gen 1 did. I am 100% satisfied with the performance and driving feel, which is good because I was considering waiting for the quad. Plus, the accelerating feeling is more aggressive because of the rear power bias, having two motors back there and one up front. I don't need the quad; the tri gives me the same feeling as my BMW. That's the feeling that the truck has way more to give than the road and traffic allow. Any more speed at this point would add to that frustration.

Sound quality

The Gen 2 premium audio is good with the latest software update. However, this is the only area worse than my Gen 1 quad. The Meridian system in my Gen 1 was hands down the best system I've ever had in a car after the updates. Gen 2 is a step down, but it is still pretty good. I wish I could carry over the Meridian, as that would make this the perfect SUV.

Technology

The tech is better in Gen 2, which is a welcome change. This is my first car with hands-free lane changes, and I didn't think it would be as nice as it is. I am more impressed with the auto bright lights. That is a very nice feature. I live in a rural area, and the extra illumination is welcome on these country roads. The cameras are also a substantial difference. You can see much better on occasions when the cameras are needed. The roof is a neat little trick as is the hazard light thing.

Overall impressions

I am impressed with the Gen 2; it is better than my Gen 1 in almost every way. I only did the trade because I needed an SUV as our son is getting bigger, and we have two big dogs. They didn't all fit in the truck. The upgrade would have been a more difficult choice if I had not had this problem. If you're wondering whether you should upgrade, I would say upgrade if interior styling and refinement are important. Upgrade if tech is important. If you're looking for an increase in speed, it is there, but it's pretty close to the Gen 1 quad. Overall if you have the money to burn I think you would be happy with the new gen 2.
Thank you for the write up. Glad you are liking the Gen2. I was hoping you would share your thoughts about your switch given your thoughtful posts.

(I don’t always agree, but they are thoughtful. ;) )
 

aAlpine

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2019
Threads
25
Messages
415
Reaction score
742
Location
Victoria, BC
Vehicles
2024 Quad R1S, Ioniq 5
What do does your Gen 2 allege to have when charged up to 100%, compared to your Gen 1?
"allege" being the key word ;)

Gen 1 trip computer estimates seem to be conservative (accurate on highway drives!), while Gen 2 EPA ratings have very suspicious gains. I'd be really curious about some side-by-side gen 1 vs gen 2 testing about actual real-world efficiency gains @OutofSpecKyle
Sponsored

 
 








Top