Sponsored

Gen2 Quad Motor Pricing Leaked by Costco! R1S = $115,900 / R1T = $109,900

Swezey

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Jul 18, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
156
Reaction score
190
Location
ATX
Vehicles
'23 R1T QM LBP 21" Rivian Blue
Occupation
Software Engineer
Clubs
 
Yes I know. But we don't even know what Gen 3 entails and how different it will be to Gen 2. Retrofit fitting can be labor intensive and not worth the cost and resources for OEMs to offer. It's always more profitable to funnel people into new cars. Plus, quarterly reports track production/deliveries (so does Wall St.), not retrofits. I work in the car business.
We're speculating here. That part is (should be) obvious. You came in with a hard opinion of "no car company will survive doing that"...yet Tesla is and has been doing just that.

The car business? I've met & dealt w/ plenty of sales and managers at dealerships that "work in the cars business". That, unfortunately, doesn't mean anything. Do you work in a modern EV start up that has a direct to consumer model?
Sponsored

 

windblowlc

Well-Known Member
First Name
Loc
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Threads
14
Messages
890
Reaction score
796
Location
WV
Vehicles
Porsche 911 Turbo S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Occupation
Retired
It's always more profitable to funnel people into new cars. Plus, quarterly reports track production/deliveries (so does Wall St.), not retrofits. I work in the car business.
This is obvious truth. For Rivian as a startup car company, if they can't sell new cars because people elect to upgrade what they have, it would be tough to stay in business. I have never known a car company who takes this approach. I'm a long time Porsche owner of multiple models and have never seen Porsche providing an upgrade path for existing current models. If you want the latest and greatest, buy the new one. They do offer upgrades for models three or four generations back because those owners are not interested in trading in.
 

Electrified Outdoors

Well-Known Member
Site Sponsor
First Name
Ken
Joined
Jan 30, 2023
Threads
61
Messages
3,587
Reaction score
3,867
Location
Mount Airy, Maryland
Website
www.ElectrifiedOutdoors.com
Vehicles
2024 Rivian R1S Quad, 2024 Silverado EV RST First Edition
Occupation
Real Estate
Clubs
 
I like the purple but I am originally from Baltimore and a huge Baltimore Ravens fan. Looking forward to quad.
 

UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan

Well-Known Member
First Name
Barnum
Joined
Mar 20, 2023
Threads
39
Messages
5,068
Reaction score
6,744
Location
SoCal
Vehicles
'23 GW Quad-Large R1T "Ghost"
Occupation
Advertising Circus
This is obvious truth. For Rivian as a startup car company, if they can't sell new cars because people elect to upgrade what they have, it would be tough to stay in business. I have never known a car company who takes this approach. I'm a long time Porsche owner of multiple models and have never seen Porsche providing an upgrade path for existing current models. If you want the latest and greatest, buy the new one. They do offer upgrades for models three or four generations back because those owners are not interested in trading in.
And those who disagree hate to hear this simple truth because it doesn’t conform to their personal preferences. Another simple truth, motivations of an individual consumer isn’t the same as those of a business and often completely opposite. OEM want to make most amount of profit per car. Consumers want most feature per dollar (some even want/expect things for free).
 
Last edited:

UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan

Well-Known Member
First Name
Barnum
Joined
Mar 20, 2023
Threads
39
Messages
5,068
Reaction score
6,744
Location
SoCal
Vehicles
'23 GW Quad-Large R1T "Ghost"
Occupation
Advertising Circus
The car business? I've met & dealt w/ plenty of sales and managers at dealerships that "work in the cars business". That, unfortunately, doesn't mean anything. Do you work in a modern EV start up that has a direct to consumer model?
I never said I work at the dealership level. I work on advertising for a OEM. Have done so for other OEMs in the past. I have regular interactions with people at North American HQ who manage marketing and sales, nationally and internationally. Occasionally, I interact with people from engineering and design.

Picture yourself managing a car company. If upgrade path means taking parts away from the production line (to make complete new cars) and paying one service tech 15 ~20 hours to complete the work (when he could have serviced 3 other cars in the same time frame on smaller tasks), vs enticing the customer to upgrade to a whole new car... You would choose the path with lower profit margin?! One is custom work done 100% by humans. The other is mass production workflow with some of the work done by robots. Henry Ford set the standard for manufacturing, which still stands 77 years since his death, for a good reason. Mass production is cheaper and more profitable. And for-profit businesses tend to chose to do things that are more profitable, not less.
 
Last edited:

Sponsored

Dave711

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Jul 27, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
136
Reaction score
58
Location
Long Beach, CA
Vehicles
Rivian R1S, Tesla Model YP, Lexus SC430
Clubs
 

Swezey

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Jul 18, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
156
Reaction score
190
Location
ATX
Vehicles
'23 R1T QM LBP 21" Rivian Blue
Occupation
Software Engineer
Clubs
 
This is obvious truth. For Rivian as a startup car company, if they can't sell new cars because people elect to upgrade what they have, it would be tough to stay in business. I have never known a car company who takes this approach. I'm a long time Porsche owner of multiple models and have never seen Porsche providing an upgrade path for existing current models. If you want the latest and greatest, buy the new one. They do offer upgrades for models three or four generations back because those owners are not interested in trading in.
You never heard of Tesla?
Comparing Porche to Rivian is not an apples to apples comparison.


And those who disagree hate to hear this simple truth because it doesn’t conform to their personal preferences. Another simple truth, motivations of an individual consumer isn’t the same as those of a business and often completely opposite. OEM want to make most amount of profit per car. Consumers want most feature per dollar (some even want/expect things for free).
Lol okay buddy - lot of assumptions there.
You're stating the obvious about consumers vs business needs.
But where you miss the mark is the consumer can actually influence the businesses' needs by something called feedback. It's not a closed sandbox where both are operating in their own segregated spaces.

I never said I work at the dealership level. I work on advertising for a OEM. Have done so for other OEMs in the past. I have regular interactions with people at North American HQ who manage marketing and sales, nationally and internationally. Occasionally, I interact with people from engineering and design.

Picture yourself managing a car company. If upgrade path means taking parts away from the production line to make complete new cars and paying for one tech 15 ~20 hours to complete the work (when he could have serviced 3 other cars in the same time frame), vs enticing the customer to upgrade to a whole new car... You would choose the path with lower profit margin?! One is custom work done 100% by humans. The other is mass production workflow with some of the work done by robots. Henry Ford set the standard for manufacturing, which still stands 77 years since his death, for a good reason. Mass production is cheaper and more profitable. And for-profit businesses tend to chose to do things that are more profitable, not less.
Lol again with the assumptions. I never stated you worked at a dealership. I simply made a statement to show that you stating "I work in the car business" doesn't bring much to the table in terms of facts. Rephrasing, "trust me, bro" doesn't add any weight to your arguments. Which is effectively what you did. Advertising, uh? Interesting.

In your mental model, you also neglected the people that won't upgrade due to costs and/or principal. Having an upgrade path for them, again, brings in additional revenue that the company wouldn't have seen otherwise. Hence, what Tesla, more so or less, trailblazed. Which you and others are completely ignoring. Which is an interesting observation.

You're assuming they would do this overnight and completely derail their product manufacturing lines. No one stated this would have to occur. You're also over-simplifying things and not realizing that this would be a planned, organized effort. IE: their parts and supplies would be accounted for leading up to this hypothetical upgrade path. In other words, not take away from their production lines.

You're also forgetting that B2B deals that Rivian has acquired. Upgradeability there is an interesting topic to increase profit margins.

All in all. Rivian isn't a traditional OEM. There are ton of reasons why they invested in a simplified, more modular approach in their hardware. And I'm willing to bet upgradeability is on their roadmap. And I have yet to read one logical reason why this isn't feasible in this thread.

"No one else does this": Wrong, Tesla does.
"Henry Ford...and the assembly line": Okay... that was a waste of keystrokes.
"I work in the car business": Anecdotal experiences doesn't account for much

We've already witnessed it at the software level.
Only matter of time till we see it at the hardware level.

It's not a matter of "if", but "when".
 

UnsungZero_OldTimeAdMan

Well-Known Member
First Name
Barnum
Joined
Mar 20, 2023
Threads
39
Messages
5,068
Reaction score
6,744
Location
SoCal
Vehicles
'23 GW Quad-Large R1T "Ghost"
Occupation
Advertising Circus
You never heard of Tesla?
Comparing Porche to Rivian is not an apples to apples comparison.




Lol okay buddy - lot of assumptions there.
You're stating the obvious about consumers vs business needs.
But where you miss the mark is the consumer can actually influence the businesses' needs by something called feedback. It's not a closed sandbox where both are operating in their own segregated spaces.



Lol again with the assumptions. I never stated you worked at a dealership. I simply made a statement to show that you stating "I work in the car business" doesn't bring much to the table in terms of facts. Rephrasing, "trust me, bro" doesn't add any weight to your arguments. Which is effectively what you did. Advertising, uh? Interesting.

In your mental model, you also neglected the people that won't upgrade due to costs and/or principal. Having an upgrade path for them, again, brings in additional revenue that the company wouldn't have seen otherwise. Hence, what Tesla, more so or less, trailblazed. Which you and others are completely ignoring. Which is an interesting observation.

You're assuming they would do this overnight and completely derail their product manufacturing lines. No one stated this would have to occur. You're also over-simplifying things and not realizing that this would be a planned, organized effort. IE: their parts and supplies would be accounted for leading up to this hypothetical upgrade path. In other words, not take away from their production lines.

You're also forgetting that B2B deals that Rivian has acquired. Upgradeability there is an interesting topic to increase profit margins.

All in all. Rivian isn't a traditional OEM. There are ton of reasons why they invested in a simplified, more modular approach in their hardware. And I'm willing to bet upgradeability is on their roadmap. And I have yet to read one logical reason why this isn't feasible in this thread.

"No one else does this": Wrong, Tesla does.
"Henry Ford...and the assembly line": Okay... that was a waste of keystrokes.
"I work in the car business": Anecdotal experiences doesn't account for much

We've already witnessed it at the software level.
Only matter of time till we see it at the hardware level.

It's not a matter of "if", but "when".
When gen 3 arrives, we'll know who's right. :)
 

Swezey

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Jul 18, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
156
Reaction score
190
Location
ATX
Vehicles
'23 R1T QM LBP 21" Rivian Blue
Occupation
Software Engineer
Clubs
 
And when it misses Gen 2 but Gen 3 has upgradeability?
Or what if it takes till Gen 4?

You're missing the point here and more concerned about being "right".
 

windblowlc

Well-Known Member
First Name
Loc
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Threads
14
Messages
890
Reaction score
796
Location
WV
Vehicles
Porsche 911 Turbo S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Occupation
Retired
You never heard of Tesla?
Comparing Porche to Rivian is not an apples to apples comparison.
Last I heard, they're both in the business to make cars.

Lol okay buddy - lot of assumptions there.
You're stating the obvious about consumers vs business needs.
But where you miss the mark is the consumer can actually influence the businesses' needs by something called feedback. It's not a closed sandbox where both are operating in their own segregated spaces.
For Rivian as a car maker, your feedback doesn't mean squat when it comes to their business model - that is to sell cars and make money. They have to show investors growth in the number of cars being sold year over year. Growth is king.

Having an upgrade path for them, again, brings in additional revenue that the company wouldn't have seen otherwise...

You're also forgetting that B2B deals that Rivian has acquired. Upgradeability there is an interesting topic to increase profit margins...

All in all. Rivian isn't a traditional OEM. There are ton of reasons why they invested in a simplified, more modular approach in their hardware. And I'm willing to bet upgradeability is on their roadmap. And I have yet to read one logical reason why this isn't feasible in this thread...

It's not a matter of "if", but "when".
That additional revenue, LOL, how much would that be in the scheme of things? Do they want to sell cars or do they want to sell parts? Enough said. Last but not least, a simplified, modular approach in hardware means less cost to manufacture and does not translate to upgradability to the consumers in their existing ownership. Bet all you want, you won't see any realized hardware upgrade path. There is no when. That would be giving away the advantage for Rivian as a startup trying to show how many cars they can sell.
 

Sponsored

Swezey

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Jul 18, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
156
Reaction score
190
Location
ATX
Vehicles
'23 R1T QM LBP 21" Rivian Blue
Occupation
Software Engineer
Clubs
 
Last I heard, they're both in the business to make cars.
Lol way to oversimplify things to fit your argument. Luckily that's not how the real world works :)
Perhaps you should read Rivian's mission statements?

https://rivian.com/our-company

Today we’re operating off hundreds of millions of years of accumulated plant- and animal-based carbon. On our current path, we will fully exhaust this stored energy in only a few generations and, in the process, carbonize our atmosphere to such a degree that life as we know it will not be possible. If the planet is to continue to sustain life and enchant future generations, we have to change.
....​
Integrating these decisions into a company-wide sustainability strategy is a foundational step on our path toward net-zero carbon emissions. Rivian has signed the Climate Pledge to reach that goal by 2040 — 10 years ahead of the Paris Agreement.

Guess what? Upgradability lowers waste. And fits their business model.
So yeah, a matter of "when" not "if".


For Rivian as a car maker, your feedback doesn't mean squat when it comes to their business model - that is to sell cars and make money. They have to show investors growth in the number of cars being sold year over year. Growth is king.
Feedback comes in all shapes a sizes. Verbal, written, silence, or whether or not I choose to purchase a product. Public opinion also plays a huge part as it's the collective of a common verbal or written opinion. So, once again, you're simply missing the bigger picture.


That additional revenue, LOL, how much would that be in the scheme of things? Do they want to sell cars or do they want to sell parts? Enough said. Last but not least, a simplified, modular approach in hardware means less cost to manufacture and does not translate to upgradability to the consumers in their existing ownership. Bet all you want, you won't see any realized hardware upgrade path. There is no when. That would be giving away the advantage for Rivian as a startup trying to show how many cars they can sell.
Ah, you're telling us more about yourself than you laughing alone at me.
No, not enough said. That's not how the real world works. You can sell both.

To bad this isn't Reddit where I can have a bot come back and remind me when you have egg on your face :)

Interesting how you two want to fight to resist change and be "right" and do whatever it takes except point to evidence or objective facts. But please by all means keep oversimplifying things and LOLing at me. It's quite entertaining.
 

windblowlc

Well-Known Member
First Name
Loc
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Threads
14
Messages
890
Reaction score
796
Location
WV
Vehicles
Porsche 911 Turbo S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Occupation
Retired
Lol way to oversimplify things to fit your argument. Luckily that's not how the real world works :)
Perhaps you should read Rivian's mission statements?

https://rivian.com/our-company

Today we’re operating off hundreds of millions of years of accumulated plant- and animal-based carbon. On our current path, we will fully exhaust this stored energy in only a few generations and, in the process, carbonize our atmosphere to such a degree that life as we know it will not be possible. If the planet is to continue to sustain life and enchant future generations, we have to change.
....​
Integrating these decisions into a company-wide sustainability strategy is a foundational step on our path toward net-zero carbon emissions. Rivian has signed the Climate Pledge to reach that goal by 2040 — 10 years ahead of the Paris Agreement.

Guess what? Upgradability lowers waste. And fits their business model.
So yeah, a matter of "when" not "if".

Feedback comes in all shapes a sizes. Verbal, written, silence, or whether or not I choose to purchase a product. Public opinion also plays a huge part as it's the collective of a common verbal or written opinion. So, once again, you're simply missing the bigger picture.

Ah, you're telling us more about yourself than you laughing alone at me.
No, not enough said. That's not how the real world works. You can sell both.

To bad this isn't Reddit where I can have a bot come back and remind me when you have egg on your face :)
Where did you read about the path to upgradability for the current model in Rivian's mission statement? You're reading what's never there. Period. I encourage you to give verbal, written or whatever feedback to Rivian. I'll wait to see the results or the egg, whatever.
 

Swezey

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Jul 18, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
156
Reaction score
190
Location
ATX
Vehicles
'23 R1T QM LBP 21" Rivian Blue
Occupation
Software Engineer
Clubs
 
Where did you read about the path to upgradability for the current model in Rivian's mission statement? You're reading what's never there. Period. I encourage you to give verbal, written or whatever feedback to Rivian. I'll wait to see the results or the egg, whatever.
I said it fits their model. In other words, it's implied that it's a future possibility.
Not that it was in it directly nor did I state I read it somewhere.
But, yes, keep doing what I said you'd would earlier :)

As of now Rivian hasn't announced anything in regards to upgradability involving the Gen2 platform specifically (going from Gen2)
They haven't stated it is or isn't in their roadmap. Or that it would or wouldn't be supported.

They have for Gen1. No dice there. And we have actual objective facts and reasons why that is a no-go.

Your bets are on that will never support upgradability, ever, as a "car company". That's great.

My bets is that it will eventually come. Are there more important factors and priorities? Yes, of course. Once they tackle and achieve those, I believe upgradeability will surface. As a start up, they have to remain flexible and hold their cards close. But sure, lets continue to compare them directly to Porche ?
 

windblowlc

Well-Known Member
First Name
Loc
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Threads
14
Messages
890
Reaction score
796
Location
WV
Vehicles
Porsche 911 Turbo S, Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Occupation
Retired
I said it fits their model. In other words, it's implied that it's a future possibility.
Not that it was in it directly nor did I state I read it somewhere.
But, yes, keep doing what I said you'd would earlier :)

As of now Rivian hasn't announced anything in regards to upgradability involving the Gen2 platform specifically (going from Gen2)
They haven't stated it is or isn't in their roadmap. Or that it would or wouldn't be supported.

They have for Gen1. No dice there. And we have actual objective facts and reasons why that is a no-go.

Your bets are on that will never support upgradability, ever, as a "car company". That's great.

My bets is that it will eventually come. Are there more important factors and priorities? Yes, of course. Once they tackle and achieve those, I believe upgradeability will surface. As a start up, they have to remain flexible and hold their cards close. But sure, lets continue to compare them directly to Porche ?
You can't compare them directly to Porche. Porche is the entrance of a house. Porsche is a German high-performance sports car manufacturer.
 

Swezey

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Jul 18, 2023
Threads
3
Messages
156
Reaction score
190
Location
ATX
Vehicles
'23 R1T QM LBP 21" Rivian Blue
Occupation
Software Engineer
Clubs
 
You can't compare them directly to Porche. Porche is the entrance of a house. Porsche is a German high-performance sports car manufacturer.
Then scroll up, pal. Because you did just that. ?

You're username is accurate, I'll say that!
Sponsored

 
 








Top