Sponsored

EV tax credit increase to $12,500 in Biden's latest proposal as of 10/28

SeaGeo

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brice
Joined
Jan 12, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
5,261
Reaction score
9,698
Location
Seattle
Vehicles
Xc60 T8
Occupation
Engineer
Can we say whole-heartedly that a BEV will have less of an environmental impact than today’s ICE over a 10 year span? I know a lot of us, including myself, have the belief that going electric is saving the environment but does it really? Sourcing materials to make batteries and producing electricity itself is damaging to the climate. So what gives? Where are we saving the environment? I’m purely asking for insight on what makes a BEV that much better ? Someone with knowledge on the subject please.
Yes.
Sponsored

 

dfx

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Nov 23, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
114
Reaction score
169
Location
Chicago
Vehicles
2001 LandCruiser, 2015 Model S 70D
I’d agree if they didn’t do the incentives subsidies for the fossil fuel industries for the last century
With you 100% on how the Govt sucked up to that industry. Now Big Oil is buying and building biofuel plants to reap the subsidies there and the world will get more deforestation as a result.
 

jjswan33

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joshua
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Threads
116
Messages
3,817
Reaction score
8,231
Location
Sandy, OR
Vehicles
Rivian R1T LE, Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited
Occupation
Engineer
Clubs
 
Can we say whole-heartedly that a BEV will have less of an environmental impact than today’s ICE over a 10 year span? I know a lot of us, including myself, have the belief that going electric is saving the environment but does it really? Sourcing materials to make batteries and producing electricity itself is damaging to the climate. So what gives? Where are we saving the environment? I’m purely asking for insight on what makes a BEV that much better ? Someone with knowledge on the subject please.
IMO it isn't the case that it will surely be an environmental win but in general I think the carbon cost to produce a BEV or a ICE are similar for a similarly sized vehicle but over time the ICE will produce continued carbon emissions. Now if you are solely charging your car with electricity produced by coal or some other dirty source then it will just be the difference in the efficiency of the vehicle (compare the MPGe of a R1T to a ICE truck).

Now in my case I am choosing between a BEV truck vs a ICE truck. I can charge the BEV with electricity produced by my solar panels and any additional electricity I buy from the power company is coming from renewable sources (it costs more but I don't care). That is a win win...
 

dfx

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Nov 23, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
114
Reaction score
169
Location
Chicago
Vehicles
2001 LandCruiser, 2015 Model S 70D

Sponsored

DucRider

Well-Known Member
First Name
Gary
Joined
Oct 21, 2019
Threads
17
Messages
1,659
Reaction score
3,157
Location
ORegon
Vehicles
Polestar 2, Ioniq, R1S
Hmm, first article I've seen that mentions it being point-of-sale instead of a tax credit.
Not gonna happen.
The language in the bill puts off any POS for one year, but the logistics of transferring a complicated tax credit (it still is structured that way) to a business make it doomed.
There is nothing on the table to give incentive for the dealer (or manufacturer) to participate. In case something goes sideways, guess who's left holding the bag.

Oregon has been trying for 3 years to get the low/moderate income dependent incentive available as POS. The only way feasible is thru a pre-approval/voucher program. In order to make the Tax Credit transferable, something similar is required.
You would have to apply to the IRS ahead of time and have them review your most recent tax statements and all other relevant income documentation. The provision would have to be modified for the credit to be based on the previous years income, not the year of purchase. They would then issue a code or some other verification that you were income eligible. Then the dealer or manufacturer would have to determine if the vehicle you were purchasing was eligible (perhaps even at the "agreed upon price") with the options you selected. You would then sign over your credit to the dealer/manufacturer who then has to submit the request to the IRS (or designated agent) for reimbursement. This is likely to take weeks if everything goes absolutely smoothly. You can imagine the additional overhead and expenses incurred tracking this process for no additional financial benefit to the dealer/manufacturer.

Anyone want to take stab at the $$ required for the government to design, implement and administer such a program?
 

Jehorton

Well-Known Member
First Name
James
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Threads
17
Messages
472
Reaction score
539
Location
Stuart Florida
Vehicles
2022 Model Y Performance
Occupation
Firefighter/Paramedic

Zoidz

Well-Known Member
First Name
Gil
Joined
Feb 28, 2021
Threads
108
Messages
3,198
Reaction score
7,042
Location
PA
Vehicles
23 R1S Adv, Avalanche, BMWs-X3,330cic,K1200RS bike
Occupation
Engineer
Can we say whole-heartedly that a BEV will have less of an environmental impact than today’s ICE over a 10 year span? I know a lot of us, including myself, have the belief that going electric is saving the environment but does it really? Sourcing materials to make batteries and producing electricity itself is damaging to the climate. So what gives? Where are we saving the environment? I’m purely asking for insight on what makes a BEV that much better ? Someone with knowledge on the subject please.
10 years? No we can't. But history has shown that when a society needs to make a big transition, we have to crawl, then toddle, then walk, then run to get to where we want/need to be regarding EVs, climate change, etc. We are probably at the toddling point right now. During the transition, the environmental impact is likely neutral and just shifting the impact in different ways. But as we evolve and improve, it will lessen the impact, just as we evolved from NOx belching factories and vehicles to where we are today. We need EV adoption today by risk takers and early adopters to get to where we need to be by 2050.

[Soap box opinion mode]

The clean, constant, unlimited electricity solution is simple, but very unpopular due to FUD. Small regional nuclear power plants using today's technology are the answer. Existing nuclear power plants are like horse & buggy. State of the Art nuclear designs are EVs. New nuclear designs exist that make it physically impossible to have a catastrophic meltdown like TMI, Chernobyl, Fukishima, etc.

[/Soap box opinion mode]
 

xyskis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
170
Reaction score
246
Location
Pacific NW
Vehicles
R1S, 4Runner, Sprinter
Occupation
Surgeon, engineer
Not gonna happen.
The language in the bill puts off any POS for one year, but the logistics of transferring a complicated tax credit (it still is structured that way) to a business make it doomed.
There is nothing on the table to give incentive for the dealer (or manufacturer) to participate. In case something goes sideways, guess who's left holding the bag.

Oregon has been trying for 3 years to get the low/moderate income dependent incentive available as POS. The only way feasible is thru a pre-approval/voucher program. In order to make the Tax Credit transferable, something similar is required.
You would have to apply to the IRS ahead of time and have them review your most recent tax statements and all other relevant income documentation. The provision would have to be modified for the credit to be based on the previous years income, not the year of purchase. They would then issue a code or some other verification that you were income eligible. Then the dealer or manufacturer would have to determine if the vehicle you were purchasing was eligible (perhaps even at the "agreed upon price") with the options you selected. You would then sign over your credit to the dealer/manufacturer who then has to submit the request to the IRS (or designated agent) for reimbursement. This is likely to take weeks if everything goes absolutely smoothly. You can imagine the additional overhead and expenses incurred tracking this process for no additional financial benefit to the dealer/manufacturer.

Anyone want to take stab at the $$ required for the government to design, implement and administer such a program?
I agree with the sentiments and facts presented in this post. Look no further than Tesla energy not participating in state and utility incentive programs (as of August 2021); too cumbersome for them to even apply despite it being thousands to tens of thousands of dollars worth of incentives.
 

CommodoreAmiga

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2020
Threads
39
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
7,712
Location
INACTIVE
Vehicles
INACTIVE
Can we say whole-heartedly that a BEV will have less of an environmental impact than today’s ICE over a 10 year span? I know a lot of us, including myself, have the belief that going electric is saving the environment but does it really? Sourcing materials to make batteries and producing electricity itself is damaging to the climate. So what gives? Where are we saving the environment? I’m purely asking for insight on what makes a BEV that much better ? Someone with knowledge on the subject please.
One of the biggest environmental motivators, imo, is that EVs can actually get cleaner, the longer you own them. Even if your power comes from coal, today -- a dirty way to generate power -- you can choose to install solar, tomorrow, or your energy provider may bring a new "green" plant online at some point, or whatever. Contrast that with an ICE vehicle and they're dirty the very first day and they only get more dirty as you drive them and parts wear out, efficiency goes down, fluids leak and get burned, etc.

The "mining for batteries is dirty" argument is a red herring, imo. Drilling for oil is a dirty business, and you're supporting a heck of a lot of that over the lifetime of a ICE vehicle! Also, we can accept that EVs aren't perfect but that's better than the status quo. Why do people think we shouldn't do EVs unless they are perfect? They're a heck of a lot better than what we've been doing, and that makes them a move in the right direction!
 

Sponsored

kurtlikevonnegut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Threads
24
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
5,686
Location
SC/TX
Vehicles
R1T QM, Honda Odyssey
Clubs
 
[Soap box opinion mode]

The clean, constant, unlimited electricity solution is simple, but very unpopular due to FUD. Small regional nuclear power plants using today's technology are the answer. Existing nuclear power plants are like horse & buggy. State of the Art nuclear designs are EVs. New nuclear designs exist that make it physically impossible to have a catastrophic meltdown like TMI, Chernobyl, Fukishima, etc.

[/Soap box opinion mode]
I try not to wade into politics on the internet for....reasons.....but this is 100% spot on. Any renewable energy plan that doesn't embrace significant expansion of nuclear power is an unserious plan. 70 years ago some of the greatest physicists of their time figured out how to harness the most abundant resource in the universe to create virtually unlimited power with minimal environmental impact and it is basically ignored. Honestly, it makes me hate the Russians that much more because you have to wonder how much more prevalent nuclear energy would be if it hadn't been for their abject failure at Chernobyl.
 

Speedrye

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
484
Reaction score
821
Location
NC
Vehicles
Commodore, Supra, FJ Cruiser
I thought this article was pretty good last year:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tilakd...s-of-clean-electric-vehicles/?sh=2aa5ca3650bd

The biggest issue is the mining. Currently, mining isn't that bad, but when we need 100x (or more) that much raw material, and then refining that material, I don't think we'll be better off than using oil. We don't have, and won't have enough solar/wind power to even come close to making all the electric (cars, leaf blowers, etc) stuff work, so nuke plants are the only viable option for most areas. I have no illusions that my driving of an electric vehicle is somehow saving the environment since it'll be powered by pretty much 100% coal.
 

jjswan33

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joshua
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Threads
116
Messages
3,817
Reaction score
8,231
Location
Sandy, OR
Vehicles
Rivian R1T LE, Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited
Occupation
Engineer
Clubs
 
I try not to wade into politics on the internet for....reasons.....but this is 100% spot on. Any renewable energy plan that doesn't embrace significant expansion of nuclear power is an unserious plan. 70 years ago some of the greatest physicists of their time figured out how to harness the most abundant resource in the universe to create virtually unlimited power with minimal environmental impact and it is basically ignored. Honestly, it makes me hate the Russians that much more because you have to wonder how much more prevalent nuclear energy would be if it hadn't been for their abject failure at Chernobyl.
100% agree as a physicist, nuclear power is one of the cleanest energy sources we have, minus the radioactive waste but with research this could be recycled many times. Even better lets throw more money at Nuclear Fusion, this is the holy grail because gives us unlimited power and a byproduct of water.
 

Friscorays

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Mar 31, 2021
Threads
70
Messages
1,165
Reaction score
2,253
Location
Dallas
Vehicles
G35, V8 Vantage, 4C, F type
Bummer about March 1, 2022.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
 




Top