Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
I like the design of Citroenās SM better. To my eye, Cadillac designers took a potentially elegant design concept and added a bit too many hints of design DNA from GMās Pontiac Aztek.It looks like a modern 4-door CitroÄn SM to me.
So do I. I would love to own an SM.I like the design of Citroenās SM better.
Or a nice DS!So do I. I would love to own an SM.
The problem with the DS is that Iād need 2: sedan and Safari wagonOr a nice DS!
I shuddered when I read āPontiac Aztecā ā¦I like the design of Citroenās SM better. To my eye, Cadillac designers took a potentially elegant design concept and added a bit too many hints of design DNA from GMās Pontiac Aztec.
I'm sure they want it to, but that doesn't mean it will
Sure, there is certainly some element of brand favoritism involved. And then there are vehicles that are just flat out fugly. In my own opinion, the Celestiq is one of those cars. As far as I am concerned, you can lump pretty much every Cadillac made in the past few decades into that bucket except perhaps the XT6 which actually isn't bad looking. I wouldn't buy it for other reasons, but it's not unattractive.It seems every fansite of American automotive brands say of the American competition either "meh, not my style" or " that is craptastic."
Cool car but "over 300 miles of range" is not acceptable.
$1k for every 1 mile of EPA range is too much money.