Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
A bit off-topic, but I had this same thought after my first ride in a Model 3 Performance - how is this legal? And for this kind of money? Though, I had the same thoughts about a Ducati I owned too.What I am worried about is with all the new BEVs coming out that are putting all this acceleration and torque and massively heavy cars in the hands of *gestures broadly at all drivers*
Iām from Texas so Iām worried itās too small.I realize that I'm talking to a forum full of enthusiasts, but is anyone pretty worried about the size? Haven't had a chance to test drive the R1S yet but I harken back to a short road trip I drove in a family member's QX80 and that thing was a UNIT. Filled up the whole lane, had a lot of mass lumbering around, etc etc. What have people's test drive impressions been? If I had a pretty negative experience with the QX80 is the R1S just going to be more of the same since it's _even wider_? All of my daily drivers (Chevy Volt, BMW Z4, Model 3) have been pretty small so perhaps 'ya just get used to it'.
Cheers
Yes, it's definitely frame of reference. Having owned Suburbans, I personally think the R1S is close to "right size" for it's target market. If OP thinks it's too large on the highway, that's their perspective, and you have to decide if you can adjust to it, or wait for the R2D2 or whatever the next generation of smaller Rivians will be called.On size, if the OPās frame of reference is a Z4, then the R1S is huge. In relative terms, it fits in the middle of ābiggerā, but not āland yachtā.
Unfortunately with a large family, I am in a bind and can't take a T. Even though I drove the T and I love it!Strongly considering swapping my reservation from T to S; wanna trade?
I really want to see one in-person and drive it. I like larger vehicles... But the pictures I've seen of people driving R1Ts make them look WAY smaller than a full size truck.I went and looked it up. The QX80 is 79.9 inches without mirrors. The R1S is 81.8" with the mirrors folded. A Ford Explorer is 78.9 inches, excluding the mirrors. So yea, the R1S is a pretty big puppy.
It is smaller. Mostly in length. I also think that the lowest setting of the air suspension makes it look smaller. Just compare the dimesions with an F150 and then a Ford Ranger. You'll see that it slots in between them.I really want to see one in-person and drive it. I like larger vehicles... But the pictures I've seen of people driving R1Ts make them look WAY smaller than a full size truck.
Actually, I shouldāve made this a bit clearer but Iād really like some references from people who have driven it - does it drive true to size? Does the EV HP & 4 motor braking fool you on the weights? Turning radius? Etc. Particularly the low center of gravity may be a huge game changer.A bit off-topic, but I had this same thought after my first ride in a Model 3 Performance - how is this legal? And for this kind of money? Though, I had the same thoughts about a Ducati I owned too.
On size, if the OPās frame of reference is a Z4, then the R1S is huge. In relative terms, it fits in the middle of ābiggerā, but not āland yachtā.
I also think vehicle dynamics are worth considering. Active dampers, adjustable ride height, low center of gravity - these are all things that will make the R1S feel like a much smaller vehicle. Itās not going to be a Z4, but it should also be far from a lumbering mass.
Yeah totally. Iām the appointed rental truck driver on moving day and can handle it fine but navigating the double-parked streets of Seattle is still more mental capacity than Iād care for. Maybe I just āget used to itā on the r1. ĀÆ\_(ć)_/ĀÆYes, it's definitely frame of reference. Having owned Suburbans, I personally think the R1S is close to "right size" for it's target market. If OP thinks it's too large on the highway, that's their perspective, and you have to decide if you can adjust to it, or wait for the R2D2 or whatever the next generation of smaller Rivians will be called.
From my perspective, I grew up in a family owned construction company and drove dump trucks as a teen. I still drive large trucks on occasion, one of my companies has an 18 foot Isuzu NPR box truck (overall length about 24 feet), and sometimes we need to rent a 26 foot Penske - nobody else will drive it, so I do it. That truck is about 32 feet long. I'm very comfortable driving these trucks, wanna talk about filling the lane, lol? When I get back into my Avalanche, it feels tiny.
I was referring to the interior, which seems much more narrow. Compact/midsize suv small ā not full-size truck big.It is smaller. Mostly in length. I also think that the lowest setting of the air suspension makes it look smaller. Just compare the dimesions with an F150 and then a Ford Ranger. You'll see that it slots in between them.
The R1S is smaller than the R1T. An R1T would actually fit my needs better, but it won't fit in my garage. I also have some concerns about long-term reliability and durability of the powered tonneau cover and tunnel doors.Yeah, the R1T is less of an issue as a truck but the R1S is huge.
FYI, you can easily log into your account and change your reservation from a T to an S or vice versa. No need to swap reservations. I've changed probably 10 times by now.Strongly considering swapping my reservation from T to S; wanna trade?
I'm from Texas and have no need for a Texas-sized vehicle! Even Texas has tight trails that don't care what state you're in.Iām from Texas so Iām worried itās too small.